Guest guest Posted May 6, 2002 Report Share Posted May 6, 2002 > This came up here a while back where I'd read magnesium > was destroyed in milk that was in clear containers. > The fluorescent lights were the culprit. This is known as waxed > cardboard half gallons list magnesium in the nutrition panel > and clears don't have it. Hi Wanita: Please tell me how the magnesium is destroyed by light. Chi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2002 Report Share Posted May 6, 2002 At 11:42 PM 5/5/02 +0000, you wrote: > >> This came up here a while back where I'd read magnesium >> was destroyed in milk that was in clear containers. >> The fluorescent lights were the culprit. This is known as waxed >> cardboard half gallons list magnesium in the nutrition panel >> and clears don't have it. > >Hi Wanita: >Please tell me how the magnesium is destroyed by light. >Chi > Hi Chi, Alec said its the fluorescent wavelength emissions. What I read didn't say other than it was so, so I checked the containers. In our previous discussion Dennis, who does food lab analysis felt that magnesium was unstable enough for it to be fluorescent light sensitive. Remember the first grocery stores here being kind of dark near dairy but that was before fluorescent lighting. Think I see where you're going to. What does the light do to vegetable's magnesium content as they're wide open to light? Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 > >> This came up here a while back where I'd read magnesium > >> was destroyed in milk that was in clear containers. > >> The fluorescent lights were the culprit. This is known as waxed > >> cardboard half gallons list magnesium in the nutrition panel > >> and clears don't have it. > > > >Hi Wanita: > >Please tell me how the magnesium is destroyed by light. > >Chi > > > Hi Chi, > Alec said its the fluorescent wavelength emissions. What I read didn't say > other than it was so, so I checked the containers. In our previous discussion > Dennis, who does food lab analysis felt that magnesium was unstable enough for > it to be fluorescent light sensitive. Remember the first grocery stores here > being kind of dark near dairy but that was before fluorescent lighting. > Think I > see where you're going to. What does the light do to vegetable's magnesium > content as they're wide open to light? > Wanita Wanita I was involved in the magnesium (Mg) discussion relative to digestion of cellulose in wheatgrass. I indicated Mg is present in chlorophyll molecule and I went along with the above thought because light destroys chlorophyll. My reasoning being cut green grass doesn't stay green very long. So it's reactive in light. That wouldn't be elemental Mg but molecular Mg that I was referring to(in chlorophyll).......Now that I'm considering Mg in milk I'm wondering what form of Mg would be in milk. It wouldn't be elemental. It would be a salt I suppose. Like Mg Phosphate or something. The Merck Index indicates Mg (elemental) slowly oxidizes in moist air so it is reactive. Anyone know what compound/molecule of Mg would be in milk. Sorry for the confusion. Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 >From: " dkemnitz2000 " <dkemnitz2000@...> >Now that I'm considering Mg in milk I'm wondering >what form of Mg would be in milk. It wouldn't be elemental. It >would be a salt I suppose. Like Mg Phosphate or something. The Merck >Index indicates Mg (elemental) slowly oxidizes in moist air so it is >reactive. Anyone know what compound/molecule of Mg would be in milk. If Magnesium is present in milk as a salt, then it must already be oxidized, since the metals in salts are oxidized by definition. Also, the salt would have to be dissolved (otherwise it would sink to the bottom), so the Magnesium ions would be floating around by themselves. I can only think of two reasons why light might " destroy " the Magnesium in milk. The first is the one that's already been expressed--that it might be in some organic compound which could be changed into another compound which would make the Magnesium inaccessible, but I think this unlikely. Alternatively, I've seen it claimed that calciferol, the form of vitamin D added to processed milk, binds to Magnesium, preventing its absorption. It could be that light provides the energy necessary for this reaction to take place. Of course, this wouldn't be an issue with raw milk. _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 > >From: " dkemnitz2000 " <dkemnitz2000@y...> > > >Now that I'm considering Mg in milk I'm wondering > >what form of Mg would be in milk. It wouldn't be elemental. It > >would be a salt I suppose. Like Mg Phosphate or something. The Merck > >Index indicates Mg (elemental) slowly oxidizes in moist air so it is > >reactive. Anyone know what compound/molecule of Mg would be in milk. > > If Magnesium is present in milk as a salt, then it must already be oxidized, > since the metals in salts are oxidized by definition. Also, the salt would > have to be dissolved (otherwise it would sink to the bottom), so the > Magnesium ions would be floating around by themselves. > > I can only think of two reasons why light might " destroy " the Magnesium in > milk. The first is the one that's already been expressed--that it might be > in some organic compound which could be changed into another compound which > would make the Magnesium inaccessible, but I think this unlikely. > Alternatively, I've seen it claimed that calciferol, the form of vitamin D > added to processed milk, binds to Magnesium, preventing its absorption. It > could be that light provides the energy necessary for this reaction to take > place. Of course, this wouldn't be an issue with raw milk. > have you had kinetics? I took physical chem about 1/2 semester. It wasn't required for my major so about 1/2 way thru the semester I dropped. Kinetics are awesome but I know little about this Mg in milk reaction. Anyway the reaction goes both ways so there probably could be ionized Mg. I don't know so I want you all to know up front this is a guess on my part. Dennis > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.