Guest guest Posted April 14, 2011 Report Share Posted April 14, 2011 Hugs to you... . > > I saw nada's T for the second time today. At the first session, I felt like I was kind of having to clue her into a lot of truths she had not heard, but I got the impression that she agreed with my diagnosis of nada being BPD. I think she had figured out that nada was teetering on the edge of reality, but she'd expected me to be equally or more nuts myself based upon what she had heard. After our first session, she requested to see me again individually. Nada fought tooth and nail to be included in the session- even going around the T to email me and ask if she could join us, but the T held firm and said she needed to see me one more time individually to decide where to go from here. Well, in between session 1, Nada's interaction with the T, and my session 2, the T had figured it all out. It was like we were speaking the same language with this session. She validated so many of my perceptions not only about nada, but about my sister (who won't have anything to do with my while nada and I are NC). It felt so incredibly good to have someone get it that hardly even knows me or my story from my angle! That was definitely a small victory for me. > > Now, on the reverse side of that the T was very honest with me and told me the possibility of having a healthy relationship with nada did not look good... She said Nada will not deal well with limited communication even if we manipulate her into thinking it's her idea. She also pointedly told me that I should not ever be alone with nada. Wow...the T is actually NADA'S T, and yet she was insightful enough to know that I'm not the crazy one! So, we may try this " limited contact " thing, but the T and I are both pretty certain we'll be back to NC before long and probably for good. The T told me that nada will never be able to change- period. I guess this really saddens me... It was one thing for my T, who doesn't even know nada to say there was no hope for change or improvement, but it's another for nada's own T, the only person who's ever worked with her and gotten at least partway into her head to tell me there's no hope. That little girl inside of me has kept the hope alive, but I almost feel today it's really about to die, and for good. It feels more real today than ever despite having not even heard her voice in 9 months now. The death of hope is a sad thing, but better I accept it and deal with it now than keep trying to shove a square peg into a round hole... > > Thanks for listening. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2011 Report Share Posted April 14, 2011 (((((Anglslh))))) I think I know what you mean. When my Sister told me the horrible, ugly, mean, untrue things that nada had said to Sister about Sister, and about me, and about Sister's son, back about 3 years ago now, it was as though my Sister had told me that our mother had died. That was the death of hope, I guess, or perhaps the death of the illusion that I'd carried for my whole life that my mother did, underneath it all, in spite of all the verbal and physical abuse, somehow actually love me. What nada said that day killed that illusion. It was the proverbial " last straw. " Nobody who actually loved me and knew me, and knew my heart could possibly think such an ugly thing about me. So that day I buried that illusion, and it felt like a punch in the stomach, like a death, and I mourned and grieved like it was a physical death, for days. I have been in virtually No Contact with my nada ( " nada " = not a mom) ever since. I think that is awesome that your nada's therapist is being so open and honest with you. A very similar situation is what allowed my Sister to feel the " absolution " or " permission " to let go of the inappropriate feelings of guilt and responsibility that she was feeling towards our nada. The therapist that our nada was seeing just happened to be the adult child of a borderline pd/narcissistic pd mother, so he understood the dynamic quite well. The therapist, a psychologist, was able to let Sister know that it was OK and in Sister's best interest to stop trying to " rescue " our nada, and OK to allow more emotional and physical detachment from nada for Sister's own mental health. Anyway, I totally empathize with where you are coming from. -Annie > > I saw nada's T for the second time today. At the first session, I felt like I was kind of having to clue her into a lot of truths she had not heard, but I got the impression that she agreed with my diagnosis of nada being BPD. I think she had figured out that nada was teetering on the edge of reality, but she'd expected me to be equally or more nuts myself based upon what she had heard. After our first session, she requested to see me again individually. Nada fought tooth and nail to be included in the session- even going around the T to email me and ask if she could join us, but the T held firm and said she needed to see me one more time individually to decide where to go from here. Well, in between session 1, Nada's interaction with the T, and my session 2, the T had figured it all out. It was like we were speaking the same language with this session. She validated so many of my perceptions not only about nada, but about my sister (who won't have anything to do with my while nada and I are NC). It felt so incredibly good to have someone get it that hardly even knows me or my story from my angle! That was definitely a small victory for me. > > Now, on the reverse side of that the T was very honest with me and told me the possibility of having a healthy relationship with nada did not look good... She said Nada will not deal well with limited communication even if we manipulate her into thinking it's her idea. She also pointedly told me that I should not ever be alone with nada. Wow...the T is actually NADA'S T, and yet she was insightful enough to know that I'm not the crazy one! So, we may try this " limited contact " thing, but the T and I are both pretty certain we'll be back to NC before long and probably for good. The T told me that nada will never be able to change- period. I guess this really saddens me... It was one thing for my T, who doesn't even know nada to say there was no hope for change or improvement, but it's another for nada's own T, the only person who's ever worked with her and gotten at least partway into her head to tell me there's no hope. That little girl inside of me has kept the hope alive, but I almost feel today it's really about to die, and for good. It feels more real today than ever despite having not even heard her voice in 9 months now. The death of hope is a sad thing, but better I accept it and deal with it now than keep trying to shove a square peg into a round hole... > > Thanks for listening. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2011 Report Share Posted April 14, 2011 I also understand this feeling. It really does feel like a total loss (death?). I came to this conclusion when, after numerous attempts at setting boundaries with how nada was expected to behave around my young daughter, she trampled every one. Nada demanded to have her right as a grandnada to unsupervised, overnight visits without respecting our boundaries. I decided at that point that if she could not consider the health of an innocent child that she would never get it. It has been about one year and the only contact she has made has been mail addressed to my daughters (I had a second daughter that nada has never has a relationship with). I grieved for quite awhile and still have days where I question if she can act differently or if I am really the one with the problem. I know, though, that I cannot keep my babies safe from her unless I continue to keep NC. BB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.