CNBC - Marijuana & Money

[Guest guest]

There was a special of sorts last

night on CNBC, I'm hoping that I can find it to watch again

today, when it's quiet in the house so I can actually hear it

and pay attention.

Part of the news article was about Prop 19 in California, and

something about the legalization of the stuff in Colorado, but

how 9 billion of the 21 billion Marijuana state income (like the

lottery fund stuff) was appropriated from one coffer to balance

the state budget there..

Got some female research scientists (didn't catch her name, and

missed her point, whether it was good or bad in favor the the

medical marijuana standpoint) but did see that she might be

diligently looking for the "FDA testing type proof needed"

rather than anecdotal proofs put forward.. (Probably wouldn't

have hurt had they found the ONE guy who would put it on the

table in the "wrong" wording, as proof that it works on pain..

paraphrased to the tune of.. "Well.. it really doesn't kill the

pain, but it makes me not care that the pain is there"

There was one outstanding point brought forward about Portugal..

and them legalizing all drugs.. regulating the sale and taxing

thereof.. bad scripting when they graphically depicted groups of

people sitting in a town square, firing up their bongs, crack

pipes, and shooting up heroin.. not good for the message the

government was trying to purpose.. but they have in fact, cut

the percentage of young people getting started in the "drug

scene" by I can't remember how many percent..

And it's basically and argument that Prohibition did not work

here in the states in the 20s.. and the continued "marijuana

prohibition" isn't going to be able to continue for much longer

here either..

Well to speak more authoritatively about what I saw.. I'm

actually going to have to watch it again (if they rebroadcast or

I can find it online).. but some of the ideas that I did see,

but can't recall right this second.. did sound theoretically

sound..

I personally feel that medical use.. and I really don't care

what the scientific studies show.. cause as we all know..MS

doesn't affect us all in the same manner, and one medication for

a symptom might work for 50% of us, but not the other 50%.. and

some of us can't take it at all.. so how can they say that they

got the right test group (it would have to be tremendously huge

to encompass those it works for and those it doesn't)... but

they also may eventually come to the same decisions.. that

terminal patients who are in tremendous amounts of pain.. at one

time would not be prescribed the narcotics and other things that

could significantly reduce if not eliminate entirely the

suffering that patient was experiencing.. because "But they

might become addicted to the drug".. and finally got it through

their thick skulls.. that it really really doesn't matter if

that person becomes addicted or not.. what matters is making

them a comfortable as humanly possible throughout their ordeal..

I do know that one or two little (and I do mean so little that

I'm laughed at from time to time) hits and the spasm in my right

leg will stop.. or at the very least become a bearable tugging

sensation... and it will do so in a matter of a couple minutes..

whereas taking a half Keppra will take minimum of half an hour..

and then a lot of the time I've got to add the second half

Keppra and then wait another half hour or longer.. only to find

that dose didn't even reduce the spasm to a tugging sensation..

Who does it really hurt, even if it's only a placebo effect

(somehow I doubt it, in my case), IF it reduces my pain and

improves my quality of life even a little bit.. and if it were

legalized, regulated and taxed.. it would benefit the government

coffers.. If Colorado, and their regulations were to be used as

a model.. 21 billion is an awful lot of money that could

definitely be used to balance a budget...

Just my two sense on something I feel strongly about..

If I find it online anywhere, I'll post a link so that anyone

interested can watch it as well

HUGS

|)onna, who really wishes she lived in one of those 14 or 15

states..

[Guest guest]

A medical marijuana bill was just passed here in Arizona in November. I think it takes effect sometime next year. SharonThis email is a natural hand made product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects. To: "MSersLife " <MSersLife >Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 5:11:18 AMSubject: CNBC - Marijuana & Money

There was a special of sorts last

night on CNBC, I'm hoping that I can find it to watch again

today, when it's quiet in the house so I can actually hear it

and pay attention.

Part of the news article was about Prop 19 in California, and

something about the legalization of the stuff in Colorado, but

how 9 billion of the 21 billion Marijuana state income (like the

lottery fund stuff) was appropriated from one coffer to balance

the state budget there..

