Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I need help with this question: What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the Director, but who else is covered? This question was posed to me by a coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer. Also, I've recently posted about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no interest. I have made a couple of postings, but have had very little if any discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we are underappreciated. Thank you for any assistance you can provide.. Sr. NREMT-P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 Hi, . Welcome to the list and to EMS. Since no one else has attempted to answer your posts, I will address part of it - Gene or Wes or any of the other lawyers on here can correct me if I am wrong or incomplete - but I will leave the DEA documentation to someone else. I know what I have always done in my services or seen done, but I couldn't quote you the exact law to review on that part. As for the HIPAA, FIRST basically ANYONE who DOES have a right to know to continue patient care until the patient is released from care has a right to read your chart. So anyone working in the hospital, nursing home, rehab center, whatever who is continuing to care for the patient and needs the information to continue to care for the patient by knowing " start to now " type things has a right to read the chart without asking anyone. In your service, the EMS Director, the QA/QI committee, the billing agent, and the Medical Director have the right to read your chart without permission. If the oncoming crew is not doing QA or doesn't need to look at your chart to see what supplies or equipment you used or anything else, they really don't have a right to read it. However, they are covered by their HIPAA agreement that should be signed with the service when they are hired so if it is in the drawer and they read it, they are bound by the privacy rules. Anyone who walks into that EMS office other than those listed here are NOT allowed to view the chart even on the computer screen where you are typing it in, which means steps must be taken to ensure that no unauthorized person can see the screen while you are typing in the chart, can't access the part of the computer where charts are stored to view them, can't easily access an unfirewalled computer from the net to read them,can't see the chart lying up on the desk, etc etc. Board members for the service should not generally have access to files or charts because it is not necessary for them to review them for patient care. However, issues could arise on an individual basis where a patient may have to be discussed in a Board meeting or administrative meeting above the Director (such as a patient who is abusing the system for instance) so Board members should be trained in HIPAA and sign an agreement for those situations. But they would have to be handled in a private special session that does NOT include general public in attendance. A patient generally has a right to see their own records. (However, I read recently that case law has supported for HOSPITALS that a patient's records do not belong to THEM but to the hospital. I don't know where that leaves EMS - Gene or Wes would have to answer that one.) Someone's verified legal guardian or medical power of attorney person has a right when the patient is too young or is incompacitated mentally - they serve as the patient would. (Make a copy of the PROOF that they have that right, such as the parent's drivers license or the medical power of attorney document.) A patient's lawyer does if they produce a signed release by the patient. Law enforcement ONLY has access to whatever information contained in the chart or about the patient when it relates to an immediate threat to public health or an immediate life-threatening crisis that could cause someone death or immediate harm if they information is delayed waiting on a subpoena. Other than that, nothing can be discussed with law enforcement or judges or other lawyers except under court order or subpoena or signed patient release specifically stating that purpose. Now here is where MOST people fall down on the job in my opinion. ANY release of that chart (except at the receiving facility where you leave the patient or for standard billing of the run) MUST be documented and kept on file for patient or legal guardian review upon demand. In other words, if a patient's lawyer has a release to get a copy of the chart, the release needs to be kept and the attorney's name and such placed on the list with the date. If the receiving hospitals' Trauma Coordinator swears she did not get a copy of the chart and needs a copy, I would place that release on the list. Even if the PATIENT or his/her legal guardian wants a copy of the chart, put it on the list. That is all that is popping into my brain yet on a Sunday morning without having had a full cup of cappucino yet. LOL Jane Dinsmore To: texasems-l@...: daniel.murphy@...: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:20:01 +0000Subject: HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems... This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no interest. I have made a couple of postings, but have had very little if any discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we are underappreciated.Thank you for any assistance you can provide.. Sr. NREMT-P _________________________________________________________________ Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 thank you jane.. that was very educational and much appreciated... Memento Mori... Sr. HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems... This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no interest. I have made a couple of postings, but have had very little if any discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we are underappreciated. Thank you for any assistance you can provide.. Sr. NREMT-P ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live http://clk.atdmt. com/MRT/go/ 119462413/ direct/01/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 just thought of another question that may help to clarify this further.. does a shift supervisor or anyone else (from another shift) have the right to review every pcr for " errors " and/or proper treatment when they had zero involvement in patient care? Memento Mori... Sr. HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems... This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no interest. I have made a couple of postings, but have had very little if any discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we are underappreciated. Thank you for any assistance you can provide.. Sr. NREMT-P ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live http://clk.atdmt. com/MRT/go/ 119462413/ direct/01/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 You are welcome, . Jane To: texasems-l@...: daniel.murphy@...: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:26:44 -0800Subject: Re: HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems... thank