Guest guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):930-4. Impact on patient outcomes after closure of an adjacent trauma center. Yaghoubian A, RJ, Putnam BA, De Virgilio C. Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California 90509, USA. In 2005, a major Level I trauma center closed in Los Angeles County, leading to media speculation that the sudden expansion of our catchment area would adversely affect outcome. We sought to determine whether the closure led to longer transport times and increased trauma morbidity and mortality at our Level I trauma center. Annual patient volume, paramedic transport times, injury severity score (ISS), mechanism of injury, complication rate, and mortality were retrospectively compared between two time periods, Period 1 (1997-2005, before closure) and Period 2 (March 1, 2005 to March 1, 2006, after closure), using multivariable logistic regression models. Median monthly patient volume rose from 123 patients to 190 patients in Period 2 (P < 0.01). Median transport time increased from 12 to 13 minutes (P = 0.004) and median ISS increased from four to five (P < 0.01) in Period 2. The proportion of patients with ISS > 15 increased from 17 to 24 per cent as well (P < 0.01). After accounting injury severity, the adjusted mortality rate decreased in Period 2 (odds ratio 0.69, P = 0.03) and the adjusted complication rate was unchanged (odds ratio 1.16, P = 0.2). In conclusion, the closure of a Level I trauma center resulted in a significant increase in trauma patient volume and injury severity, as well as a slight increase in paramedic transport times. However, the adjusted complication rate was unchanged, and the adjusted mortality rate actually improved. Best line: " ...and the adjusted mortality rate improved. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 > > Best line: " ...and the adjusted mortality rate improved. " > Deads dead aint it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 I am not sure how this is evidence against the golden hour. I believe the increase in median transport time was only approximately 1 minute. It may actually support the theory that an increase in volume at one center gives the faculty and staff more repetition and experience in dealing with these types of emergencies. Bill Dunne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.