Guest guest Posted November 18, 2011 Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 Since there have been several new members arriving lately, I'm posting a link to a short article that I found kind of amazing. It lists the characteristics or traits of narcissistic mothers: http://sites.google.com/site/harpyschild/ Since my nada has been mostly a " Queen " bpd (and a " Witch " bpd) she evidenced many of the traits in this list. The designations " Queen " , " Witch " , " Waif " , and " Hermit " bpd come from the book " Understanding The Borderline Mother " by Lawson; the " Queen " bpd has narcissistic pd traits as a co-morbidity, so its like a two-for-one package deal: you get a mom with both borderline pd and narcissistic pd. Randi Kreger, the owner of this Group and author of " The Essential Family Guide to BPD " wrote an article about " UTBM " at the " Psychology Today " website that gives a good summary of the sub-sets that Lawson created: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-walking-eggshells/201109/the-world-the-\ borderline-mother-and-her-children Basic breakdown: " Hermit " = bpd + avoidant pd " Waif " = bpd + dependent pd " Queen " = bpd + narcissistic pd " Witch " = bpd + antisocial (sociopathic/psychopathic) pd Bottom line: A mother with moderate to severe personality disorder *cannot* view her own child as what the child actually is: a separate, unique individual human being with needs, feelings, rights, wishes, dreams, and opinions that might differ from the mother's. The bpd mother, instead, will perceive her child as practically anything else: as her own mother/father, as an extension of her own self, as her possession, as her servant, as her sister/brother, as an idealized projection of her own best traits (golden child), as the carrier of all her own most hated and shameful traits (scapegoat child) as her substitute spouse, as her rescuer, as her best friend, as her hated rival and enemy, as a reincarnation of the child's father (whom she may loathe or idealize), as a chain and anchor around her neck.... etc. A mother who cannot perceive and relate to her own child as the unique individual that the child is, is going to damage her child. The severity of the damage varies from case to case. The criteria that define bpd are virtually the anthesis of the definition of a " good enough " mother. Lawson recommends early intervention and supervision of mothers with personality disorder to protect their children from psychological damage, or in the most severe cases, the child needs to be removed to a safe environment. -Annie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2011 Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 Thank you so much. This is exactly what we are dealing with! I mean, this is it to an absolute " T " . WOW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2011 Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 That was a good reading....so very helpful and amazingly right on target. This is so helpful to those who are just learning and trying to figure out this confusion. That's how I felt....knowing something was terribly wrong put not being able to make sense out of it. I'm an educated woman but while in the craziness....I couldn't make sense out of what had been happening all these years. Thank you for sharing...this makes sense. > > Thank you so much. This is exactly what we are dealing with! I mean, this is it to an absolute " T " . WOW. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2011 Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 Thank you so much, Annie--every time you post this, I re-read it, and the longer I am NC, the more it hits home, as I get enough distance to see what really was happening. Just a few that stick out today: Masked insults by insincere congratulations. So many times I would be proud of an accomplishment, and bring it to her for mirroring, and I'd get 'yes, CONGRATULATIONS, CHAR-lie', in an exasperated, sarcastic tone that at once said she was put out and disguested, and not *really impressed...but of course, tone can be denied. Point one of this article is so important because it hits the nail on the head for nadas: insults must always be 'masked' so that they can deny them to outsiders and themselves and, most importantly, to the victim. Parties thrown for non-traditional reasons so that nada can be the center of attention. So many times, nada would get it in her head that *this was an important birthday/anniversary/graduation for a family member, and she would plan a big party where the whole non-nuclear clan had to attend. If they didn't interact with her to plan it, or attend it, it looked like they didn't *care about the 90 year old/ 40th anniversary, etc. It always felt terrible to me, because I could feel the manipulation in these events, that nada didn't really care