Guest guest Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 Hi All, I know the group has discussed this issue to death, so I tried to do a search of past posts, but found too many emails that included the word " insurance " . Sorry, but here's my question: I've been told that with PSC you need to always have health insurance - no brainer, but if one were to change jobs and forfit their health insurance, isn't it always a option to just go on your spouse's insurance if that's an option? And then if you (the PSCer) changed jobs again, wouldn't a new employer's heath insurance cover you? This is how it's always been with my wife and me - before I got PSC. I assume it will continue like this and that the pre-existing condition clause is normally limited to when you try to buy a policy. We've checked with my wife's plan and there isn't a problem like this for me now. I only ask because it seems like people recommend greatly against changing jobs if you loose your insurance. Thanks, Washington, DC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 , Many insurances will not cover pre existing diseases. When I was first diagnosed with PSC I was only with my current employer for a year. The insurance company wanted to know who my doctor was to check to see if I was previously diagnosed. I wasn't so I was okay. But you would need to check to if the new insurance company would cover you. PSC 1989, TX1 97 tx2 04 And then if you (the PSCer) > changed jobs again, wouldn't a new employer's heath insurance cover > you? > > Thanks, > > > Washington, DC > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 Under HIPAA (passed ~1992), insurance companies are not allowed to deny you coverage for pre-existing conditions as long as you've maintained a qualifying insurance plan - in other words they can only deny you based on pre-existing condition if you have one of the dreaded insurance " gaps. " I know this and the various methods for avoiding it (spouse's insurance, COBRA, etc.) have definitely been discussed on this site before, I would search the posts for " pre- existing " to find the detailed answers. tx, Nina in Philly , > Many insurances will not cover pre existing diseases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 , I'd like to know more about ths insurance issue and PSC. I don't understand, if you have a pre-existing condition, then it seems to me if you change jobs and that requires you to also change your insurance company, couldn't you simply pay a higher premimium but still be insured? It seems absurd that one cannot change insurance companies or policies. I'd appreciate hearing from the group on their experiences and this issue as it is a very touchy one anywhere, but especially in the States. Ellen > Many insurances will not cover pre existing diseases. When I was > first diagnosed with PSC I was only with my current employer for a > year. The insurance company wanted to know who my doctor was to check > to see if I was previously diagnosed. I wasn't so I was okay. But you > would need to check to if the new insurance company would cover you.> > PSC 1989, TX1 97 tx2 04> > And then if you (the PSCer) > > changed jobs again, wouldn't a new employer's heath insurance cover > > you? > > > Thanks,> > > > > > Washington, DC> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 It all depends on the insurance company, and what the results of the contract negotiation with the employer were. There are also laws in some states that limit what can and cannot be done (Minnesota is considered to be quite liberal - there are many laws on insurance). Usually, the employer's benefit package includes a contract with a specific insurance company (or maybe a few selections). That contract is only with the employer and typically cannot be transferred. In my case, when I started with this company 30 years ago, I wasn’t' aware of pre-existing condition limitations (I had just been diagnosed with UC). The only question I got was from the company nurse, who asked how I was doing. I doubt if I'd get the same treatment now. Most companies these days are not " one big family " any more and are driven by competition. When I retire, I will be required to change insurance, but I cannot be refused insurance. It will be much more expensive. 20 years ago, insurance was part of your retirement benefits. That is not the case any more, at least for us. Arne 56 - UC 1977, PSC 2000 Alive and (mostly) well in Minnesota ________________________________ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of e_boermeester , I'd like to know more about ths insurance issue and PSC. I don't understand, if you have a pre-existing condition, then it seems to me if you change jobs and that requires you to also change your insurance company, couldn't you simply pay a higher premimium but still be insured? It seems absurd that one cannot change insurance companies or policies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 Here's a pretty good summary of HIPAA law. It does not include the recently added privacy provisions and is written as a guideline for employer compliance. Sorry its long. Darcy HIPAA: THE NEW HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM LAW'S EFFECT ON EMPLOYER GROUP HEALTH PLANS By Berg Brigham On Aug. 21, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA"). While the reforms included in this new law are not on the broad scale President Clinton favored early in his administration, the changes are significant and compliance requires, among other things, tracking of employees’ and dependents’ coverage periods and benefits; review of existing health plans for any required changes; notification of COBRA qualified beneficiaries regarding changes; revision of benefits communications; and preparation of new forms. This article examines the rationale and provisions of HIPAA as they affect employer group health plans. It also references key provisions and includes model forms from the interim final regulations issued by the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and Health and Human Services in April 1997. The central elements of HIPAA are its portability provisions. These reforms are designed to help employees who change or lose jobs to maintain health coverage by requiring subsequent employers to accept them into health plans. To achieve this the law: • prohibits group health plans from establishing eligibility rules based on health status; • limits the duration and extent to which