Guest guest Posted March 18, 2011 Report Share Posted March 18, 2011 Does anyone know a good dr. in upstate NY near Rochester who follows Marshall Protocol? Thanks, June On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:00 AM, mike rosner wrote: > Hi Ethel, This is Dolores I was diagnosed with Scleroderma, R/A & > MCTD which is a catchall phrase which says I have co-infections of > the the immune disease. I never got any nodules, but had most of > the symptoms of Scleroderma. The R/A & MCTD was diagnosed by Dr. > Whitman. The scleroderma was diagnosed by Dr. Trentham and when I > asked what kind, he said CREST. Well I had everythng but the > sclerodactyly. <y fingers got the sausage look , but never got > deformed. They started to curl so that when I put my finger > together the hands made a huge zero. But never went further than > that. They are totally straight right now and I lost the sausage > look years ago. I read somewhere that it was called Scleroderma > sine Sclerodactyly. When we worked for the Scleroderma Foundation, > many of the people had lost the use of their hands and one lady in > particular had to have her fingers amputated. I preached and > preached A/P but the foundation is against > it and no one in the support group went on it. Needless to say, > they were all getting worse. I am still on their mailing list and > can't wait till I go back to NYC to show them how well I did on A/ > P. They all had their loyalty to their doctors who were feeding > them prednisone and all the toxic chemicals. They are funded by a > drug company called Actelion. Thanks Take care~~~~Dolores & Mike > > > > From: Ethel Snooks <emsnooks@...> > Subject: rheumatic Nodules > rheumatic > Date: Friday, March 18, 2011, 9:42 AM > > > > ?When I was going through therapy back in 1989-91, there were no > support groups and I found Dr. Brown's book an invaluable source of > information. I read that book over and over again and suggest you > might want to do the same. > > Ethel > > From " The Road Back " by McPherson Brown, M.D. & Henry Scammell > > NODULES; THE CLASSIC HARBINGER > > The most pronounced and classic symptom of rheumatoid arthritis is > the nodule, which appears at the joints as the first external > evidence of arthritic disfigurement. Because this is so widely > recognized for what it represents, some victims of the disease are > actually relieved when the first rheumatoid nodule appears; now, at > last, the patient has something tangible to take to the doctor. > Nodules usually arise at the site of some injury, such as a sprain > or bump, and although it is possible to have one or two without > necessarily having arthritis, it is likely that all such nodules are > the result of disease activity at the site. > > Nodules are unlike malignant lesions that keep on spreading, > however, and they can come and go. Sometimes a patient will detect > one on an elbow or wrist and make an appointment with the doctor, > only to discover that the nodule has receded and perhaps even > disappeared by the time the appointment is kept. Or it can vanish in > one place and reappear later in another. > > The most likely explanation for these nodules is that they contain > fibrous tissue that forms in a skein around the small lesions where > the mycoplasmas are located. The tissue is a protective response by > the body to contain the infection and keep it from spreading. If the > mycoplasma antigen stops coming out for some reason, either because > the body's defense puts it down for a while or a medicine suppresses > it, then the scar tissue surrounding the germ is no longer needed > and the nodule goes away. The process by which this occurs is one of > natural attrition; cells are periodically replaced, and if the cause > for defense is no longer there, the body will remove the old cells > without sending in new ones. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.