Guest guest Posted March 18, 2002 Report Share Posted March 18, 2002 If we get there, I think I'll join some kind of militia and become a terminator. Having gotten rid of a few powerful key people, it may become possible to change laws more easily to allow unadulterated food back on our tables. When we are not allowed to get good food, this will become a matter of self-defense. Eloquent people (maybe Sally, Dr. Byrnes, AV, etc.) need to start spreading the word not only to those who's already for what they talk about (preaching to the choir doesn't accomplish much, other than, maybe selling their books), but they need to get heard, and multiple times, by very large audiences. Coast to Coast (aka Art Bell show) is a very good audience for that. His audience is estimated to be about 15 million people. REVERSING LAWS IS VERY, VERY DIFFICULT! The speakers would have to prepare very well for the interviews to be able to backup their statements with science as much as possible. People with legal knowledge and abilities need to combine their efforts to increase their effectiveness. And maybe even sacrifice some of their time to protect our freedom to choose. Otherwise, they may have to choose another area for their work and get used to eating irradiated and pasteurized food. The same goes for people who have written good books. If their finances permit, I think they should make their books more affordable to facilitate spreading of knowledge. The Milk Book needs to be scanned electronically and made available easily. www.soilandhealth.org will host it since it's out of print now. If anyone knows Dr. 's contact info, let's suggest him as a guest for the Art Bell show too. Roman --- Food From Afar <foodfromafar@...> wrote: > I stumbled across this in searching for something > else. Here are a couple > of excerpts from the Report. Makes you wonder where > we are headed. > > United States Animal Health Association > 1997 Committee Reports > > Report of the Committee on Food Safety > > " It seems reasonable to say the lesson learned many > years ago that milk must > be pasteurized to make it safe is the single > compelling argument for > applying a similar process to certain meat and > poultry products that carry a > high risk of contamination. Unpasteurized poultry > products and ground meat > can carry pathogenic Salmonellae, E. coli, > Campylobacter, etc., that -- > given the right circumstances -- can cause serious > gastrointestinal disease; > cold pasteurization safely and effectively destroys > these pathogens. What > could make more sense than to use this technology > now to improve the safety > of foods of animal origin? __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.