group health plans may exclude preexisting conditions; • requires group health plans to track and provide certification of an individual’s coverage when the individual leaves the plan so that he or she may gain access to another plan with reduced or no preexisting condition limitations; • requires special enrollment periods for individuals losing other coverage under certain circumstances; • clarifies and extends COBRA; and • expands ERISA’s disclosure requirements. In addition, the health insurance reform law includes provisions specifically aimed at helping small businesses and self-employed individuals obtain and retain health coverage. These provisions include guaranteed availability of coverage for small groups; guaranteed renewability of existing coverage; tax-favored medical savings accounts to cover out-of-pocket expenses in conjunction with high-deductible insurance; and increased tax deductibility for health premiums paid by self-employed individuals. Limits on Health-Related Exclusions While the new health insurance reform law does not dictate specific benefits or levels of coverage, it forbids exclusions based upon health status and limits the imposition of preexisting condition exclusions. Group health plans may not exclude employees or dependents (if otherwise covered under the plan) based on health status, medical condition (physical or mental), claims experience, receipt of health care, medical history, genetic information, evidence of insurability (including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence), or disability. Moreover, HIPAA prohibits plans from requiring higher premium contributions based on an individual’s or dependent’s health status. The new law does not, however, preclude premium discounts or rebates in connection with bona fide health promotion and wellness programs. The interim regulations do not provide much guidance in this area and leave open the issue whether discounts to non-smokers would be permitted. Preexisting condition limitations are closely circumscribed by HIPAA. A health plan may impose a preexisting condition exclusion only if it relates to a condition for which care was recommended or received within the six months preceding enrollment in the plan and applies for no more than 12 months (18 months in the case of a late enrollee). The duration of any exclusion is further reduced by the length of "creditable coverage" the employee had previously (i.e., health coverage with no break longer than 63 days, excluding the plan’s own waiting period). Certain conditions and beneficiaries may not be subject to preexisting condition exclusions. Under no circumstances may pregnancy be treated as a preexisting condition. In addition, no preexisting condition exclusions may be applied to newborns or adopted children who have any creditable coverage within the first thirty days following birth or adoption. And absent a diagnosis of a related condition, genetic information may not be treated as a preexisting condition. Employers must inform all group health plan participants of the existence and terms of any preexisting condition exclusions in writing and also must advise them that the exclusion period may be reduced by their creditable coverage. When imposing a preexisting condition exclusion, the plan must notify the participant. This notice must include the source and substance of any information upon which the plan relied in making its determination, as well as the plan’s appeals procedures. A determination that an individual has a preexisting condition generally would be made through medical records (e.g., diagnosis codes on bills, physicians’ notes, prescription records) during the six-month "look-back" period before enrollment. In making such a determination, a plan may not use the "prudent person" standard followed in some states whereby a condition may be taken into account if a prudent person would have sought care, regardless of whether any care was received. Moreover, a plan may not exclude coverage for any condition identified during a physical examination conducted during the waiting period (after employment begins and before enrollment) unless treatment of the condition was recommended or received during the six-month look-back period. Any waiting period imposed by the plan must run concurrently with the preexisting condition exclusion period and does not count as a break in coverage. But the days in a waiting period do not count as "creditable coverage" either. Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) may use "affiliation periods" of two months (three months for late enrollees) in lieu of preexisting condition exclusions. The affiliation period begins with enrollment in the plan and may not be repeated if the employer changes plans. Certification of Coverage Beginning June 1, 1997, group health plans must automatically issue "certificates of coverage" to employees and dependents when they are no longer covered by the plan or after their COBRA coverage ceases. These automatic certificates need only reflect the most recent period of continuous coverage. In addition, group health plans must provide these certificates at an individual’s request for up to 24 months after coverage under the plan or COBRA ends. Such requested certificates should indicate all periods of continuous coverage ending within the 24 months prior to the date of the request. Fortunately, the interim regulations include a model "Certificate of Group Health Plan Coverage" that is fairly user friendly. If an individual has at least 18 months of creditable coverage, the plan administrator need only indicate that fact, as well as the date coverage ended (or that it is continuing) on the certificate. Otherwise, the certificate must also include the date any waiting or affiliation period began and the date coverage began. Separate certificates must be provided for the plan participant and each beneficiary if the information is not identical for these individuals. This may be difficult for employers whose data systems are not set up to track dependent coverage. In recognition of this problem, the interim regulations include the following transition rule: through June 30, 1998, a plan may satisfy its certification obligation regarding a dependent by providing the name of the covered plan participant and specifying the type of coverage provided (e.g., family coverage, employee-plus-spouse coverage). But if requested to provide a certificate for a dependent, the plan must