Guest guest Posted April 8, 2002 Report Share Posted April 8, 2002 Hi , Me: >So, do you think that too much reliance on cow's milk (as opposed to >mother's milk) in growing infants might hinder brain development? Thoughts >on any of this? P: I don't know, but I'm somewhat skeptical about their claim that human milk is so low in fat. We know that women eating a SAD give milk that is low in fat, but that women eating a healthy traditional diet give a much fattier milk. Are there any figures on the fat content of such mothers' milks? Me again: Pond doesn't provide a lipid profile of human milk, although I'd imagine one or more could be found in an Internet search. It would certainly be important to know the diet of the person whose milk is profiled. I'd love to see some mother's milk profiles of some of the folks WAP studied... However, here's an interesting quote from the book that addresses the lowish fat of human breast milk, mentioned in a previous quote: In a chapter entitled " fat people " Pond writes: " In higher primates, an adequate supply of the right kinds of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids is essential to nourish the foetus's brain during gestation, and, particularly in humans, it remains important into the suckling period. Maternal obesity could help to ensure adequate supplies, though rather inefficiently, since most adipose tissue tracylglycerols contain saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids that are not suitable for making neural phospholipids. There is certainly significant movement of fatty acids from mother to foetus across the placenta: during the first half of pregnancy the lipids go mainly to the brain and other neural tissues, but in the final three months they accumulate in adipose tissue, with the result that human babies are unusually fat at birth. It could be argued that neonatal obesity is an incidental consequence of the evolution of mechanisms for transferring larger quantities of lipids from mother to foetus. Lipids cannot be easily used for energy production during gestation, so as the nervous system's need for them wanes, they have to be deposited in the adipose tissue. A larger brain uses more energy so, as well as requiring more lipid early in pregnancy for the raw materials of brain growth, more carbohydrate is needed to sustain it in action. Its metabolism accounts for a substantial fraction of the foetus's total heat output, but overheating is potentially dangerous and must be avoided. Hair reduction, and minimising the amount of adipose tissue in and on the abdomen would help the mother to dissipate heat efficiently. The necessary lipid stores accumulate elsewhere in the adipose tissue on the buttock and thighs. This anomalous growth pattern may also explain why primate milk is exceptionally low in lipids: brain development in primate infants is so nearly complete shortly after birth that they don't need many more precursors for phospholipids to complete the job. Since the other tissues are growing quite slowly and the babies are carried by their mothers, they don't need energy-dense milk as much as calves and fawns that grow fast and have to run for their lives from birth onwards. These contrasts in the timing of the use of lipids in development, and the amount of strenuous activity that neonates perform also mean, of course, that feeding babies on cows' milk provides them with lipid to spare and so they fatten, but feeding calves on women's milk would leave them abnormally thin. Veal is very lean because the calves are separated from their mother within a few days of birth and raised on diluted or even synthetic milk. " More from Pond on human breast milk: " In brief, too many trans fatty acids may impair the maturation of important non-regenerating organs like the nervous system and the eye, or the capacity of tissues to respond effectively to injury or infection. Cow's milk (used to make powdered baby milk) contains more trans fatty acids than women's milk... " " As might be expected in view of the unique chemical composition and physical state of milk, lipid digestion in mammalian neonates has some special features that disappear at weaning. The saliva of human infants, rat pups and calves (and probably other mammals) contains a lipase that hydrolyses triacyclglycerols, so digestion begins in the mouth. Since milk is already a lipid-in-water emulsion, emulsification by stomach churning and bile secretion is much less important to its digestion. The milk of humans, gorillas (and possibly other primates) and carnivores also contains a lipase, which supplements the action of lipases that the neonates produce for themselves. It has been proposed that adding a lipase could make artificial infant food more digestible for premature or sick babies. " [note this is the second similarity she notes between carnivore and human milk - the first being nearly identical lipid profile] This is a very interesting book and I'd recommend it to anyone interested in lipids and their evolutionary history, both in mammals and plants. It was recommended to me by a cat person who's widely read in nutrition research and actually has access to a lot of unpublished and prepublished work at her job. Plus she reads fluently in 3 languages and since she's in Switzerland, probably gets ahold of stuff that's not easily accessed here. Anyway, she was the first person to recommend Enig's book to me at a time when I was quoting too heavily from Udo's book. I'm glad she recommended it because I have found the Pond book fascinating, especially since she gives an historical/evolutionary context to just about everything. Suze Fisher Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg/ mailto:s.fisher22@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.