Guest guest Posted March 22, 2002 Report Share Posted March 22, 2002 Thanks for the response. But before I can have any fun i have to get over this feeling of being violated and refered to as basically a number to be dealt with, something that is in the way of a bigger concern. I can't believe (and I should by now) the overt superiority content of the inter departmental faxes its like they are of their own serving only themselves. I never saw once, other than Barb Inghams prewritten diatribe, the fact that they are concerned with the safety of the public. They had to go to Barb to get an opinion that looked offical to back up their beliefs that milk is unsafe I have my parinoia about goverment but its still very unnerving to see it in print from those being paid to keep us safe. this is a gross misuse of power larger than that I have ever heard of. Watergate was what 25 years ago and yet this stuff still happens free reign within state goverment. Im sorry if I seem a bit nieve, but man I can't fathom that people in powerful postions have this attitude toward their consituents. This saddens me in a way that I have not felt for some time, and it easily explains their motive for turning out a MOU severly altered to intenionally get someone sick to make their life easier. Not only is Datcp influenced towards unabashed bias, they are morally currupt. What else have they done that we dont(as the public) know about? I still sit here shaking my head in disbelief. This farm and the other milk direct farms sole purpose is to provide the best possible food to those who have reasoning capabilities left to know that the current food INDUSRTY is slowly killing the population, and now we see how much the state is in bed with those who would benifit from such degredation. its no wonder food compaines are moving to aquire phyramicutical compaines the people need the pills to survive the food they are force to choke down. How much money was spent creating this stack of worthless papers, how many man hours spent on our case alone? I can see the headlines now CLEARVIEW ACRES FINDS REASON FOR STATE DEFICET, or DATCP AGREES TO MATCH FUNDS EXPENDED IN DEAD END UNDERCOVER OPS TO THE NEEDEY. CAROL GALLAGER WALKS THE STREETS BEGGING FOR FOOD, OR TOM CARL AND STEVE OPEN IRRADIATED FOOD RESTURANT! Well now I'm haven fun thanks for the shoulder. See ya soon Tim GSGlenn1@... wrote: > Thanks for the email Tim. > > I just called Marquardt at DATCP to follow up on my letter. He said > he's been busy but that we now have everything (all DATCP documents) > from the original complaint file against you and the original > complaint file against Brunners. He said he thought the documents > relative to the December enforcement order file was not included in > the discovery order from the ALJ. I said it was because that case was > consolidated into this case--everything has been consolidated into one > case. He said he would look at the order again and go back and get us > the documents or let me know if he disagrees with my interpretation. > I'll keep you posted. We will get the documents! > > Bottom line is you can say to the media that we have some but not all > of DATCP's documents. We have requested the rest but not received > them yet. You can also say it looks like a set up, in effect > " entrapment " by DATCP because at the same time they were allowing you > to operate under the MOU they were secretly investigating you and > obtaining milk from you to test and to use in building their case. > You can also say that DATCP has apparently singled you and Brunner's > out for selective prosecution. Finally, you can say that DATCP > couldn't even get the Sawyer County District Attorney to take the > case, in part because he seems to agree with our interpretation of the > law that " incidental sales " are legal, that there is no prohibition > against advertising, and that DATCP itself had entered into the MOU. > I'd give the media a copy of his letter. > > Have fun! > > Glenn Stoddard > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2002 Report Share Posted March 23, 2002 > Im sorry if I seem a bit nieve, but man I can't fathom that people in > powerful postions have this attitude toward their consituents. Would it be possible, when it's all over, to file a lawsuit against them? That might make others think twice before they do something like that to others. These kinds of people need to be removed. Roman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2002 Report Share Posted March 23, 2002 > > Im sorry if I seem a bit nieve, but man I can't fathom that people > in > > powerful postions have this attitude toward their consituents. > > >>>>>>>>>>.......>>>>>>>>It's time to get new elected officials BUT where are we going to find better ones to elect? My county sues me at the farm for ridiculous things about every 3rd month. The county attorney, county commissioners, zoning administrator, and emergency preparedness people are out of line in " powerful positions " in Dickinson County, Kansas. Anybody care to vote? The idea of sueing sounds good but I've always heard " You can't sue city hall " . I am getting some help from the state Representative. Dennis Kemnitz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.