Guest guest Posted August 13, 2006 Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 From the Houston Chronicle: <http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4113431.html> Fees from professionals There was a time when most of the licensing and registration fees paid by doctors, lawyers, architects and other professions and occupations were spent to support the state boards that regulated them. Some of that money still pays for the boards, but laws were changed during the budget crunch of the late 1980s and early 1990s to make the various regulatory fees available for general state spending. In fiscal 2005, the state collected about $35 million in fees from doctors. Only $8 million, almost one-fourth of the total, was appropriated to the Texas Medical Board, which regulates the profession, said board spokeswoman Jill Wiggins. The remainder was spent elsewhere. **************************************** For all those pondering a separate EMS commission, here's hurdle #2. Not unbeatable, but a significant challenge. How do you prepare a budget when you can't use the numbers you'd get from professional licensing as a basis? How do you 'confirm " you numbers if they're all dependent on what the legislature decides to do, or not do, every year? I'm not being facetious - I'm asking a serious question. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2006 Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 Mike, Kathy reported that DSHS currently gets less than $1M of the $2.5M collected annually...fix that and a lot of things could get better. Dudley For Legislature, raiding earmarked funds routine From the Houston Chronicle: <http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4113431.html> Fees from professionals There was a time when most of the licensing and registration fees paid by doctors, lawyers, architects and other professions and occupations were spent to support the state boards that regulated them. Some of that money still pays for the boards, but laws were changed during the budget crunch of the late 1980s and early 1990s to make the various regulatory fees available for general state spending. In fiscal 2005, the state collected about $35 million in fees from doctors. Only $8 million, almost one-fourth of the total, was appropriated to the Texas Medical Board, which regulates the profession, said board spokeswoman Jill Wiggins. The remainder was spent elsewhere. **************************************** For all those pondering a separate EMS commission, here's hurdle #2. Not unbeatable, but a significant challenge. How do you prepare a budget when you can't use the numbers you'd get from professional licensing as a basis? How do you 'confirm " you numbers if they're all dependent on what the legislature decides to do, or not do, every year? I'm not being facetious - I'm asking a serious question. Mike ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2006 Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 We should all contact our legislative representatives about EMS regulation. Many of them do not know what EMS does. Many don't know the difference between an ECA and a Paramedic. The only thing we can do is to try to educate them. Ask your representative why it is that the money we pay into the state for certification doesn't all go to the DSHS EMS program. Demand that the law be changed to give us all our money. But you won't. EMS people are among the most apathetic folks in the world. They won't do anything politically to help themselves. Too bad. G Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.