Guest guest Posted March 30, 2002 Report Share Posted March 30, 2002 Normally I don't correct every minute error I make in a post, but I think this one calls for a correction. I erroneously wrote: " That would be interesting to find dogs that are not actually descended from grey wolves. Are you familiar with Wayne's work? His team did the most extensive study on DNA of wolves and dogs and found that every breed they tested (26 breeds, I think) was closely related to the wolf. In fact the (average, I think) mtDNA difference was .02%! " In fact Wayne and his team studied mtDNA samples from 140 dogs representing 67 breeds and samples from 162 wolves from various regions of the globe. Regarding mtDNA differences, quote: " The domestic dog is an extremely close relative of the gray wolf, differing from it by at most 0.2% of mtDNA sequence15,22,23. In comparrison, the gray wolf differs from its closest wild relative, the coyote, by about 4% of mitochondrial DNA sequence14 " For anyone interested in reading further on dog/wolf genetics, see: Molecular evolution of the dog family http://www.grapevine.net/~wolf2dog/wayne2.htm Multiple and Ancient Origins of the Domestic Dog http://www.grapevine.net/~wolf2dog/wayne1.htm Evolutionary Biology The Origin of Dogs: Running With the Wolves http://web.raex.com/~kitten/origin.htm For those of you who have absolutely no interest in dogs, wolves and genetics - sorry for the OT post! Suze Fisher Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg/ mailto:s.fisher22@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.