Guest guest Posted April 22, 2002 Report Share Posted April 22, 2002 > " Dry Fried Rice : Rice normally should be avoided if you need to lower > your insulin levels. However clinically it appears that if one fries the > rice until golden brown with NO oil, the rice structure changes. It can > then be cooked normally and this form of cooking will release the rice > sugar more slowly into the blood and will not cause as much of a > challenge to insulin control. " I read this too and wasn't impressed. First of all, I get the impression that he's talking about white rice. In that case, soaking it wouldn't matter much because all of the minerals (phytate bound or not) have been milled away. If you were to try it with brown rice, you'd have to soak it, dry it, and then dry fry it. Otherwise the frying would destroy the enzymes that soaking uses to eliminate the phytates. However, what didn't impress me about it is that (since I think he's talking about white rice) all it does is slow down the absorption of empty calories. I could make hard candies from sugar and get the same effect by only sucking on them, a nice slow release of sugar. The fact remains, however, that they are empty calories. I suppose if rice is a major comfort food for you, you might not want to cut it out entirely. If that were the case, this might work to ameliorate some of the effects. Otherwise, I think you're better off soaking your brown rice and getting some nutrition, or simply not eating rice at all... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2002 Report Share Posted April 23, 2002 At 10:15 AM 4/22/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > " Dry Fried Rice : Rice normally should be avoided if you need to lower > > your insulin levels. However clinically it appears that if one fries the > > rice until golden brown with NO oil, the rice structure changes. It can > > then be cooked normally and this form of cooking will release the rice > > sugar more slowly into the blood and will not cause as much of a > > challenge to insulin control. " > >I read this too and wasn't impressed. First of all, I get the impression >that he's talking about white rice. You didn't read far enough. Dr. Mercola does not recommend white rice. This is a quote just a few paragraphs past the part about dry frying rice: " WARNING! " This diet will cause you to lose weight. If you do not want or need to lose weight you can increase the following foods: beans, carrots, squash, fruits, nuts, brown (not white) rice, millet and yams. Stop the rice and yams if your original symptoms worsen. You can also add shredded coconut and avocados to some of your meals to add calories. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2002 Report Share Posted April 23, 2002 > You didn't read far enough. Dr. Mercola does not recommend white > rice. This is a quote just a few paragraphs past the part about dry > frying rice: > ... Ahh, but then the second part of my criticism still stands. If he is, in fact, talking about brown rice, heating the rice like that makes phytate reduction impossible by destroying the phytase enzyme. Not to mention that a double heating (especially using high temperatures) is going to destroy more of the B vitamins, EFA and Vitamin E content. All just to lower the glycemic index of a food...? It just seems somewhat wrong-headed to focus more on slowing the digestion of the food than on maximizing the nutrition of the food. If we're so convinced that our food is poison that we spend all our energy eliminating those poisons, how on earth are we going to have enough energy and money left over to focus on providing ourselves with adequate nutrition? ...and providing ourselves with adequate nutrition is virtually the entire premise of WAP and NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.