about the honorees. It was 100% random whether we'd celebrate say, a 54th birthday or a 32d anniversary, or one cousin's graduation from 8th grade. Now I see, it's just if nada was in the mood to get some attention and force all eyes on her. (Does it go without saying that, as the scapegoat child, I never was one of the false honorees?) Scapegoat v/s golden child. This was absolutely central to nada's world. I am scapegoat, sister is golden. It is to exaggerated, truly mentally ill extremes. Never giving a gift/doing a favor without it being some kind of insult or abuse. The last interaction I had with nada, she was posing as doing something nice for me, but it was really meant to show me that my sister was more important than I. (She was giving me some of her very nice, luxury level furniture--but only so that she could redecorate the room even nicer to be my sister's room for her visits.) A lot of the phrases. Exact language nada used--especially 'vivid imagination'. No set schedule of housework/errands. Housework was not a way to teach the kids responsibility or be a family--it was a way for nada to inflict control and abuse. Golden girl was NEVER asked to do housework. Ever. When she moved out, nada even HIRED HER A MAID. I am not kidding. But the rest of us were asked on the spur of the moment, at inconvenient times, when nada could see we were obviously upset--basically whenever nada could invoke the most abuse and get the most of her little rise out of it. And of course, as scapegoat would do the dishes, literally, AS it was happening, nada would moan and groan, 'I never get any help around here...' Giving away our possessions. Nada would have garage sales. People would come for my BEDROOM set--oh, I thought you didn't want that anymore! (And, I am going to sleep--where? One of my biggest accomplishments in adulthood was to buy myself a bed with my own money, that nada could not take away). Actually I could go on for pages and pages with this. But these are the ones that most stand out to me, today. --Charlotte > > Since there have been several new members arriving lately, I'm posting a link to a short article that I found kind of amazing. It lists the characteristics or traits of narcissistic mothers: > > http://sites.google.com/site/harpyschild/ > > Since my nada has been mostly a " Queen " bpd (and a " Witch " bpd) she evidenced many of the traits in this list. > > The designations " Queen " , " Witch " , " Waif " , and " Hermit " bpd come from the book " Understanding The Borderline Mother " by Lawson; the " Queen " bpd has narcissistic pd traits as a co-morbidity, so its like a two-for-one package deal: you get a mom with both borderline pd and narcissistic pd. Randi Kreger, the owner of this Group and author of " The Essential Family Guide to BPD " wrote an article about " UTBM " at the " Psychology Today " website that gives a good summary of the sub-sets that Lawson created: > > http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-walking-eggshells/201109/the-world-the-\ borderline-mother-and-her-children > > Basic breakdown: > > " Hermit " = bpd + avoidant pd > " Waif " = bpd + dependent pd > " Queen " = bpd + narcissistic pd > " Witch " = bpd + antisocial (sociopathic/psychopathic) pd > > > Bottom line: > > A mother with moderate to severe personality disorder *cannot* view her own child as what the child actually is: a separate, unique individual human being with needs, feelings, rights, wishes, dreams, and opinions that might differ from the mother's. The bpd mother, instead, will perceive her child as practically anything else: as her own mother/father, as an extension of her own self, as her possession, as her servant, as her sister/brother, as an idealized projection of her own best traits (golden child), as the carrier of all her own most hated and shameful traits (scapegoat child) as her substitute spouse, as her rescuer, as her best friend, as her hated rival and enemy, as a reincarnation of the child's father (whom she may loathe or idealize), as a chain and anchor around her neck.... etc. > > A mother who cannot perceive and relate to her own child as the unique individual that the child is, is going to damage her child. The severity of the damage varies from case to case. The criteria that define bpd are virtually the anthesis of the definition of a " good enough " mother. > > Lawson recommends early intervention and supervision of mothers with personality disorder to protect their children from psychological damage, or in the most severe cases, the child needs to be removed to a safe environment. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 A wealth of information--again, helping to make sense out of the confusion caused by the BPD. Thank you so much.  