Guest guest Posted January 30, 2001 Report Share Posted January 30, 2001 This is a really difficult one. When I worked we had a lot of drug addicts coming to us for methadone and I've seen this situation a number of times. One girl had a baby about the time I had DD2. This girl's baby was born addicted and then died at 10 weeks, alone and hungry in a flat, supposedly a cot death. She had also lost a couple of other babies in similar circumstances but had a 5 yr old boy. The handbook for drug addicts (yes, there is such a thing) at that time stated quite clearly that although it was preferable, no harm would come to the baby by the mum taking drugs while pg because it could be weaned off its own drug addiction after it was born. (That involved a nurse having to inject heroin into a tiny baby every day, or leaving it to go cold turkey.) How can addicts even begin to make a decision when given that sort of information? Its totally at odds with other mums being told to check with a dr or mw before taking even a headache pill. Yet I discovered that drug addicts are humans too and some of them I grew quite fond of. They are their own worst enemies but they are also victims. Their backgrounds can be tragic. One girl with four children could not have possibly managed without the help of her wonderful mother. But at the same time, her own father was on the streets peddling prescription drugs! Eventually this young woman was left a widow when her husband was discovered dead of a heroin overdose on the toilets of the health centre. There are so many more awful stories, it pains me to think of such sad lives and that the chances are those babies will one day grow up to live the same agonies all over again. I wish I had an answer. Lesley --------------------------------- From: k.2.thorn@ I have just found out that my mums next-door neighbour has just become a grandma again - she currently looks after the other grandson too. Unfortunately, the little boy is currently in intensive care because his mum didn't stop taking drugs throughout the pregnancy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2001 Report Share Posted January 31, 2001 >Be thankful that the grandmother is being allowed to raise the children - >unfortunately all too often the politically correct lobby bend over >backwards to ensure that such children are kept with mothers even though >they are hopelessly inadequate - in a former life I was a family lawyer and >one of my most recent saddest cases was where a 16 year old mother regained >residence of her 18 month old child because she was " at home all day " as >opposed to this little girl being looked after by a combination of her 18 >year old father and 42 year old grandmother (registered childminder). This >child has been hospitalised countless times since birth with breathing >problems and mother still persists in smoking in her presence. When we >raised this at a case conference we were told by a HV " 80% of my clients >with small children smoke " - oh so that makes it all right then does >it?!?!?!? > >Here endeth my rant for today (well at least until my Terrible Two gets home >from nursery!!) On the other hand, social workers et al are berated for being 'politically correct' in having concerns about foster parents or prospective adopters being smokers. If the refusal to allow a mother care of her own child was expressed as " because she smokes " there would be an outcry. I felt very edgy about some people I knew who fostered children with Down's, with all the respiratory vulnerabilities that can imply. Both foster parents were very heavy smokers - but was there something better out there for these children? I also used to find it 'interesting' when asked to support re-housing applications on the grounds of a child's asthma when the parents were smokers - but then again, the fact that their addiction was probably a lot more significant a factor didn't necessarily rule out any benefit to the child's health from moving. I've also encountered some lovely mums with a history of drug use for whom their child has been, well, redemptive, I can think of no better word. It is an issue obviously because people with serious challenges such as drug use (and all the lack of coping skills that IMHO that can imply) may well require a lot of resources to help them be good enough parents. I don't think the majority of people in serious life difficulties actually *mean* to get pregnant, they only meant to have sex! (Just look at how many unplanned pregnancies there are amongst people who are not in such difficult circumstances) -- jennifer@... Vaudin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2001 Report Share Posted January 31, 2001 >Be thankful that the grandmother is being allowed to raise the children - >unfortunately all too often the politically correct lobby bend over >backwards to ensure that such children are kept with mothers even though >they are hopelessly inadequate - in a former life I was a family lawyer and >one of my most recent saddest cases was where a 16 year old mother regained >residence of her 18 month old child because she was " at home all day " as >opposed to this little girl being looked after by a combination of her 18 >year old father and 42 year old grandmother (registered childminder). This >child has been hospitalised countless times since birth with breathing >problems and mother still persists in smoking in her presence. When we >raised this at a case conference we were told by a HV " 80% of my clients >with small children smoke " - oh so that makes it all right then does >it?!?!?!? > >Here endeth my rant for today (well at least until my Terrible Two gets home >from nursery!!) On the other hand, social workers et al are berated for being 'politically correct' in having concerns about foster parents or prospective adopters being smokers. If the refusal to allow a mother care of her own child was expressed as " because she smokes " there would be an outcry. I felt very edgy about some people I knew who fostered children with Down's, with all the respiratory vulnerabilities that can imply. Both foster parents were very heavy smokers - but was there something better out there for these children? I also used to find it 'interesting' when asked to support re-housing applications on the grounds of a child's asthma when the parents were smokers - but then again, the fact that their addiction was probably a lot more significant a factor didn't necessarily rule out any benefit to the child's health from moving. I've also encountered some lovely mums with a history of drug use for whom their child has been, well, redemptive, I can think of no better word. It is an issue obviously because people with serious challenges such as drug use (and all the lack of coping skills that IMHO that can imply) may well require a lot of resources to help them be good enough parents. I don't think the majority of people in serious life difficulties actually *mean* to get pregnant, they only meant to have sex! (Just look at how many unplanned pregnancies there are amongst people who are not in such difficult circumstances) -- jennifer@... Vaudin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.