Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 Great find Ramit! As depressing as it was, I feel better about the hormone and anti-biotic free meat I get at the local health food store now, since it means they can't feed quite as much corn! Does anyone know anything about the politics of farm subsidies, more specifically, the liklihood of getting the corn subsidy repealed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 - >Does anyone know anything about the politics of farm subsidies, more >specifically, the liklihood of getting the corn subsidy repealed? I don't remember the details anymore, but the corn subsidy came up, at least peripherally, in Dole's campaign against Clinton, and it was pretty clear that corn is one of the biggest lobbies around. I think it's partly because corn companies are also into lots of other things, but regardless, it was basically an iron fortress. IIRC Dole had been one of the engineers in the Senate of the corn ethanol subsidy, one of the greater absurdities of modern life. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 At 05:40 AM 4/1/02 +0000, you wrote: >Does anyone know anything about the politics of farm subsidies, more >specifically, the liklihood of getting the corn subsidy repealed? > > Don't know about repealing but this is the farm subsidy database <http://ewg.org/farm>http://ewg.org/farm/ You can find who gets subsidies in your county. The list I got this from had some people in areas where the name of the receiver was not made available. It was thought these were corporate farms receiving subsidy. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 , Thanks for the great laugh. No way jose'. The big companies use the corn subsidies to promote the future of the american farmer, and most buy into it. No corn subsidies, no farmers. Absurd yes but it serves the processors to keep a raw material supply afloat for a little while while controlling them at the same time(farmers). We have a grain farmer in our county that farms 800 acres of corn and is the biggest farmer we have around here, and his main complaint is that the government is not paying him enough to farm!! No kidding.. Not only that the corn subsidy supports the industries that own the seed companies, that own the processing plants, that own the pharmaceutical companies, that own the patient on rbgh and the antibiotics feed cows that eat the corn that end up in the processing facilities. Cheap meat, i don't think so... It is know as " top down integration " Nice word for Monopoly, and they play for keeps.. do not pass go, do not collect 100.00. justinbond wrote: > Great find Ramit! As depressing as it was, I feel better about the > hormone and anti-biotic free meat I get at the local health food > store now, since it means they can't feed quite as much corn! > > Does anyone know anything about the politics of farm subsidies, more > specifically, the liklihood of getting the corn subsidy repealed? > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 > >Does anyone know anything about the politics of farm subsidies, more >specifically, the liklihood of getting the corn subsidy repealed? Consider somebody like Tom Daschle. He's out of step with the politics of a lot of South Dakotans; he's even been recently spanked by his state legislature (they just passed a law saying that one can't run for President and Senator at the same time.) Yet he keeps on getting re-elected. Why? He brings home the bacon for the farmers. Or consider how the west side of Michigan just lost a Life Saver factory to Canada, because of sugar price supports that benefit the east side of Michigan. Farm subsidies will only be repealed when it is in farmers' best interests to repeal them. Which means we have to show enough farmers that they can make more money without the subsidies. The other weak point is to show how many " farmers " are actually large corporate agribusinesses. ADM, Ted and the rest don't need your money or mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 > > > >Does anyone know anything about the politics of farm subsidies, more > >specifically, the liklihood of getting the corn subsidy repealed? > > Consider somebody like Tom Daschle. He's out of step with the > politics of a lot of South Dakotans; I never realized that Daschle had politics outside of the purely partisan and local. I'd be interested in hearing more about this. > Farm subsidies will only be repealed when it is in farmers' best > interests to repeal them. Or, as Bradley and McCain both pointed out in the last presidential election, these things would be toast if we fulfill our obligations under the WTO. As McCain said explicitly, it's perhaps the only chance for ending " corporate welfare " . Too bad both major parties nominate fools and cowards instead of people with brains and integrity. Soren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2002 Report Share Posted April 2, 2002 > > > > > >Does anyone know anything about the politics of farm subsidies, > more > > >specifically, the liklihood of getting the corn subsidy repealed? > > > > Consider somebody like Tom Daschle. He's out of step with the > > politics of a lot of South Dakotans; > > I never realized that Daschle had politics outside of the purely > partisan and local. I'd be interested in hearing more about this. > > > Farm subsidies will only be repealed when it is in farmers' best > > interests to repeal them. > > Or, as Bradley and McCain both pointed out in the last presidential > election, these things would be toast if we fulfill our obligations > under the WTO. As McCain said explicitly, it's perhaps the only > chance for ending " corporate welfare " . > > Too bad both major parties nominate fools and cowards instead of > people with brains and integrity. > > Soren Yes, someone does know more about farm subsidies. See ACRES' USA. I'll admit up front I haven't read the article yet, BUT are you saying farmers benefit from subsidies? FARM SUBSIDIES MOSTLY KEEP PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, BIG AND SMALL, ARTIFICIALLY LOW AND THIS KEEPS CORPORATE FOOD PROCESSORS PROFITS HIGH, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME KEEPING SAD FOOD CHEAP AT THE GROCERY STORES. This means farmers are not paid what their raw materials (products they're selling) are worth when they sell to food processors. And where else do they sell? The food processor is the big thief! Who's allowing this?.... Read ACRES' USA about raw materials. The politicians are not necessarily foolish and cowardly, howeverthere's a lot of politics going on. Greed,you scratch my back I'll scratch yours, etc. Getting OT I suppose. Best Regards, Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.