Got some female research scientists (didn't catch her name, and

missed her point, whether it was good or bad in favor the the

medical marijuana standpoint) but did see that she might be

diligently looking for the "FDA testing type proof needed"

rather than anecdotal proofs put forward.. (Probably wouldn't

have hurt had they found the ONE guy who would put it on the

table in the "wrong" wording, as proof that it works on pain..

paraphrased to the tune of.. "Well.. it really doesn't kill the

pain, but it makes me not care that the pain is there"

There was one outstanding point brought forward about Portugal..

and them legalizing all drugs.. regulating the sale and taxing

thereof.. bad scripting when they graphically depicted groups of

people sitting in a town square, firing up their bongs, crack

pipes, and shooting up heroin.. not good for the message the

government was trying to purpose.. but they have in fact, cut

the percentage of young people getting started in the "drug

scene" by I can't remember how many percent..

And it's basically and argument that Prohibition did not work

here in the states in the 20s.. and the continued "marijuana

prohibition" isn't going to be able to continue for much longer

here either..

Well to speak more authoritatively about what I saw.. I'm

actually going to have to watch it again (if they rebroadcast or

I can find it online).. but some of the ideas that I did see,

but can't recall right this second.. did sound theoretically

sound..

I personally feel that medical use.. and I really don't care

what the scientific studies show.. cause as we all know..MS

doesn't affect us all in the same manner, and one medication for

a symptom might work for 50% of us, but not the other 50%.. and

some of us can't take it at all.. so how can they say that they

got the right test group (it would have to be tremendously huge

to encompass those it works for and those it doesn't)... but

they also may eventually come to the same decisions.. that

terminal patients who are in tremendous amounts of pain.. at one

time would not be prescribed the narcotics and other things that

could significantly reduce if not eliminate entirely the

suffering that patient was experiencing.. because "But they

might become addicted to the drug".. and finally got it through

their thick skulls.. that it really really doesn't matter if

that person becomes addicted or not.. what matters is making

them a comfortable as humanly possible throughout their ordeal..

I do know that one or two little (and I do mean so little that

I'm laughed at from time to time) hits and the spasm in my right

leg will stop.. or at the very least become a bearable tugging

sensation... and it will do so in a matter of a couple minutes..

whereas taking a half Keppra will take minimum of half an hour..

and then a lot of the time I've got to add the second half

Keppra and then wait another half hour or longer.. only to find

that dose didn't even reduce the spasm to a tugging sensation..

Who does it really hurt, even if it's only a placebo effect

(somehow I doubt it, in my case), IF it reduces my pain and

improves my quality of life even a little bit.. and if it were

legalized, regulated and taxed.. it would benefit the government

coffers.. If Colorado, and their regulations were to be used as

a model.. 21 billion is an awful lot of money that could

definitely be used to balance a budget...

Just my two sense on something I feel strongly about..

If I find it online anywhere, I'll post a link so that anyone

interested can watch it as well

HUGS

|)onna, who really wishes she lived in one of those 14 or 15

states..

[Guest guest]

hopefully it will not fight the federal law - some states do not God, grant me the strength of eagles wings, the faith and courage to fly to new heights, and the wisdom to rely on his spirit to carry me there.

To: MSersLife Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 1:49:20 PMSubject: Re: CNBC - Marijuana & Money

A medical marijuana bill was just passed here in Arizona in November. I think it takes effect sometime next year.

SharonThis email is a natural hand made product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.

To: "MSersLife " <MSersLife >Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 5:11:18 AMSubject: CNBC - Marijuana & MoneyThere was a special of sorts last night on CNBC, I'm hoping that I can find it to watch again today, when it's quiet in the house so I can actually hear it and pay attention.Part of the news article was about Prop 19 in California, and something about the legalization of the stuff in Colorado, but how 9 billion of the 21 billion Marijuana state income (like the lottery fund stuff) was appropriated from one coffer to balance the state budget there.. Got some female research scientists (didn't catch her