I have read some of this before and it's always so helpful to read again. ________________________________ To: WTOAdultChildren1 Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 3:51 PM Subject: Re: Characteristics of Narcissistic Mothers or " Queen " bpd nadas  Thank you so much, Annie--every time you post this, I re-read it, and the longer I am NC, the more it hits home, as I get enough distance to see what really was happening. Just a few that stick out today: Masked insults by insincere congratulations. So many times I would be proud of an accomplishment, and bring it to her for mirroring, and I'd get 'yes, CONGRATULATIONS, CHAR-lie', in an exasperated, sarcastic tone that at once said she was put out and disguested, and not *really impressed...but of course, tone can be denied. Point one of this article is so important because it hits the nail on the head for nadas: insults must always be 'masked' so that they can deny them to outsiders and themselves and, most importantly, to the victim. Parties thrown for non-traditional reasons so that nada can be the center of attention. So many times, nada would get it in her head that *this was an important birthday/anniversary/graduation for a family member, and she would plan a big party where the whole non-nuclear clan had to attend. If they didn't interact with her to plan it, or attend it, it looked like they didn't *care about the 90 year old/ 40th anniversary, etc. It always felt terrible to me, because I could feel the manipulation in these events, that nada didn't really care about the honorees. It was 100% random whether we'd celebrate say, a 54th birthday or a 32d anniversary, or one cousin's graduation from 8th grade. Now I see, it's just if nada was in the mood to get some attention and force all eyes on her. (Does it go without saying that, as the scapegoat child, I never was one of the false honorees?) Scapegoat v/s golden child. This was absolutely central to nada's world. I am scapegoat, sister is golden. It is to exaggerated, truly mentally ill extremes. Never giving a gift/doing a favor without it being some kind of insult or abuse. The last interaction I had with nada, she was posing as doing something nice for me, but it was really meant to show me that my sister was more important than I. (She was giving me some of her very nice, luxury level furniture--but only so that she could redecorate the room even nicer to be my sister's room for her visits.) A lot of the phrases. Exact language nada used--especially 'vivid imagination'. No set schedule of housework/errands. Housework was not a way to teach the kids responsibility or be a family--it was a way for nada to inflict control and abuse. Golden girl was NEVER asked to do housework. Ever. When she moved out, nada even HIRED HER A MAID. I am not kidding. But the rest of us were asked on the spur of the moment, at inconvenient times, when nada could see we were obviously upset--basically whenever nada could invoke the most abuse and get the most of her little rise out of it. And of course, as scapegoat would do the dishes, literally, AS it was happening, nada would moan and groan, 'I never get any help around here...' Giving away our possessions. Nada would have garage sales. People would come for my BEDROOM set--oh, I thought you didn't want that anymore! (And, I am going to sleep--where? One of my biggest accomplishments in adulthood was to buy myself a bed with my own money, that nada could not take away). Actually I could go on for pages and pages with this. But these are the ones that most stand out to me, today. --Charlotte > > Since there have been several new members arriving lately, I'm posting a link to a short article that I found kind of amazing. It lists the characteristics or traits of narcissistic mothers: > > http://sites.google.com/site/harpyschild/ > > Since my nada has been mostly a " Queen " bpd (and a " Witch " bpd) she evidenced many of the traits in this list. > > The designations " Queen " , " Witch " , " Waif " , and " Hermit " bpd come from the book " Understanding The Borderline Mother " by Lawson; the " Queen " bpd has narcissistic pd traits as a co-morbidity, so its like a two-for-one package deal: you get a mom with both borderline pd and narcissistic pd. Randi Kreger, the owner of this Group and author of " The Essential Family Guide to BPD " wrote an article about " UTBM " at the " Psychology Today " website that gives a good summary of the sub-sets that Lawson created: > > http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-walking-eggshells/201109/the-world-the-\ borderline-mother-and-her-children > > Basic breakdown: > > " Hermit " = bpd + avoidant pd > " Waif " = bpd + dependent pd > " Queen " = bpd + narcissistic pd > " Witch " = bpd + antisocial (sociopathic/psychopathic) pd > > > Bottom line: > > A mother with moderate to severe personality disorder *cannot* view her own child as what the child actually is: a separate, unique