make reasonable efforts to obtain and provide the name of the dependent. After June 30, 1998, plans will have to make reasonable efforts to collect dependent information and include it on the certificate. An automatic certificate based upon a dependent’s loss of coverage is not required until the plan knows or, making reasonable efforts, should know of the loss of coverage. The interim regulations suggest that this information be collected annually during open enrollment. Individuals who are entitled to an automatic certificate because of loss of coverage must be provided with the certificate within the same time frame as notice of a qualifying event under COBRA. Where the certificate is provided upon the request of an individual within 24 months of the loss of coverage, the certificate must be provided at the earliest time that the plan, acting in a reasonable and prompt fashion, can do so. Plans and insurers or third party administrators may decide among themselves which party will be responsible for providing the certificates of coverage and other notices required by HIPAA. Such agreements should be put into writing. The certificate may be mailed to the participant’s last known address. In addition, coverage information may be provided by telephone if all parties agree. If a participant entering a plan has not received a certificate of coverage from his or her previous plan, the new plan must consider whatever other documentation the participant can provide (e.g., pay stubs reflecting deductions for health insurance, explanation of benefits forms) in determining the participant’s creditable coverage. Although a group health plan need not issue the certifications before June 1, 1997, the tracking of coverage must include all periods of coverage from July 1, 1996, forward. For the period between July 1, 1996 and Oct. 1, 1996, a plan will be required to provide certification only upon an individual’s written request. For the period between October 1, 1996, and May 31, 1997, the interim regulations provide a transition rule whereby employers may issue special notices to plan participants losing coverage during that time in lieu of providing certificates of coverage. This will be particularly helpful for employers with a large number of employees who lost coverage during that period, because the actual coverage periods will have to be determined only for participants requesting certificates. The interim regulations include a Model Notice for this purpose. Crediting Coverage For New Entrants Into Plan The corollary to the certification of coverage by the prior plan is the crediting of coverage by the "new" plan against any preexisting condition exclusion imposed under the plan. The prior coverage may include another group health plan, health insurance coverage, Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, state risk pools, or the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan. A period of coverage need not be credited if there was a gap of 63 days or more between that period of coverage and the individual’s enrollment in the group health plan. In crediting the prior coverage, any preexisting condition exclusion applied under the plan generally must be offset by all days of a new entrant’s creditable coverage, regardless of the specific benefits provided in the period of creditable coverage. Alternatively, an employer may elect to credit coverage separately with respect to five specific categories of coverage: mental health, substance abuse treatment, prescription drugs, dental care, and vision care. This election must be made on a uniform basis for all participants and beneficiaries. The plan may use this alternative method for any or all of these categories of coverage and may apply a different preexisting condition exclusion period with respect to each category. The standard "day-for-day" method still must be used to determine an individual’s creditable coverage for benefits not within any category for which the alternative method is used. The plan’s disclosure statements, including plan information provided at the time of enrollment, must prominently indicate that the alternative method is being used and describe the effect of using the alternative method (i.e., that certain benefits may be subject to preexisting condition exclusions if not included in the prior coverage). Because some plans will adopt this alternative method for crediting prior coverage, group health plans will also be required to disclose to other plans information regarding the five categories of health benefits so that the subsequent group health plan or insurer may evaluate it for purposes of crediting the coverage. A plan may charge the reasonable cost of disclosing such information. Certain benefits, including separate vision or dental policies, disease-specific coverage, and Medicare supplemental coverage, are excluded from HIPAA’s portability provisions. Special Enrollment Periods Group health plans must allow special enrollment periods for employees and dependents who previously declined coverage under the plan because of other coverage. This 30-day enrollment period applies only if the employee and/or dependent lost coverage because of exhaustion of COBRA benefits, for "COBRA-like" reasons (i.e., separation, divorce, death, termination of employment, reduction of hours), or if the employer contributions to the other coverage were terminated. Plans that cover dependents must also provide a 30-day enrollment period for individuals who become dependents by marriage, birth, adoption, or placement for adoption. An employee’s spouse may also enroll as a dependent under the employee’s coverage at the time of birth or adoption of a child. A special enrollee is not treated as a late enrollee, and thus the maximum applicable preexisting condition limitation period is 12 months less any creditable coverage. Pursuant to the interim regulations, plans must provide a description of these special enrollment rights to anyone declining coverage. The regulations include a Model Description. . Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 Thanks for this great information! Berry Washignton, DC > > Here's a pretty good summary of HIPAA law. It does not include the recently added privacy provisions and is written as a guideline for employer compliance. Sorry its long. > > Darcy > > > HIPAA: THE NEW HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM LAW'S EFFECT ON EMPLOYER GROUP HEALTH PLANS > By Berg Brigham > > > On Aug. 21, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ( " HIPAA " ). While the reforms included in this new law are not on the broad scale President Clinton favored early in his administration, the changes are significant and compliance requires, among other things, tracking of employees' and dependents' coverage periods and benefits; review of existing health plans for any required changes; notification of COBRA qualified beneficiaries regarding changes; revision of benefits communications; and preparation of new forms. This article examines the rationale and provisions of HIPAA as they affect employer group health plans. It also references key provisions and includes model forms from the interim final regulations issued by the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and Health and Human Services in April 1997. > The central elements of HIPAA are its portability provisions. These reforms are designed to help employees who change or lose jobs to maintain health coverage by requiring subsequent employers to accept them into health plans. To achieve this the law: > • prohibits group health plans from establishing eligibility rules based on health status; > • limits the duration and extent to which group health plans may exclude preexisting conditions; > • requires group health plans to track and provide certification of an individual's coverage when the individual leaves the plan so that he or she may gain access to another plan with reduced or no preexisting condition limitations; > • requires special enrollment periods for individuals losing other coverage under certain circumstances; > • clarifies and extends COBRA; and > • expands ERISA's disclosure requirements. > > In addition, the health insurance reform law includes provisions specifically aimed at helping small businesses and self-employed individuals obtain and retain health coverage. These provisions include guaranteed availability of coverage for small groups; guaranteed renewability of existing coverage; tax-favored medical savings accounts to cover out-of-pocket expenses in conjunction with high-deductible insurance; and increased tax deductibility for health premiums paid by self-employed individuals. > Limits on Health-Related Exclusions > While the new health insurance reform law does not dictate specific benefits or levels of coverage, it forbids exclusions based upon health status and limits the imposition of preexisting condition exclusions. Group health plans may not exclude employees or dependents (if otherwise covered under the plan) based on health status, medical condition (physical or mental), claims experience, receipt of health care, medical history, genetic information, evidence of insurability (including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence), or disability. Moreover, HIPAA prohibits plans from requiring higher premium contributions based on an individual's or dependent's health status. The new law does not, however, preclude premium discounts or rebates in connection with bona fide health promotion and wellness programs. The interim regulations do not provide much guidance in this area and leave open the issue whether discounts to non-smokers would be permitted. > Preexisting condition limitations are closely circumscribed by HIPAA. A health plan may impose a preexisting condition exclusion only if it relates to a condition for which care was recommended or received within the six months preceding enrollment in the plan and applies for no more than 12 months (18 months in the case of a late enrollee). The duration of any exclusion is further reduced by the length of " creditable coverage " the employee had previously (i.e., health coverage with no break longer than 63 days, excluding the plan's own waiting period). > Certain conditions and beneficiaries may not be subject to preexisting condition exclusions. Under no circumstances may pregnancy be treated as a preexisting condition. In addition, no preexisting condition exclusions may be applied to newborns or adopted children who have any creditable coverage within the first thirty days following birth or adoption. And absent a diagnosis of a related condition, genetic information may not be treated as a preexisting condition. > Employers must inform all group health plan participants of the existence and terms of any preexisting condition exclusions in writing and also must advise them that the exclusion period may be reduced by their creditable coverage. When imposing a preexisting condition exclusion, the plan must notify the participant. This notice must include the source and substance of any information upon which the plan relied in making its determination, as well as the plan's appeals procedures. > A determination that an individual has a preexisting condition generally would be made through medical records (e.g., diagnosis codes on bills, physicians' notes, prescription records) during the six-month " look-back " period before enrollment. In making such a determination, a plan may not use the " prudent person " standard followed in some states whereby a condition may be taken into account if a prudent person would have sought care, regardless of whether any care was received. Moreover, a plan may not exclude coverage for any condition identified during a physical examination conducted during the waiting period (after employment begins and before enrollment) unless treatment of the condition was recommended or received during the six-month look-back period. > Any waiting period imposed by the plan must run concurrently with the preexisting condition exclusion period and does not count as a break in coverage. But the days in a waiting period do not count as " creditable coverage " either. Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) may use " affiliation periods " of two months (three months for late enrollees) in lieu of preexisting condition exclusions. The affiliation period begins with enrollment in the plan and may not be repeated if the employer changes plans. > Certification of Coverage > Beginning June 1, 1997, group health plans must automatically issue " certificates of coverage " to employees and dependents when they are no longer covered by the plan or after their COBRA coverage ceases. These automatic certificates need only reflect the most recent period of continuous coverage. In addition, group health plans must provide these certificates at an individual's request for up to 24 months after coverage under the plan or COBRA ends. Such requested certificates should indicate all periods of continuous coverage ending within the 24 months prior to the date of the request. > Fortunately, the interim regulations include a model " Certificate of Group Health Plan Coverage " that is fairly user friendly. If an individual has at least 18 months of creditable coverage, the plan administrator need only indicate that fact, as well as the date coverage ended (or that it is continuing) on the certificate. Otherwise, the certificate must also include the date any waiting or affiliation period began and the date coverage began. > Separate certificates must be provided for the plan participant and each beneficiary if the information is not identical for these individuals. This may be difficult for employers whose data systems are not set up to track dependent coverage. In recognition of this problem, the interim regulations include the following transition rule: through June 30, 1998, a plan may satisfy its certification obligation regarding a dependent by providing the name of the covered plan participant and specifying the type of coverage provided (e.g., family coverage, employee-plus-spouse coverage). But if requested to provide a certificate for a dependent, the plan must make reasonable efforts to obtain and provide the name of the dependent. After June 30, 1998, plans will have to make reasonable efforts to collect dependent information and include it on the certificate. An automatic certificate based upon a dependent's loss of coverage is not required until the plan knows or, making > reasonable efforts, should know of the loss of coverage. The interim regulations suggest that this information be collected annually during open enrollment. > Individuals who are entitled to an automatic certificate because of loss of coverage must be provided with the certificate within the same time frame as notice of a qualifying event under COBRA. Where the certificate is provided upon the request of an individual within 24 months of the loss of coverage, the certificate must be provided at the earliest time that the plan, acting in a reasonable and prompt fashion, can do so. Plans and insurers or third party administrators may decide among themselves which party will be responsible for providing the certificates of coverage and other notices required by HIPAA. Such agreements should be put into writing. > The certificate may be mailed to the participant's last known address. In addition, coverage information may be provided by telephone if all parties agree. If a participant entering a plan has not received a certificate of coverage from his or her previous plan, the new plan must consider whatever other documentation the participant can provide (e.g., pay stubs reflecting deductions for health insurance, explanation of benefits forms) in determining the participant's creditable coverage. > Although a group health plan need not issue the certifications before June 1, 1997, the tracking of coverage must include all periods of coverage from July 1, 1996, forward. For the period between July 1, 1996 and Oct. 1, 1996, a plan will be required to provide certification only upon an individual's written request. For the period between October 1, 1996, and May 31, 1997, the interim regulations provide a transition rule whereby employers may issue special notices to plan participants losing coverage during that time in lieu of providing certificates of coverage. This will be particularly helpful for employers with a large number of employees who lost coverage during that period, because the actual coverage periods will have to be determined only for participants requesting certificates. The interim regulations include a Model Notice for this purpose. > Crediting Coverage For New Entrants Into Plan > The corollary to the certification of coverage by the prior plan is the crediting of coverage by the " new " plan against any preexisting condition exclusion imposed under the plan. The prior coverage may include another group health plan, health insurance coverage, Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, state risk pools, or the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan. A period of coverage need not be credited if there was a gap of 63 days or more between that period of coverage and the individual's enrollment in the group health plan. > In crediting the prior coverage, any preexisting condition exclusion applied under the plan generally must be offset by all days of a new entrant's creditable coverage, regardless of the specific benefits provided in the period of creditable coverage. Alternatively, an employer may elect to credit coverage separately with respect to five specific categories of coverage: mental health, substance abuse treatment, prescription drugs, dental care, and vision care. This election must be made on a uniform basis for all participants and beneficiaries. The plan may use this alternative method for any or all of these categories of coverage and may apply a different preexisting condition exclusion period with respect to each category. The standard " day-for-day " method still must be used to determine an individual's creditable coverage for benefits not within any category for which the alternative method is used. The plan's disclosure statements, including plan information provided > at the time of enrollment, must prominently indicate that the alternative method is being used and describe the effect of using the alternative method (i.e., that certain benefits may be subject to preexisting condition exclusions if not included in the prior coverage). > Because some plans will adopt this alternative method for crediting prior coverage, group health plans will also be required to disclose to other plans information regarding the five categories of health benefits so that the subsequent group health plan or insurer may evaluate it for purposes of crediting the coverage. A plan may charge the reasonable cost of disclosing such information. > Certain benefits, including separate vision or dental policies, disease-specific coverage, and Medicare supplemental coverage, are excluded from HIPAA's portability provisions. > Special Enrollment Periods > Group health plans must allow special enrollment periods for employees and dependents who previously declined coverage under the plan because of other coverage. This 30-day enrollment period applies only if the employee and/or