name, and missed her point, whether it was good or bad in favor the the medical marijuana standpoint) but did see that she might be diligently looking for the "FDA testing type proof needed" rather than anecdotal proofs put forward.. (Probably wouldn't have hurt had they found the ONE guy who would put it on the table in the "wrong" wording, as proof that it works on pain.. paraphrased to the tune of.. "Well.. it really doesn't kill the pain, but it makes me not care that the pain is there" There was one outstanding point brought forward about Portugal.. and them legalizing all drugs.. regulating the sale and taxing thereof.. bad scripting when they graphically depicted groups of people sitting in a town square, firing up their bongs, crack pipes, and shooting up heroin.. not good for the message the government was trying to purpose.. but they have in fact, cut the percentage of young people getting started in the "drug scene" by I can't

remember how many percent.. And it's basically and argument that Prohibition did not work here in the states in the 20s.. and the continued "marijuana prohibition" isn't going to be able to continue for much longer here either.. Well to speak more authoritatively about what I saw.. I'm actually going to have to watch it again (if they rebroadcast or I can find it online).. but some of the ideas that I did see, but can't recall right this second.. did sound theoretically sound.. I personally feel that medical use.. and I really don't care what the scientific studies show.. cause as we all know..MS doesn't affect us all in the same manner, and one medication for a symptom might work for 50% of us, but not the other 50%.. and some of us can't take it at all.. so how can they say that they got the right test group (it would have to be tremendously huge to encompass those it works for and those it doesn't)... but they also may

eventually come to the same decisions.. that terminal patients who are in tremendous amounts of pain.. at one time would not be prescribed the narcotics and other things that could significantly reduce if not eliminate entirely the suffering that patient was experiencing.. because "But they might become addicted to the drug".. and finally got it through their thick skulls.. that it really really doesn't matter if that person becomes addicted or not.. what matters is making them a comfortable as humanly possible throughout their ordeal.. I do know that one or two little (and I do mean so little that I'm laughed at from time to time) hits and the spasm in my right leg will stop.. or at the very least become a bearable tugging sensation... and it will do so in a matter of a couple minutes.. whereas taking a half Keppra will take minimum of half an hour.. and then a lot of the time I've got to add the second half Keppra and then wait another half

hour or longer.. only to find that dose didn't even reduce the spasm to a tugging sensation.. Who does it really hurt, even if it's only a placebo effect (somehow I doubt it, in my case), IF it reduces my pain and improves my quality of life even a little bit.. and if it were legalized, regulated and taxed.. it would benefit the government coffers.. If Colorado, and their regulations were to be used as a model.. 21 billion is an awful lot of money that could definitely be used to balance a budget...Just my two sense on something I feel strongly about.. If I find it online anywhere, I'll post a link so that anyone interested can watch it as wellHUGS|)onna, who really wishes she lived in one of those 14 or 15 states..

[Guest guest]

Washington state has a medical marijuana law in place. However, since I live in housing which receives funding from the federal government, it is not legal for me to have or grow marijuana for my own use. The problem with our law here is that there are many people who abuse it. I read about one man who was growing more than he was legally allowed to grow. On top of that, he was selling his surplus. But, you want to know who turned him in? It was his son!Years ago, I did research on marijuana. Today's marijuana is stronger, more potent. It takes less to get the same effect. It dulls the pain sensors and can damage brain cells much the same way as alcohol. I just use Benadryl. But, I don't like to because the effects stay with me so long and I have enough problems with brain

fog.Donna in WA

[Guest guest]

I am not against medical marijuana but I voted against Arizona's law because I didn't like the way it was written. I don't think it will work the way the backers intended. I guess we shall see, won't we?I tried pot for pain about 11 years ago. It certainly did not work the same way it did when I was 20. I couldn't stand up and my vertigo was so bad with the pot. I didn't try it again! SharonThis email is a natural hand made product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered

flaws or defects. To: MSersLife Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 1:15:12 PMSubject: Re: CNBC - Marijuana & Money

Washington state has a medical marijuana law in place. However, since I live in housing which receives funding from the federal government, it is not legal for me to have or grow marijuana for my own use. The problem with our law here is that there are many people who abuse it. I read about one man who was growing more than he was legally allowed to grow. On top of that, he was selling his surplus. But, you want to know who turned him in? It was his son!Years ago, I did research on marijuana. Today's marijuana is stronger, more potent. It takes less to get the same effect. It dulls the pain sensors and can damage brain cells much the same way as alcohol. I just use Benadryl. But, I don't like to because the effects stay with me so long and I have enough problems with brain

fog.Donna in WA

[Guest guest]

My ex tried it once and it made him so sick. He couldn't stand up without falling. According to him, it was worse than being drunk. I don't know. I just tried it once when I was in my late teens/early 20s. I don't remember for sure. Benadryl impacts my thinking so much that I just don't feel anything. I can't think. It puts me in a fog so much. The effects last for a good 24 hours. I just can't use it if I have an important meeting or appointment the next day. It does help me sleep and that's the primary reason I take it. But, not every day. Donna in WA

[Guest guest]

That's a

soapbox that.. well I'm going to climb on it.. but not right

here right now.. LOL..