individual human being with needs, feelings, rights, wishes, dreams, and opinions that might differ from the mother's. The bpd mother, instead, will perceive her child as practically anything else: as her own mother/father, as an extension of her own self, as her possession, as her servant, as her sister/brother, as an idealized projection of her own best traits (golden child), as the carrier of all her own most hated and shameful traits (scapegoat child) as her substitute spouse, as her rescuer, as her best friend, as her hated rival and enemy, as a reincarnation of the child's father (whom she may loathe or idealize), as a chain and anchor around her neck.... etc. > > A mother who cannot perceive and relate to her own child as the unique individual that the child is, is going to damage her child. The severity of the damage varies from case to case. The criteria that define bpd are virtually the anthesis of the definition of a " good enough " mother. > > Lawson recommends early intervention and supervision of mothers with personality disorder to protect their children from psychological damage, or in the most severe cases, the child needs to be removed to a safe environment. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 Reading the " Characteristics.. " document was a life-changing event for me. I had been to a 50th birthday party, a bonfire party in the middle of winter and met someone new, a neighbor who, in passing, mentioned that she didn't get along with her mother. We stood for hours, toasting ourselves in the warmth of the fire and she told me about personality disorders. Funny the things you talk about with strangers, in the dark, in the middle of winter... Serendipitous really. So I went home, started googling and the first thing that I read was this document. My mouth dropped open. I sent it to my brother, who wrote back " This person has met our mother?!? " Things haven't been the same in the few years since. Then I found my way to UTBM and Randi and now I pretty much reckon I have all the answers. Well, the WHAT and WHY of BPD are under control, now I just need to know WHEN and HOW to get nada out of my head. To those who haven't read it yet, good luck and I hope it helps you like it helped me. > > Since there have been several new members arriving lately, I'm posting a link to a short article that I found kind of amazing. It lists the characteristics or traits of narcissistic mothers: > > http://sites.google.com/site/harpyschild/ > > Since my nada has been mostly a " Queen " bpd (and a " Witch " bpd) she evidenced many of the traits in this list. > > The designations " Queen " , " Witch " , " Waif " , and " Hermit " bpd come from the book " Understanding The Borderline Mother " by Lawson; the " Queen " bpd has narcissistic pd traits as a co-morbidity, so its like a two-for-one package deal: you get a mom with both borderline pd and narcissistic pd. Randi Kreger, the owner of this Group and author of " The Essential Family Guide to BPD " wrote an article about " UTBM " at the " Psychology Today " website that gives a good summary of the sub-sets that Lawson created: > > http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-walking-eggshells/201109/the-world-the-\ borderline-mother-and-her-children > > Basic breakdown: > > " Hermit " = bpd + avoidant pd > " Waif " = bpd + dependent pd > " Queen " = bpd + narcissistic pd > " Witch " = bpd + antisocial (sociopathic/psychopathic) pd > > > Bottom line: > > A mother with moderate to severe personality disorder *cannot* view her own child as what the child actually is: a separate, unique individual human being with needs, feelings, rights, wishes, dreams, and opinions that might differ from the mother's. The bpd mother, instead, will perceive her child as practically anything else: as her own mother/father, as an extension of her own self, as her possession, as her servant, as her sister/brother, as an idealized projection of her own best traits (golden child), as the carrier of all her own most hated and shameful traits (scapegoat child) as her substitute spouse, as her rescuer, as her best friend, as her hated rival and enemy, as a reincarnation of the child's father (whom she may loathe or idealize), as a chain and anchor around her neck.... etc. > > A mother who cannot perceive and relate to her own child as the unique individual that the child is, is going to damage her child. The severity of the damage varies from case to case. The criteria that define bpd are virtually the anthesis of the definition of a " good enough " mother. > > Lawson recommends early intervention and supervision of mothers with personality disorder to protect their children from psychological damage, or in the most severe cases, the child needs to be removed to a safe environment. > > -Annie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.