Guest guest Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Hi Maz, Hope you don't mind me popping in here I have put my comments in capitals in your email. J) >>>Question: can the syphilis germ/virus be dormant in future offspring causing them medical problems OR will the virus only effect the initial person(grandfather) . Have a cousin who has Reiter's Syndrome?. I have psoriatic arthritis and in a wheel chair have just had new testing done to see what is happening. Hi , I hope you don't mind me hopping in here on this thread. I was interested in your question, because as someone with Lyme which triggered RA, I've learned that the borrelia spirochete has much in common with Treponema pallidum - the syphilis spirochete. In fact, Lyme has been dubbed the second great imitator, syphilis being the first. What they are discovering about Lyme (and about which there has been much denial in the mainstream) is that mother's infected with Lyme can pass it to their baby in utero and, if not causing miscarriage or still birth, the baby is often born with seriously confounding mental and physical deficits and abnormalities. However, in the movie documentary, Under Our Skin (which I highly recommend seeing!), a mother who previously lost babies to miscarriage and one that was stillborn (the baby was found on autopsy to have Lyme), found that her newly born son did have Lyme, but was at the time they filmed him, still symptom-free. THIS DEPENDS ON HOW NEW BORN HE IS. He may still have his mothers blood properties which would show he had Lymes. Not much is known about these spirochetal infections, which have the ability to morph into many different forms, including L-forms (spheroplasts) and dormant cystic form. What is known is that when environmental conditions in the body are not conducive to the spirochete (e.g. when under antibiotic attack), it balls up into this hard little, virus-like cyst and literally waits out the attack...sometimes for years. This is why Lyme docs also employ cyst-busting medication simultaneously with antibiotic therapy. It is the cystic form of Lyme, which is thought to cause persistence and the waxing and waning symptoms that many with this disease experience. So, the question remains...does congenital syphilis exist and, if it does, is it possible that a cystic form is passed to the fetus, in utero, and manages to hang out in the child until adulthood and then burst forth at some opportunistic time? YES THERE IS CONGENITAL SYPHALIS. HER MOTHER WOULD HAVE HAD IT AND BEEN TREATED FOR IT BECAUSE SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN TESTED AT BIRTH AND TREATED OR HAD DEFORMATIES DUE TO CONGENITAL SYPHALIS BUT SYPHALIS IS A SIMPLE BACTERIA THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED BEFORE ANGELA WAS BORN OR EVEN CONCEIVED IF SHE WAS BORN IN THE US. IF TREATED AND HER MOTHER AT SOME POINT IN HER LIFE WOULD HAVE HAD PENICILLIN THERE IS NO WAY SHE WOULD HAVE PASSED THIS TO ANGELA. BESIDES THAT HER GRANDFATHER DOES NOT PASS BLOOD TO THE FETUS (HER MOTHER) JUST HIS SPERM. I think the answer to this is still pretty much an unknown, too, but it is certainly worth considering. There are some very famous children who were born to people with syphilis, including I, queen of England, who took the throne from her father, Henry VIII, who had rampant syphilis and was likely the cause of the loss of his many children by various wives at birth. was known to have quite a few health problems, including baldness in adulthood. There's a lot of dispute over whether or not she actually had congenital syphilis, but I do wonder whether she was one of Henry's " fortunate " children, who survived birth, but was passed a cystic form of syphilis that laid dormant until she reached adulthood. I guess we'll never know for sure. IN THOSE DAYS THERE WAS NO PENICILLIN. So much is still unknown about these pleomorphic organisms, but if syphilis can be passed sexually, then it is very possible that Lyme - also a pleomorphic spirochetal infection - can be, too. And, if Lyme can be passed congenitally, then why not syphilis? BECAUSE LYME IS A DIFFERENT ORGANISM EVEN THO IT IS SIMILAR. Mice studies (Barthold etal) have now shown that borreliosis-infected mice given IV antibiotic for a short period of time become seronegative for the spirochete and it no longer shows up in their blood serum. However, when non-infected mice are then given skin grafts taken from these previously Lyme-infected, antibiotic-treated mice, these uninfected mice soon become seropositive for Lyme. Why? Well, it's