Guest guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Hi all- Did I understand someone to say that I.V. treatment is no longer considered necessary? Is that true even for longstanding disease? My recollection from my original round of AP (six or seven years ago) is that I.V. is especially helpful for those with longstanding RA. What is the current stance? I clearly need to brush up on my research. Thanks again, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.