you jane.. that was very educational and much appreciated... Memento Mori... Sr. HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems...This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no interest. I have made a couple of postings, but havehad very little if any discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we are underappreciated. Thank you for any assistance you can provide.. Sr. NREMT-P ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Livehttp://clk.atdmt. com/MRT/go/ 119462413/ direct/01/[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 If that is the shift supervisor's job description or part of the QA/QI process, yes. If they are doing it just for the purpose of reading the report, then no. Jane Dinsmore To: texasems-l@...: daniel.murphy@...: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:28:00 -0800Subject: Re: HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems... just thought of another question that may help to clarify this further.. does a shift supervisor or anyone else (from another shift) have the right to review every pcr for " errors " and/or proper treatment when they had zero involvement in patient care? Memento Mori... Sr. HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems...This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no interest. I have made a couple of postings, but havehad very little if any discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we are underappreciated. Thank you for any assistance you can provide.. Sr. NREMT-P ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Livehttp://clk.atdmt. com/MRT/go/ 119462413/ direct/01/[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 Jane's explanation is quite correct. I'll add these things to tie up loose ends. The actual record always belongs to the service/hospital. However, those entitled to access have the right to inspect the records at reasonable times and to copy them. The service may charge a reasonable fee for copying. A log of each disclosure other than for the ones that need no authorization (for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations, and in certain cases of emergency when law enforcement has an immediate need to know) must be maintained and kept for a minimum of 6 years. Any subject of records has a right to an accounting of all uses of records for the past 6 years, so a log must be kept. It is prudent to list every disclosure outside the agency on the log. The question of other crew members not involved in the care having access to the records is not quite so simple. As Jane correctly says, every employee with even possible access to records must sign a Confidentiality Agreement in which they agree to abide by HIPAA's rules. There are legitimate reasons why other crews might have a legitimate interest in a patient's records. Example: The patient is a frequent flyer and has some sort of chronic condition, and this time there was something different about the patient's complaint indicating a change in baseline, et cetera. This info could be important to other crews that might also be responding to this patient. Further, case reports can be pulled for CE, but in those cases there generally is no reason for the patient to be identified, so all identifying information should be redacted from those records before use in a CE or QA situation. I'll be happy to answer other questions if need be. Gene Gandy, JD, LP > > > Hi, . Welcome to the list and to EMS. Since no one else has attempted > to answer your posts, I will address part of it - Gene or Wes or any of the > other lawyers on here can correct me if I am wrong or incomplete - but I will > leave the DEA documentation to someone else. I know what I have always done > in my services or seen done, but I couldn't quote you the exact law to review > on that part. > > As for the HIPAA, FIRST basically ANYONE who DOES have a right to know to > continue patient care until the patient is released from care has a right to > read your chart. So anyone working in the hospital, nursing home, rehab center, > whatever who is continuing to care for the patient and needs the information > to continue to care for the patient by knowing " start to now " type things > has a right to read the chart without asking anyone. In your service, the EMS > Director, the QA/QI committee, the billing agent, and the Medical Director > have the right to read your chart without permission. If the oncoming crew is > not doing QA or doesn't need to look at your chart to see what supplies or > equipment you used or anything else, they really don't have a right to read it. > However, they are covered by their HIPAA agreement that should be signed with > the service when they are hired so if it is in the drawer and they read it, > they are bound by the privacy rules. Anyone who walks into that EMS office > other than those listed here are NOT allowed to view the chart even on the > computer screen where you are typing it in, which means steps must be taken to > ensure that no unauthorized person can see the screen while you are typing in > the chart, can't access the part of the computer where charts are stored to > view them, can't easily access an unfirewalled computer from the net to read > them,can't see the chart lying up on the desk, etc etc. Board members for the > service should not generally have access to files or charts because it is not > necessary for them to review them for patient care. However, issues could > arise on an individual basis where a patient may have to be discussed in a Board > meeting or administrative meeting above the Director (such as a patient who > is abusing the system for instance) so Board members should be trained in > HIPAA and sign an agreement for those situations. But they would have to be > handled in a private special session that does NOT include general public in > attendance. > > A patient generally has a right to see their own records. (However, I read > recently that case law has supported for HOSPITALS that a patient's records do > not belong to THEM but to the hospital. I don't know where that leaves EMS - > Gene or Wes would have to answer that one.) Someone's verified legal > guardian or medical power of attorney person has a right when the patient is too > young or is incompacitated mentally - they serve as the patient would. (Make a > copy of the PROOF that they have that right, such as the parent's drivers > license or the medical power of attorney document.) A patient's lawyer does if > they produce a signed release by the patient. Law enforcement ONLY has access > to whatever information contained in the chart or about the patient when it > relates to an immediate threat to public health or an immediate > life-threatening crisis that could cause someone death or immediate harm if they information > is delayed waiting on a subpoena. Other than that, nothing can be discussed > with law enforcement or judges or other lawyers except under court order or > subpoena or signed patient release specifically stating that purpose. > > Now