dependent lost coverage because of exhaustion of COBRA benefits, for " COBRA-like " reasons (i.e., separation, divorce, death, termination of employment, reduction of hours), or if the employer contributions to the other coverage were terminated. Plans that cover dependents must also provide a 30-day enrollment period for individuals who become dependents by marriage, birth, adoption, or placement for adoption. An employee's spouse may also enroll as a dependent under the employee's coverage at the time of birth or adoption of a child. A special enrollee is not treated as a late enrollee, and thus the maximum applicable preexisting condition limitation period is 12 months less any creditable coverage. Pursuant to the interim regulations, plans must > provide a description of these special enrollment rights to anyone declining coverage. The regulations include a Model Description. > > > . > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Got a little couch potato? > Check out fun summer activities for kids. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 Thanks for this great information! Berry Washignton, DC > > Here's a pretty good summary of HIPAA law. It does not include the recently added privacy provisions and is written as a guideline for employer compliance. Sorry its long. > > Darcy > > > HIPAA: THE NEW HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM LAW'S EFFECT ON EMPLOYER GROUP HEALTH PLANS > By Berg Brigham > > > On Aug. 21, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ( " HIPAA " ). While the reforms included in this new law are not on the broad scale President Clinton favored early in his administration, the changes are significant and compliance requires, among other things, tracking of employees' and dependents' coverage periods and benefits; review of existing health plans for any required changes; notification of COBRA qualified beneficiaries regarding changes; revision of benefits communications; and preparation of new forms. This article examines the rationale and provisions of HIPAA as they affect employer group health plans. It also references key provisions and includes model forms from the interim final regulations issued by the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and Health and Human Services in April 1997. > The central elements of HIPAA are its portability provisions. These reforms are designed to help employees who change or lose jobs to maintain health coverage by requiring subsequent employers to accept them into health plans. To achieve this the law: > • prohibits group health plans from establishing eligibility rules based on health status; > • limits the duration and extent to which group health plans may exclude preexisting conditions; > • requires group health plans to track and provide certification of an individual's coverage when the individual leaves the plan so that he or she may gain access to another plan with reduced or no preexisting condition limitations; > • requires special enrollment periods for individuals losing other coverage under certain circumstances; > • clarifies and extends COBRA; and > • expands ERISA's disclosure requirements. > > In addition, the health insurance reform law includes provisions specifically aimed at helping small businesses and self-employed individuals obtain and retain health coverage. These provisions include guaranteed availability of coverage for small groups; guaranteed renewability of existing coverage; tax-favored medical savings accounts to cover out-of-pocket expenses in conjunction with high-deductible insurance; and increased tax deductibility for health premiums paid by self-employed individuals. > Limits on Health-Related Exclusions > While the new health insurance reform law does not dictate specific benefits or levels of coverage, it forbids exclusions based upon health status and limits the imposition of preexisting condition exclusions. Group health plans may not exclude employees or dependents (if otherwise covered under the plan) based on health status, medical condition (physical or mental), claims experience, receipt of health care, medical history, genetic information, evidence of insurability (including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence), or disability. Moreover, HIPAA prohibits plans from requiring higher premium contributions based on an individual's or dependent's health status. The new law does not, however, preclude premium discounts or rebates in connection with bona fide health promotion and wellness programs. The interim regulations do not provide much guidance in this area and leave open the issue whether discounts to non-smokers would be permitted. > Preexisting condition limitations are closely circumscribed by HIPAA. A health plan may impose a preexisting condition exclusion only if it relates to a condition for which care was recommended or received within the six months preceding enrollment in the plan and applies for no more than 12 months (18 months in the case of a late enrollee). The duration of any exclusion is further reduced by the length of " creditable coverage " the employee had previously (i.e., health coverage with no break longer than 63 days, excluding the plan's own waiting period). > Certain conditions and beneficiaries may not be subject to preexisting condition exclusions. Under no circumstances may pregnancy be treated as a preexisting condition. In addition, no preexisting condition exclusions may be applied to newborns or adopted children who have any creditable coverage within the first thirty days following birth or adoption. And absent a diagnosis of a related condition, genetic information may not be treated as a preexisting condition. > Employers must inform all group health plan participants of the existence and terms of any preexisting condition exclusions in writing and also must advise them that the exclusion period may be reduced by their creditable coverage. When imposing a preexisting condition exclusion, the plan must notify the participant. This notice must include the source and substance of any information upon which the plan relied in making its determination, as well as the plan's appeals procedures. > A determination that an individual has a preexisting condition generally would be made through medical records (e.g., diagnosis codes on bills, physicians' notes, prescription records) during the six-month " look-back " period before enrollment. In making such a determination, a plan may not use the " prudent person " standard followed in some states whereby a condition may be taken into account if a prudent person would have sought care, regardless of whether any care was received. Moreover, a plan may not exclude coverage for any condition identified during a physical examination conducted during the waiting period (after employment begins and before enrollment) unless treatment of the condition was recommended or received during the six-month look-back period. > Any waiting period imposed by the plan must run concurrently with the preexisting condition exclusion period and does not count as a break in coverage. But the days in a waiting period do not count as " creditable coverage " either. Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) may use " affiliation periods " of two months (three months for late enrollees) in lieu of preexisting condition exclusions. The affiliation period begins with enrollment in the plan and may not be repeated if the employer changes plans. > Certification of Coverage > Beginning June 1, 1997, group health plans must automatically issue " certificates of coverage " to employees and dependents when they are no longer covered by the plan or after their COBRA coverage ceases. These automatic certificates need only reflect the most recent period of continuous coverage. In addition, group health plans must provide these certificates at an individual's request for up to 24 months after coverage under the plan or COBRA ends. Such requested certificates should indicate all periods of continuous coverage ending within the 24 months prior to the date of the request. > Fortunately, the interim regulations include a model " Certificate of Group Health Plan Coverage " that is fairly user friendly. If an individual has at least 18 months of creditable coverage, the plan administrator need only indicate that fact, as well as the date coverage ended (or that it is continuing) on the certificate. Otherwise, the certificate must also include the date any waiting or affiliation period began and the date coverage began. > Separate certificates must be provided for the plan participant and each beneficiary if the information is not identical for these individuals. This may be difficult for employers whose data systems are not set up to track dependent coverage. In recognition of this problem, the interim regulations include the following transition rule: through June 30, 1998, a plan may satisfy its certification obligation regarding a dependent by providing the name of the covered plan participant and specifying the type of coverage provided (e.g., family coverage, employee-plus-spouse coverage). But if requested to provide a certificate for a dependent, the plan must make reasonable efforts to obtain and provide the name of the dependent. After June 30, 1998, plans will have to make reasonable efforts to collect dependent information and include it on the certificate. An automatic certificate based upon a dependent's loss of coverage is not required until the plan knows or, making > reasonable efforts, should know of the loss of coverage. The interim regulations suggest that this information be collected annually during open enrollment. > Individuals who are entitled to an automatic certificate because of loss of coverage must be provided with the certificate within the same time frame as notice of a qualifying event under COBRA. Where the certificate is provided upon the request of an individual within 24 months of the loss of coverage, the certificate must be provided at the earliest time that the plan, acting in a reasonable and prompt fashion, can do so. Plans and insurers or third party administrators may decide among themselves which party will be responsible for providing the certificates of coverage and other notices required by HIPAA. Such agreements should be put into writing. > The certificate may be mailed to the participant's last known address. In addition, coverage information may be provided by telephone if all parties agree. If a participant entering a plan has not received a certificate of coverage from his or her previous plan, the new plan must consider whatever other documentation the participant can provide (e.g., pay stubs reflecting deductions for health insurance, explanation of benefits forms) in determining the participant's creditable coverage. > Although a group health plan need not issue the certifications before June 1, 1997, the tracking of coverage must include all periods of coverage from July 1, 1996, forward. For the period between July 1, 1996 and Oct. 1, 1996, a plan will be required to provide certification only upon an individual's written request. For the period between October 1, 1996, and May 31, 1997, the interim regulations provide a transition rule whereby employers may issue special notices to plan participants losing coverage during that time in lieu of providing certificates of coverage. This will be particularly helpful for employers with a large number of employees who lost coverage during that period, because the actual coverage periods will have to be determined only for participants requesting certificates. The interim regulations include a Model Notice for this purpose. > Crediting Coverage For New Entrants Into Plan > The corollary to the certification of coverage by the prior plan is the crediting of coverage by the " new " plan against any preexisting condition exclusion imposed under the plan. The prior coverage may include another group health plan, health insurance coverage, Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, state risk pools, or the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan. A period of coverage need not be credited if there was a gap of 63 days or more between that period of coverage and the individual's enrollment in the group health plan. > In crediting the prior coverage, any preexisting condition exclusion applied under the plan generally must be offset by all days of a new entrant's creditable coverage, regardless of the specific benefits provided in the period of creditable coverage. Alternatively, an employer may elect to credit coverage separately with respect to five specific categories of coverage: mental health, substance abuse treatment, prescription drugs, dental care, and vision care. This election must be made on a uniform basis for all participants and beneficiaries. The plan may use this alternative method for any or all of these categories of coverage