Guest guest Posted April 7, 2002 Report Share Posted April 7, 2002 In a message dated 4/7/02 11:13:01 AM Central Daylight Time, ynos@... writes: > This > approach, in my opinion, is the way to deal with their saying that > all milk needs to be pasteurized for consumer safety. Instead of > being on the defensive regarding raw milk, we need to be on the > offensive regarding the nutritional value of milk, demonstrating that > people should fear the milk in the stores but should desire milk of > high nutritional value that is no threat to the health of their > families. > Chi > > > This is why, in TN, I am going for raw milk sales from small farms. I mean small, as in 15 to 20 goats, 5 or 6 cows. With an operation this small the farmer hasn't got the money to grain feed. The milking part seems to be what worries officials here but as we pointed out to the pair that visited us, if I milk the cow and manure gets into the milk I dump it. I don't want to drink manure. In a large dairy, who cares? Belinda LaBelle Acres www.labelleacres.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2002 Report Share Posted April 7, 2002 > Anybody know how folks are doing the own a cow thing to get milk? > Or know who is doing it? Hi Belinda: My farmer sells 1/4 cow to people who wish to purchase diary products. If the cow dies, your investment is transferred to another cow. Thus you always own 1/4 of one producing cow in the farmer's herd. Instead of paying room and board for your 1/4 cow, you pay for the dairy products as you take them. If you move away or wish to stop buying his dairy products, you receive 80% of your original investment back and your 1/4 cow is sold to someone else. Neither my farmer nor I believe that all milk should be sold raw. Both of us believe the milk sold in the stores should be pasteurized. It would be unwise to feed raw milk of little or no nutritional value to an unhealthy population that is malnourished. Such milk would be expected to contain pathogens that would make unhealthy people sick. The issue of raw milk is tied to nutrition. When quantity, instead of nutritional quality, is the object, the milk should probably always be pasteurized. I suggest that quantity is the object if the cows are holsteins, if the cows are grain fed or if hybrid grass is planted in the pasure instead of addressing the soil fertility. I would suspect Weston Price would agree with this. A scientific trial should be done by the establishment to see if raw milk from cows that aren't holsteins, that are only fed grass growing in soil of high soil fertility (on pasure in season and fed hay in the rest of the year) makes people sick or makes people healthier. The scientific trial should establish the relative pathogen content of conventional dairy milk before and after it is pasteurized and the pathogen content from the milk produced in the manner described above. You should only expect the establishment to conduct this trial if you also expect them to shoot themselves in the foot. This approach, in my opinion, is the way to deal with their saying that all milk needs to be pasteurized for consumer safety. Instead of being on the defensive regarding raw milk, we need to be on the offensive regarding the nutritional value of milk, demonstrating that people should fear the milk in the stores but should desire milk of high nutritional value that is no threat to the health of their families. Chi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2002 Report Share Posted April 8, 2002 We are now looking into buying an acreage and owning a cow. Sonja Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.