here is where MOST people fall down on the job in my opinion. ANY > release of that chart (except at the receiving facility where you leave the patient > or for standard billing of the run) MUST be documented and kept on file for > patient or legal guardian review upon demand. In other words, if a patient's > lawyer has a release to get a copy of the chart, the release needs to be kept > and the attorney's name and such placed on the list with the date. If the > receiving hospitals' Trauma Coordinator swears she did not get a copy of the > chart and needs a copy, I would place that release on the list. Even if the > PATIENT or his/her legal guardian wants a copy of the chart, put it on the list. > > That is all that is popping into my brain yet on a Sunday morning without > having had a full cup of cappucino yet. LOL > > Jane Dinsmore > > To: texasems-l@yahoogrotexasems-l@: daniel.murphy@...: Sat, 8 Nov > 2008 00:20:01 +0000Subject: HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems... > > This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a > clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of > that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I > need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA > violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned > in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote > on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the > QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the > Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a > coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted > about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is > this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no > interest. I have made a couple of postings, but have had very little if any > discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. > Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, > I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of > your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a > ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 > years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard > children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I > can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore > UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what > we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we > are underappreciated. This is probably an easy question to answer, but I > can't seem to find a > > ____________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ > Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live > http://clk.atdmt.http://clk.http://clkhttp://clk > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 Yes. That's a function of healthcare operations. G > > just thought of another question that may help to clarify this further.. > does a shift supervisor or anyone else (from another shift) have the right to > review every pcr for " errors " and/or proper treatment when they had zero > involvement in patient care? > Â Memento Mori... > > Sr. > > HIPPA as it relates to EMS > Systems... > > This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a > clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of > that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I > need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA > violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned > in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote > on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the > QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the > Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a > coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted > about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is > this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no intere > st. I have made a couple of postings, but have > had very little if any discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, > please feel free to let me know. Also let me say that i appreciate the > discussions that are generated on here, I've learned to look at things from a > different perspective based on some of your replies, and have recently discovered > Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a ton of useful information. As I am > relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 years total), I am slowly learning that we are > pretty much " the bastard children " fortunately there are people like Dr. > Bledsoe and others whose names I can't recall off the top of my head, who truly > care about EMS and furthermore UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what > we do, and the NECESSITY of what we do, we can all hold our heads high and be > proud of who we are, even if we are underappreciated. Thank you for any > assistance you can provide.. Sr. NREMT-P > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ > Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live > http://clk.atdmt. com/MRT/go/ 119462413/ direct/01/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 Thanks, Gene. It is good to see YOU took your gingko today. LOL Jane To: texasems-l@...: wegandy1938@...: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:19:46 -0500Subject: Re: HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems... Jane's explanation is quite correct. I'll add these things to tie up loose ends. The actual record always belongs to the service/hospital. However, those entitled to access have the right to inspect the records at reasonable times and to copy them. The service may charge a reasonable fee for copying.A log of each disclosure other than for the ones that need no authorization (for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations, and in certain cases of emergency when law enforcement has an immediate need to know) must be maintained and kept for a minimum of 6 years. Any subject of records has a right to an accounting of all uses of records for the past 6 years, so a log must be kept. It is prudent to list every disclosure outside the agency on the log.The question of other crew members not involved in the care having access to the records is not quite so simple. As Jane correctly says, every employee with even possible access to records must sign a Confidentiality Agreement in which they agree to abide by HIPAA's rules. There are legitimate reasons why other crews might have a legitimate interest in a patient's records. Example: The patient is a frequent flyer and has some sort of chronic condition, and this time there was something different about the patient's complaint indicating a change in baseline, et cetera. This info could be important to other crews that might also be responding to this patient. Further, case reports can be pulled for CE, but in those cases there generally is no reason for the patient to be identified, so all identifying information should be redacted from those records before use in a CE or QA situation.I'll be happy to answer other questions if need be.Gene Gandy, JD, LPIn a message dated 11/9/08 7:35:52 AM, texas.paramedic@... writes:> > > Hi, . Welcome to the list and to EMS. Since no one else has attempted > to answer your posts, I will address part of it - Gene or Wes or any of the > other lawyers on here can correct me if I am wrong or incomplete - but I will > leave the DEA documentation to someone else. I know what I have always done > in my services or seen done, but I couldn't quote you the exact law to review > on that part.