I'm in favor of legalization, with good regulation in place... I

don't want it to be a free for all.. where everybody has a

garden full of it growing in the backyard type deal.. or I walk

into just any doctor's office and say I have an earache in my

eye type deal and he writes a script..

And I agree with Ron & Obama.. if the state has

legalized it or decriminalized it or whatever they want to call

it.. then the DEA/Feds need to keep their noses clear of

anything medically related..

Okay.. now I'm off my low rise soapbox..

HUGS

|)onna

hopefully it will not fight the federal law - some states

do not

God, grant me the strength of eagles wings,

the faith and courage to fly to new heights,

and the wisdom to rely on his spirit to carry me there.

From:

Sharon

To:

MSersLife

Sent: Thu,

December 9, 2010 1:49:20 PM

Subject:

Re: CNBC - Marijuana & Money

A medical marijuana

bill was just passed here in Arizona in November. I

think it takes effect sometime next year.

Sharon

This email is a natural

hand made product. The slight variations in

spelling and grammar enhance its individual

character and beauty and in no way are to be

considered flaws or defects.

From:

|)onna

To:

"MSersLife "

<MSersLife >

Sent:

Thu, December 9, 2010 5:11:18 AM

Subject:

CNBC - Marijuana & Money

There was a

special of sorts last night on CNBC, I'm hoping

that I can find it to watch again today, when

it's quiet in the house so I can actually hear

it and pay attention.

Part of the news article was about Prop 19 in

California, and something about the legalization

of the stuff in Colorado, but how 9 billion of

the 21 billion Marijuana state income (like the

lottery fund stuff) was appropriated from one

coffer to balance the state budget there..

Got some female research scientists (didn't

catch her name, and missed her point, whether it

was good or bad in favor the the medical

marijuana standpoint) but did see that she might

be diligently looking for the "FDA testing type

proof needed" rather than anecdotal proofs put

forward.. (Probably wouldn't have hurt had they

found the ONE guy who would put it on the table

in the "wrong" wording, as proof that it works

on pain.. paraphrased to the tune of.. "Well..

it really doesn't kill the pain, but it makes me

not care that the pain is there"

There was one outstanding point brought forward

about Portugal.. and them legalizing all drugs..

regulating the sale and taxing thereof.. bad

scripting when they graphically depicted groups

of people sitting in a town square, firing up

their bongs, crack pipes, and shooting up

heroin.. not good for the message the government

was trying to purpose.. but they have in fact,

cut the percentage of young people getting

started in the "drug scene" by I can't remember

how many percent..

And it's basically and argument that Prohibition

did not work here in the states in the 20s.. and

the continued "marijuana prohibition" isn't

going to be able to continue for much longer

here either..

Well to speak more authoritatively about what I

saw.. I'm actually going to have to watch it

again (if they rebroadcast or I can find it

online).. but some of the ideas that I did see,

but can't recall right this second.. did sound

theoretically sound..

I personally feel that medical use.. and I

really don't care what the scientific studies

show.. cause as we all know..MS doesn't affect

us all in the same manner, and one medication

for a symptom might work for 50% of us, but not

the other 50%.. and some of us can't take it at

all.. so how can they say that they got the

right test group (it would have to be

tremendously huge to encompass those it works

for and those it doesn't)... but they also may

eventually come to the same decisions.. that

terminal patients who are in tremendous amounts

of pain.. at one time would not be prescribed

the narcotics and other things that could

significantly reduce if not eliminate entirely

the suffering that patient was experiencing..

because "But they might become addicted to the

drug".. and finally got it through their thick

skulls.. that it really really doesn't matter if

that person becomes addicted or not.. what

matters is making them a comfortable as humanly

possible throughout their ordeal..