and may apply a different preexisting condition exclusion period with respect to each category. The standard " day-for-day " method still must be used to determine an individual's creditable coverage for benefits not within any category for which the alternative method is used. The plan's disclosure statements, including plan information provided > at the time of enrollment, must prominently indicate that the alternative method is being used and describe the effect of using the alternative method (i.e., that certain benefits may be subject to preexisting condition exclusions if not included in the prior coverage). > Because some plans will adopt this alternative method for crediting prior coverage, group health plans will also be required to disclose to other plans information regarding the five categories of health benefits so that the subsequent group health plan or insurer may evaluate it for purposes of crediting the coverage. A plan may charge the reasonable cost of disclosing such information. > Certain benefits, including separate vision or dental policies, disease-specific coverage, and Medicare supplemental coverage, are excluded from HIPAA's portability provisions. > Special Enrollment Periods > Group health plans must allow special enrollment periods for employees and dependents who previously declined coverage under the plan because of other coverage. This 30-day enrollment period applies only if the employee and/or dependent lost coverage because of exhaustion of COBRA benefits, for " COBRA-like " reasons (i.e., separation, divorce, death, termination of employment, reduction of hours), or if the employer contributions to the other coverage were terminated. Plans that cover dependents must also provide a 30-day enrollment period for individuals who become dependents by marriage, birth, adoption, or placement for adoption. An employee's spouse may also enroll as a dependent under the employee's coverage at the time of birth or adoption of a child. A special enrollee is not treated as a late enrollee, and thus the maximum applicable preexisting condition limitation period is 12 months less any creditable coverage. Pursuant to the interim regulations, plans must > provide a description of these special enrollment rights to anyone declining coverage. The regulations include a Model Description. > > > . > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Got a little couch potato? > Check out fun summer activities for kids. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 From the day was diagnosed I have kept a notebook and have recorded everything that has been said to me and the names and contact information of everyone. Insurance companies do not like you to make waves and do not like bad PR so I found the best way was to speak with people as high up as possible and at one point threatened to go to the press. They laid down and asked what I wanted. Good luck. We recently had to get new insurance as I changed jobs as was very lucky in that they cover and they even accept his tx team. Martie_boermeester wrote: , I'd like to know more about ths insurance issue and PSC. I don't understand, if you have a pre-existing condition, then it seems to me if you change jobs and that requires you to also change your insurance company, couldn't you simply pay a higher premimium but still be insured? It seems absurd that one cannot change insurance companies or policies. I'd appreciate hearing from the group on their experiences and this issue as it is a very touchy one anywhere, but especially in the States. Ellen > Many insurances will not cover pre existing diseases. When I was > first diagnosed with PSC I was only with my current employer for a > year. The insurance company wanted to know who my doctor was to check > to see if I was previously diagnosed. I wasn't so I was okay. But you > would need to check to if the new insurance company would cover you.> > PSC 1989, TX1 97 tx2 04> > And then if you (the PSCer) > > changed jobs again, wouldn't a new employer's heath insurance cover > > you? > > > Thanks,> > > > > > Washington, DC> >> Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 I've had Kaiser insurance my whole adult life, and I'm 55 now. Even when I went to Japan, I kept the Kaiser insurance as an individual so that I'd be able to get health insurance when I came back (I was in Japan for a year). I haven't heard of a Kaiser dropping patients, but I have heard of Blue Cross dropping patients. In fact, there were recent stories in the paper of patients being dropped for high blood pressure. Can you imagine. I think that's pretty easily controlled. I'm fairly certain that the actual cost of my health care is fairly high. Although I had many years when things went pretty well. Overall I've been pretty happy with Kaiser. -Marie > >e_boermeester wrote: > , > I'd like to know more about ths insurance issue and PSC. I don't >understand, if you have a pre-existing condition, then it seems to me if >you change jobs and that requires you to also change your insurance >company, couldn't you simply pay a higher premimium but still be insured? > It seems absurd that one cannot change insurance companies or policies. > I'd appreciate hearing from the group on their experiences and this >issue as it is a very touchy one anywhere, but especially in the States. > Ellen > > > > Many insurances will not cover pre existing diseases. When I was > > first diagnosed with PSC I was only with my current employer for a > > year. The insurance company wanted to know who my doctor was to check > > to see if I was previously diagnosed. I wasn't so I was okay. But you > > would need to check to if the new insurance company would cover you. > > > > PSC 1989, TX1 97 tx2 04 > > > > And then if you (the PSCer) > > > changed jobs again, wouldn't a new employer's heath insurance cover > > > you? > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Washington, DC > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------- >Got a little couch potato? >Check out fun summer activities for kids. _________________________________________________________________ Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and more….then map the best route! http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2 & ss=yp.bars~yp.pizza~yp.movie%20theater & cp=\ 42.358996~-71.056691 & style=r & lvl=13 & tilt=-90 & dir=0 & alt=-1000 & scene=950607 & encTyp\ e=1 & FORM=MGAC01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.