> > As for the HIPAA, FIRST basically ANYONE who DOES have a right to know to > continue patient care until the patient is released from care has a right to > read your chart. So anyone working in the hospital, nursing home, rehab center, > whatever who is continuing to care for the patient and needs the information > to continue to care for the patient by knowing " start to now " type things > has a right to read the chart without asking anyone. In your service, the EMS > Director, the QA/QI committee, the billing agent, and the Medical Director > have the right to read your chart without permission. If the oncoming crew is > not doing QA or doesn't need to look at your chart to see what supplies or > equipment you used or anything else, they really don't have a right to read it. > However, they are covered by their HIPAA agreement that should be signed with > the service when they are hired so if it is in the drawer and they read it, > they are bound by the privacy rules. Anyone who walks into that EMS office > other than those listed here are NOT allowed to view the chart even on the > computer screen where you are typing it in, which means steps must be taken to > ensure that no unauthorized person can see the screen while you are typing in > the chart, can't access the part of the computer where charts are stored to > view them, can't easily access an unfirewalled computer from the net to read > them,can't see the chart lying up on the desk, etc etc. Board members for the > service should not generally have access to files or charts because it is not > necessary for them to review them for patient care. However, issues could > arise on an individual basis where a patient may have to be discussed in a Board > meeting or administrative meeting above the Director (such as a patient who > is abusing the system for instance) so Board members should be trained in > HIPAA and sign an agreement for those situations. But they would have to be > handled in a private special session that does NOT include general public in > attendance.> > A patient generally has a right to see their own records. (However, I read > recently that case law has supported for HOSPITALS that a patient's records do > not belong to THEM but to the hospital. I don't know where that leaves EMS - > Gene or Wes would have to answer that one.) Someone's verified legal > guardian or medical power of attorney person has a right when the patient is too > young or is incompacitated mentally - they serve as the patient would. (Make a > copy of the PROOF that they have that right, such as the parent's drivers > license or the medical power of attorney document.) A patient's lawyer does if > they produce a signed release by the patient. Law enforcement ONLY has access > to whatever information contained in the chart or about the patient when it > relates to an immediate threat to public health or an immediate > life-threatening crisis that could cause someone death or immediate harm if they information > is delayed waiting on a subpoena. Other than that, nothing can be discussed > with law enforcement or judges or other lawyers except under court order or > subpoena or signed patient release specifically stating that purpose.> > Now here is where MOST people fall down on the job in my opinion. ANY > release of that chart (except at the receiving facility where you leave the patient > or for standard billing of the run) MUST be documented and kept on file for > patient or legal guardian review upon demand. In other words, if a patient's > lawyer has a release to get a copy of the chart, the release needs to be kept > and the attorney's name and such placed on the list with the date. If the > receiving hospitals' Trauma Coordinator swears she did not get a copy of the > chart and needs a copy, I would place that release on the list. Even if the > PATIENT or his/her legal guardian wants a copy of the chart, put it on the list.> > That is all that is popping into my brain yet on a Sunday morning without > having had a full cup of cappucino yet. LOL> > Jane Dinsmore> > To: texasems-l@yahoogrotexasems-l@: daniel.murphy@...: Sat, 8 Nov > 2008 00:20:01 +0000Subject: HIPPA as it relates to EMS Systems...> > This is probably an easy question to answer, but I can't seem to find a > clear answer, sooooooooo I am again forwarding this to the only persons I know of > that have the collective knowledge of a paragod.. lol.. Seriously though I > need help with this question:What can and cannot be considered a HIPPA > violation as it relates to patient care reports that have been completed and " turned > in. " To clarify further who exactly is authorized to read a PCR that I wrote > on pt. so and so on say October 2, 2008? I understand that obviously the > QA/QI committee is privy to this information for obvious reasons, and likely the > Director, but who else is covered?This question was posed to me by a > coworker and I hope to give him/her a definitive answer.Also, I've recently posted > about FDA/DPS/DEA narcotic documentation and have yet to see an answer. Is > this something that cannot be answered, or is it something that is of no > interest. I have made a couple of postings, but have had very little if any > discussion about them. If I am incorrectly posting, please feel free to let me know. > Also let me say that i appreciate the discussions that are generated on here, > I've learned to look at things from a different perspective based on some of > your replies, and have recently discovered Dr. Bledsoe's website which has a > ton of useful information. As I am relatively new to EMS (approximately 3 > years total), I am slowly learning that we are pretty much " the bastard > children " fortunately there are people like Dr. Bledsoe and others whose names I > can't recall off the top of my head, who truly care about EMS and furthermore > UNDERSTANDS what we do, the importance of what we do, and the NECESSITY of what > we do, we can all hold our heads high and be proud of who we are, even if we > are underappreciated. This is probably an easy question to answer, but I > can't seem to find a> > ____________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________> Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live> http://clk.atdmt.http://clk.http://clkhttp://clk> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> > **************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other Holiday needs. Search Now. (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://\ searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear0\ 0000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.