likely that the antibiotic has driven the spirochete into the dormant cystic form and when tissues are transplanted into uninfected mice, the coast is clear and the spirochetes sprout out again. It's long been known that syphilis often requires open-ended treatment with antibiotic therapy, because it is a chronic, persistent disease. Why? Probably because, like Lyme, Treponema pallidum morphs into a chronic, persistent, dormant cystic form. SYPHALIS TREATMENT IS 1 SYRINGE OF PENICILLIN OR 2 WEEK OF TETRACYCLINE AND THE BLOOD IS NEGATIVE. WHEN THE CHILDREN FROM THE INFECTED PEOPLE GET MARRIED OR HAVE SURGERY THEIR BLOOD IS NEGATIVE FOR SYPHALIS. SO HOW CAN THE MICE STUDY BE TRUE UNLESS THEY WERE GIVEN CIPRO (OR ANOTHER NON PENICILLIN TETRACYCLINE MED) WHICH HAS NO EFFECT ON SYPHALIS. This is all speculation on my part and I'm just a Lyme patient - not a physician - but it's a bit like follow-the-dots with all this. The reason why many chronic Lyme patients don't get well is because they're given short courses of antibiotics that drive the spirochete back into a cystic form, but the cystic form is never addressed and, when the coast is clear again...out they come to play. ( Trouble is, this is at the root of the whole chronic Lyme debate...the mainstream arguing that a short course of antibiotics clears the infection...added to which they argue that Lyme cannot be tranmitted sexually or trans-placentally. As Dr R (a Lyme Literate MD in the Under Our Skin movie documentary), " Well, that's ridiculous; this just isn't good science! " A researcher, Dr Alan Mc is also worth checking out. WE ARE TALKING APPLES AND ORANGES HERE. Lyme need a long course of antibiotics.syphilis does not. Blood tests prove this. I don't mean to sound " know it all " here or deny any of your statements about Lyme (I have not studied Lyme) I am just keeping the ball rolling :0 Hugs, cooky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 Wow! Maz! You got me thinking. When Mike and I got married some 33 years ago, my syphillus test was negative and his was positive. Several more tests were run on him and it turned out that he tested a false positive. But I was always negative. After 15 years of marriage, Mike got sick with some blood disorders and come to find out, these blood disorders always showed a false positive for syphillus. These blood disorders were called the Lupus Anticoagulant test and that is why they removed his spleen, nic'd the pancreas during the operation and didn't anticoagulate him after surgery. Two days post, he had two massive CVA's, and a blood clot in his groin blocking the blood flow. The foot became gangrenous and had to be amputated. They also found he had anticardiolipin antibody and antiphospholipin antibody syndrome and a Protein S deficiency. He survived all that and is now anticoagulted on Coumadin daily. The next 6 years were devoted to therapy and today he is fine. Medicated but fine. Has a slight awkward walk. The nic'd pancreas still is painful as they nic'd the nerve when they put in the drains to drain the resulting pancreatic pseudo cysts that developed. Is it possible that the Lupus anticoagulant anomily was a result of prenatal acquired Lupus when the bacteria was in this crystalline cyst stage? Hmmmm! Food for thought! Maybe all these Immune altering diseases have this crystalline cyst stage dormant in our bodies. I won't call them autoimmune diseases because I don't believe there is anything auto about immunity. I believe that immunity is built into our bodies by nature to do the work of killing invading organisms, but when the body is overwhelmed with these organisms, then the immune system goes down like plugged plumbing. Now is it possible that these family of bacteria and viruses all go into this crystal ball effect just lurking for the opportunity to uncurl and strike. Hmmmm! Something to think about and explore. BTW, I now carry the Lupus anticoagulant antibody, and I am on anticoagulants---and have developed Scleroderma, R/A and maybe some MCTD. Very Interesting!!!!!----Thank you, Dolores & Mike From: momazmat@... <momazmat@...> Subject: rheumatic To - Re: FYI herx rheumatic Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 2:28 PM >>>Question: can the syphilis germ/virus be dormant in future offspring causing them medical problems OR will the virus only effect the initial person(grandfather) . Have a cousin who has Reiter's Syndrome?. I have psoriatic arthritis and in a wheel chair have just had new testing done to see what is happening.