Bls: Re: yipppeeeeee!!! (e-mail from WA mom on surfactants)

[Guest guest]

Rita,

Does LDM100 works the same way as Immusist? Which one's more worth the money?

Rgrds,

Fanny

Dari: rchildbalance Kepada: mb12valtrex Dikirim: Jumat, 11 November 2011 13:19Judul: Re: yipppeeeeee!!! (e-mail from WA mom on surfactants)

Immusist is not an MLM....I don't know where that came from...far from it...to keep the costs down they have not even built in any $'s for the docs to mark it up for profit so most are not even carrying it their offices....they're just referring to their web-site...he told me they've done what they can removing all middle-man costs just to get the price as low as possible, surfactants in general are just expensive to manufacturer. The doc in our group told us that newborn rx surfactants are thousands...The only MLM product I mentioned through the interchanges was in answering someones ? on binders I did end up posting about 1 product that our group uses as a binder that is an MLM, the Shaklee Alfalfa....as a group we order this together, I make no money off of it & all discount distributer prices are passed to the group to benefit all. The product itself is the reason we use it as it's the only Alfalfa product that we can find that has a

nice spearmint flavor that many of our kids like. The group gets the distributer cost + we split the shipping, I personally make no money off of it. The 700 bottle capsule ends up running each person around $28...no complaints from the group, they are just greatful for the lower cost product that works.I've supported products for years on this list without gain....Cheryl, you know I did not even accept credit for the LDM-100 explanation that I approved on the blog...I've continued to maintain that if it helps a child then it was worth the effort...I'm passing forward with a greatful heart all the things I've learned on the group. In this season of recognising Thankfulness, Thank You Cheryl For All You Do, your efforts in so much are always so appreciated.Blessings,Rita>> I don't have a horse in this race. Here's my opinion: do what works. It's really that simple. I don't care what the ingredients are if it works. Would I prefer it be better? Absolutely. Would I argue over the food coloring? Only if I *knew* my kid would spin out on it. My son doesn't so if I were inclined to try it, I would.> > It's not a lifelong commitment. There's nothing that says a person can't stop. But I would be willing to try it if I saw others getting results. > > That's why I'm trying humaworm and not alinia. That's why I'm trying a *gasp* MLM product called Reliv (and before I get any questions, I have to put my son on a nutritional shake since the ritalin makes him sooooo not hungry and since I have to buy one anyway, I'm starting with something I know other people are having big successes with. No matter what, he still need the nutrition so

whether he gets any gains in either the autism [meaning I'd really like to not have to give him antivirals/antifungaals anymore] or the adhd department is really moot - but would be a welcome bonus.)> > Don't get me wrong, I understand where you all are coming from. I understand the dyes are big no-no for most of us and we generally avoid them like the plague if we can. But we can't always do so. I guarantee you that your children are getting things you really wish they weren't. This seems like such an insignificant thing to be so argumentative over (again, I DO get where you're coming from, I guess I'm just saying that I don't see why it can't be left at "oh there's dye in it. I can't/won't do it.") I don't do *a lot* of things that many people on this list do for various reasons. I don't feel the need to string everyone up for it or challenge them. I only get moderator-pissy when there's an attitude problem (which I don't see here so

don't think I'm suggesting that, either). I'm only saying this because I don't want to start a big ta-doo when I say, I don't understand why it's turned into such a sticking point. It's not like the ingredients list is overwhelmingly bad. There are plenty of things in Kirkman's (and others) products that I can easily say that's no bueno.> > > Are ingredients important? Yes. Especially if you have a sensitive child and you know their sensitivities. But once again, I find myself wanting to say DO WHAT WORKS. If what works for your kid is Lake Blue number 5 and you can't find anything else, why on earth wouldn't you do it? It's an extreme and unlikely example but you get my meaning. > > I feel like this product is suffering from its MLM association and that's why this response is happening (which is also kinda understandable). Maybe I'm wrong. There have been many MLM products that have promised x, y, & z and never

delivered so I get that bit of stigma. I immediately shut down when I hear about MLM products, too. I just find this to be a bit of an awkward situation. We all share stories about what works for us. Hers happens to be Immusist. It's not overt MLM marketing directly to you through her sales account - the website she sends you to is the general website so I don't see any attempt to directly sell on this list. She hasn't tried to disguise it as something else, which happens often. It's the only thing I can figure, though, on why people's feathers are all a-ruffled.> > Keep your heads. Common sense is king in a world of chaos. Do what works for your kid. I'd be willing to try it based on the reports but $88 a bottle is a bit steep, especially when considering one bottle doesn't seem to last that long. It's a steep price for what amounts to an experiment and I don't have money to experiment with at the moment. > > > ~

Antiviral Therapy 101> > ~ gryffinstail.wordpress.com/ ~> ~ @Gryffins_Tail ~>