I do know that one or two little (and I do mean

so little that I'm laughed at from time to time)

hits and the spasm in my right leg will stop..

or at the very least become a bearable tugging

sensation... and it will do so in a matter of a

couple minutes.. whereas taking a half Keppra

will take minimum of half an hour.. and then a

lot of the time I've got to add the second half

Keppra and then wait another half hour or

longer.. only to find that dose didn't even

reduce the spasm to a tugging sensation..

Who does it really hurt, even if it's only a

placebo effect (somehow I doubt it, in my case),

IF it reduces my pain and improves my quality of

life even a little bit.. and if it were

legalized, regulated and taxed.. it would

benefit the government coffers.. If Colorado,

and their regulations were to be used as a

model.. 21 billion is an awful lot of money that

could definitely be used to balance a budget...

Just my two sense on something I feel strongly

about..

If I find it online anywhere, I'll post a link

so that anyone interested can watch it as well

HUGS

|)onna, who really wishes she lived in one of

those 14 or 15 states..

--

Help Feed The Critters!

Your daily click counts at

http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/clickToGive/

[Guest guest]

I bad God, grant me the strength of eagles wings, the faith and courage to fly to new heights, and the wisdom to rely on his spirit to carry me there.

To: MSersLife Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 10:32:32 AMSubject: Re: CNBC - Marijuana & Money

That's a soapbox that.. well I'm going to climb on it.. but not right here right now.. LOL.. I'm in favor of legalization, with good regulation in place... I don't want it to be a free for all.. where everybody has a garden full of it growing in the backyard type deal.. or I walk into just any doctor's office and say I have an earache in my eye type deal and he writes a script.. And I agree with Ron & Obama.. if the state has legalized it or decriminalized it or whatever they want to call it.. then the DEA/Feds need to keep their noses clear of anything medically related.. Okay.. now I'm off my low rise soapbox.. HUGS|)onna

hopefully it will not fight the federal law - some states do not God, grant me the strength of eagles wings, the faith and courage to fly to new heights, and the wisdom to rely on his spirit to carry me there.

To: MSersLife Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 1:49:20 PMSubject: Re: CNBC - Marijuana & Money

A medical marijuana bill was just passed here in Arizona in November. I think it takes effect sometime next year.

SharonThis email is a natural hand made product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.

To: "MSersLife " <MSersLife >Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 5:11:18 AMSubject: CNBC - Marijuana & MoneyThere was a special of sorts last night on CNBC, I'm hoping that I can find it to watch

again today, when it's quiet in the house so I can actually hear it and pay attention.Part of the news article was about Prop 19 in California, and something about the legalization of the stuff in Colorado, but how 9 billion of the 21 billion Marijuana state income (like the lottery fund stuff) was appropriated from one coffer to balance the state budget there.. Got some female research scientists (didn't catch her name, and missed her point, whether it was good or bad in favor the the medical marijuana standpoint) but did see that she might be diligently looking for the "FDA testing type proof needed" rather than anecdotal proofs put forward.. (Probably wouldn't have hurt had they found the ONE guy who would put it on the table in the "wrong" wording, as proof that it works on pain.. paraphrased to the tune of.. "Well.. it really doesn't kill the pain, but it makes me not care that the pain is there" There was one outstanding

point brought forward about Portugal.. and them legalizing all drugs.. regulating the sale and taxing thereof.. bad scripting when they graphically depicted groups of people sitting in a town square, firing up their bongs, crack pipes, and shooting up heroin.. not good for the message the government was trying to purpose.. but they have in fact, cut the percentage of young people getting started in the "drug scene" by I can't remember how many percent.. And it's basically and argument that Prohibition did not work here in the states in the 20s.. and the continued "marijuana prohibition" isn't going to be able to continue for much longer here either.. Well to speak more authoritatively about what I saw.. I'm actually going to have to watch it again (if they rebroadcast or I can find it online).. but some of the ideas that I did see, but can't recall right this second.. did sound theoretically sound.. I personally feel that medical

use.. and I really don't care what the scientific studies show.. cause as we all know..MS doesn't affect us all in the same manner, and one medication for a symptom might work for 50% of us, but not the other 50%.. and some of us can't take it at all.. so how can they say that they got the right test group (it would have to be tremendously huge to encompass those it works for and those it doesn't)... but they also may eventually come to the same decisions.. that terminal patients who are in tremendous amounts of pain.. at one time would not be prescribed the narcotics and other things that could significantly reduce if not eliminate entirely the suffering that patient was experiencing.. because "But they might become addicted to the drug".. and finally got it through their thick skulls.. that it really really doesn't matter if that person becomes addicted or not.. what matters is making them a comfortable as humanly possible throughout their ordeal..

