Guest guest Posted March 7, 2002 Report Share Posted March 7, 2002 I thought you might be interested that the New York Times had an article on a topic dear to our hearts. (See below) If you want to see the whole article check your library or go to: http://www.nytimes.com/ and do a search for Paleolithic. Unfortunately they want money to see the whole article. I'm way behind on reading this list, so I apologize if someone has already pointed this out. Peace, Kris , gardening in northwest Ohio HEALTH & FITNESS | February 19, 2002, Tuesday VITAL SIGNS: NUTRITION; But What Did the Cow Have for Lunch? By JOHN O'NEIL (NYT) 272 words Late Edition - Final, Section F, Page 8, Column 4 LEAD PARAGRAPH - Maybe the problem in the modern diet isn't the amount of meat we eat, but the diet of the animals whose meat we're eating, according to two studies based on research comparing current diets with those of Paleolithic man. Wild animals not only have less total fat than livestock fed on grain, but more of their fat is of a kind (omega-3) thought to be good for cardiac health, and less of a kind (omega-6) that promotes heart disease, said the studies, published in the March issue of The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Many of the same benefits were found in grass-fed livestock, also known as free range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.