<< < Hi , I hope you don't mind me hopping in here on this thread. I was interested in your question, because as someone with Lyme which triggered RA, I've learned that the borrelia spirochete has much in common with Treponema pallidum - the syphilis spirochete. In fact, Lyme has been dubbed the second great imitator, syphilis being the first. What they are discovering about Lyme (and about which there has been much denial in the mainstream) is that mother's infected with Lyme can pass it to their baby in utero and, if not causing miscarriage or still birth, the baby is often born with seriously confounding mental and physical deficits and abnormalities. However, in the movie documentary, Under Our Skin (which I highly recommend seeing!), a mother who previously lost babies to miscarriage and one that was stillborn (the baby was found on autopsy to have Lyme), found that her newly born son did have Lyme, but was at the time they filmed him, still symptom-free. Not much is known about these spirochetal infections, which have the ability to morph into many different forms, including L-forms (spheroplasts) and dormant cystic form. What is known is that when environmental conditions in the body are not conducive to the spirochete (e.g. when under antibiotic attack), it balls up into this hard little, virus-like cyst and literally waits out the attack...sometimes for years. This is why Lyme docs also employ cyst-busting medication simultaneously with antibiotic therapy. It is the cystic form of Lyme, which is thought to cause persistence and the waxing and waning symptoms that many with this disease experience. So, the question remains...does congenital syphilis exist and, if it does, is it possible that a cystic form is passed to the fetus, in utero, and manages to hang out in the child until adulthood and then burst forth at some opportunistic time? I think the answer to this is still pretty much an unknown, too, but it is certainly worth considering. There are some very famous children who were born to people with syphilis, including I, queen of England, who took the throne from her father, Henry VIII, who had rampant syphilis and was likely the cause of the loss of his many children by various wives at birth. was known to have quite a few health problems, including baldness in adulthood. There's a lot of dispute over whether or not she actually had congenital syphilis, but I do wonder whether she was one of Henry's " fortunate " children, who survived birth, but was passed a cystic form of syphilis that laid dormant until she reached adulthood. I guess we'll never know for sure. So much is still unknown about these pleomorphic organisms, but if syphilis can be passed sexually, then it is very possible that Lyme - also a pleomorphic spirochetal infection - can be, too. And, if Lyme can be passed congenitally, then why not syphilis? Mice studies (Barthold etal) have now shown that borreliosis- infected mice given IV antibiotic for a short period of time become seronegative for the spirochete and it no longer shows up in their blood serum. However, when non-infected mice are then given skin grafts taken from these previously Lyme-infected, antibiotic-treated mice, these uninfected mice soon become seropositive for Lyme. Why? Well, it's likely that the antibiotic has driven the spirochete into the dormant cystic form and when tissues are transplanted into uninfected mice, the coast is clear and the spirochetes sprout out again. It's long been known that syphilis often requires open-ended treatment with antibiotic therapy, because it is a chronic, persistent disease. Why? Probably because, like Lyme, Treponema pallidum morphs into a chronic, persistent, dormant cystic form. This is all speculation on my part and I'm just a Lyme patient - not a physician - but it's a bit like follow-the-dots with all this. The reason why many chronic Lyme patients don't get well is because they're given short courses of antibiotics that drive the spirochete back into a cystic form, but the cystic form is never addressed and, when the coast is clear again...out they come to play. ( Trouble is, this is at the root of the whole chronic Lyme debate...the mainstream arguing that a short course of antibiotics clears the infection... added to which they argue that Lyme cannot be tranmitted sexually or trans-placentally. As Dr R (a Lyme Literate MD in the Under Our Skin movie documentary) , " Well, that's ridiculous; this just isn't good science! " A researcher, Dr Alan Mc is also worth checking out. Peace, Maz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.