I do know that one or two little (and I do mean so little that I'm laughed at from time to time) hits and the spasm in my right leg will stop.. or at the very least become a bearable tugging sensation... and it will do so in a matter of a couple minutes.. whereas taking a half Keppra will take minimum of half an hour.. and then a lot of the time I've got to add the second half Keppra and then wait another half hour or longer.. only to find that dose didn't even reduce the spasm to a tugging sensation.. Who does it really hurt, even if it's only a placebo effect (somehow I doubt it, in my case), IF it reduces my pain and improves my quality of life even a little bit.. and if it were legalized, regulated and taxed.. it would benefit the government coffers.. If Colorado, and their regulations were to be used as a model.. 21 billion is an awful lot of money that could definitely be used to balance a budget...Just my two sense on

something I feel strongly about.. If I find it online anywhere, I'll post a link so that anyone interested can watch it as wellHUGS|)onna, who really wishes she lived in one of those 14 or 15 states..

-- Help Feed The Critters! Your daily click counts at http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/clickToGive/

1 of 1 Photo(s)

[Guest guest]

actually I prefer a sage brush decorated for the season - my reiki master hung crystals on hers for Christmas and other holidays - ornaments and crystals God, grant me the strength of eagles wings, the faith and courage to fly to new heights, and the wisdom to rely on his spirit to carry me there.

To: MSersLife Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 10:57:07 AMSubject: Re: CNBC - Marijuana & Money

Hey.. that works for me too... what a versatile plant that can be!! LOLHUGS|)onna

I bad God, grant me the strength of eagles wings, the faith and courage to fly to new heights, and the wisdom to rely on his spirit to carry me there.

[Guest guest]

Donna,

Unfortunately, I live in the Puritanical state of PA.. where

even though there are a couple of Bills out there to be passed

(Senate Bill is the most concise though).. we will probably be

one of the last, if not the last of the 50 to pass the law.. at

least it's been proposed..

If I could have gotten my mother to agree, back in 1998, to just

hitting 1 joint, just a little bit even.. I would have happily

stood in the middle of downtown Pittsburgh, proclaiming loudly

my need to by a little bit of grass... cause the super expensive

prescription stuff was doing nothing for her except stop the

nausea.. she wouldn't eat..

I guess I best stop myself.. climb down off my soapbox,

apologize to everyone.. and say.. I'm not opposed to medical

marijuana and leave it go at that.. but I'm pretty sure I've

found the topic, for that book/essay/article/blog or whatever it

is I wanted to write to find out IF I could write.. LOL..

Something that could.... AHHHHHHH.. I hate brain warts.. what's

the word for "move me to create a passion in me"...

MARION!!!!!!!!!! I think I'm going to need your help!!! LOL...

seriously though..

HUGS

|)onna.. who DID remember to call the refill in on her

Wellbutrin.. the one thing that kept her roller coaster under

control.. but then again.. maybe the roller coaster is just what

the doctor order to get me motivated again... LOL

Washington state has

a medical marijuana law in place. However, since I live

in housing which receives funding from the federal

government, it is not legal for me to have or grow

marijuana for my own use. The problem with our law here

is that there are many people who abuse it. I read about

one man who was growing more than he was legally allowed

to grow. On top of that, he was selling his surplus.

But, you want to know who turned him in? It was his son!

Years ago, I did research on marijuana. Today's

marijuana is stronger, more potent. It takes less to get

the same effect. It dulls the pain sensors and can damage

brain cells much the same way as alcohol. I just use

Benadryl. But, I don't like to because the effects stay

with me so long and I have enough problems with brain fog.

Donna in WA