Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Experts Say Birth Defect Risks Outweigh Benefits of SSRIs/Off Topic

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

September 5, 2007

Experts Say Birth Defect Risks Outweigh Benefits of SSRIs

By none

Experts Say Birth Defect Risks Outweigh Benefits of SSRIs

Drug makers looking to increase profits with the sale of selective

serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants to pregnant women claim

that untreated depression poses a grave risk to the unborn fetus, but

a new study reports that the use of antidepressants, and not the

depression itself, increases the risk of lower fetal age and preterm

birth.

The study in the August 2007 American Journal of Psychiatry examined

the effects of depression and antidepressant use on fetal age and

risk of preterm birth in 90 women who were divided into three groups:

(1) forty-nine women treated with antidepressants for more than 50%

of their pregnancy; (2) twenty-two briefly treated or not treated

with the drugs during pregnancy; and (3) a comparison group of 19

healthy pregnant women.

The researchers found that the average fetal age at birth was 38.5,

39.4 and 39.7 weeks in the three groups, respectively, and that the

rates of preterm birth were 14.3 percent, 0 percent and 5.3 percent,

respectively.

The study showed that the rate of admission to the special-care

nursery more than doubled at 21% for newborns exposed to

antidepressants, compared to 9% of infants born to mothers who were

not treated with the drugs and 0% in the control group. " This result

was surprising to us, as we had anticipated that depression and

anxiety during pregnancy would be associated with an increased risk

of preterm birth, " wrote Dr Rita Suri and colleagues from the

University of California, Los Angeles.

" The two groups of women with depression -- those who were treated

with antidepressants and those who were not -- had similar degrees of

depression and anxiety during pregnancy, " the authors of the study

note.

The new study is alarming because, in May 2005, researchers at the

University of Pittsburgh reported that, in any given year, at least

80,000 pregnant women in the US are prescribed SSRIs which include

Paxil marketed by GlaxoKline; Zoloft from Pfizer; Prozac and

Cymbalta marketed by Eli Lilly, and Celexa and Lexapro from Forest

Labs.

The drugs are still being prescribed to pregnant women despite the

fact that more than 4 years ago, in June 2004, the FDA revised the

SSRI labels to warn that infants exposed to the drugs in the womb can

develop problems requiring prolonged hospitalization, respiratory

support and tube feeding.

When issuing the warning, the agency said it had received hundreds of

preliminary reports of adverse effects in newborns over the last

decade and that the most common were trouble eating, irritability,

body rigidity and respiratory problems. More SSRI-related birth

defects have surfaced in every year since that FDA warning in 2004.

In September 2005, Glaxo sent a " Dear Doctor " letter about a Paxil

label change based on data from the National Birth Defects Prevention

Study, which found that women who took SSRIs were more likely to have

an infant with omphalocele, an abnormality in which the infant's

intestine or other abdominal organs protrude from the navel, with the

strongest effect reported with Paxil, accounting for 36% of all SSRI

exposures.

In addition, the " Dear Doctor " letter advised of an association

between mothers taking SSRI's and giving birth to an infant with

craniosynostosis, a congenital defect present at birth in which the

connections between sutures-skull bones prematurely close during the

first year of life, which causes an abnormally-shaped skull.

In December 2005, Glaxo notified doctors of a new warning added to

the Paxil label about the risk of major congenital malformations in

infants born to women taking Paxil during the first trimester of

pregnancy and the FDA also issued an advisory warning about the risk

of congenital malformations, especially of the heart, and changed

Paxil's category from C to D. Category D means a drug has been found

to harm the human fetus.

In July 2006, the FDA issued another public advisory, this time

warning that infants exposed to SSRI's were six times more likely to

develop the life-threatening lung disorder persistent pulmonary

hypertension (PPHN) than infants who were not exposed.

The warning was based on a study in the February 9, 2006, New England

Journal. After the study was released, lead author Dr

Chambers told the Wall Street Journal that she heard from women all

over the country who had babies born with PPHN after taking SSRI's

during pregnancy.

According to Dr Robin Steinhorn, Head, Division of Neonatology;

Children's Memorial Hospital of Chicago, Department of Pediatrics,

Professor, Northwestern University Medical School in eMedicine from

WebMD, accessed on August 15, 2007:

" Recent data suggest that the PPHN syndrome may occur as often as 2-6

cases per 1000 live births. PPHN is a frequent complicating factor in

the term or near-term newborn with parenchymal lung disease, such as

MAS (meconium aspiration syndrome) or pneumonia. An increased

incidence of PPHN is reported for mothers who use selective serotonin

reuptake inhibitors (SSRI's) during the last half of their

pregnancies. "

Dr Steinhorn explains that, during fetal life, pulmonary blood flow

is low, with less than 10% of the combined cardiac output directed to

the lungs. In fetal life, numerous factors, including hypoxia,

maintain high pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and after birth,

PVR decreases and pulmonary blood flow increases dramatically as the

lungs assume the function of gas exchange, he says.

However, in some newborns, Dr Steinborn notes, the normal decrease in

pulmonary vascular tone does not occur, and the result is PPHN. " This

syndrome causes substantial morbidity and mortality in otherwise

healthy, term newborns, " he states.

PPHN is the failure of the normal circulatory transition that occurs

after birth, and mechanical ventilation is usually needed to maintain

adequate oxygenation. Because of their lability and ability to fight

the ventilator, newborns with PPHN nearly always require sedation and

paralysis is sometimes required in newborns whose condition remains

unstable despite adequate sedation, Dr Steinborn says.

According to Baum, a pharmaceutical drug product liability

attorney and senior partner of Baum Hedlund law firm, who has been

handling SSRI cases for 17 years against defendants such as, Glaxo,

Pfizer and Eli Lilly in cases involving antidepressant-induced

suicide, birth defects and various other injuries, the increased risk

of lower fetal age and pre-term birth is likely linked to the

mechanism causing higher rates of fetal heart and lung defects

amongst babies whose mothers took SSRI's during pregnancy.

It is well known that SSRIs cross the placental barrier, he says,

leading to exposure of the developing fetus to the SSRI itself or

exposure to excess serotonin caused by the SSRI's during fetal organ

formation, which then leads to cellular and organic malformation.

" While the administration of the SSRI is supposedly intended

to " correct " a chemical imbalance in the depressed pregnant mother, "

Mr Baum explains, " its crossing the placental barrier may itself

cause a chemical imbalance for a developing fetus--the presence of

the SSRI may interfere with the proper balance of serotonin and

serotonin re-uptake needed for normal cellular development. "

" This link should have been analyzed and placed on SSRI warning

labels long before pregnant women were advised to take SSRIs--now

these children and their families are dealing with the tragic

aftermath that could have and should have been avoided, " he says.

Experts say the benefit of prescribing any drug must be weighed

against its risks. According to Harvard-trained psychiatrist Dr

Stefan Kruszewski, " This is never more important than when two lives

are at stake as with a pregnant mom and her unborn child. "

He notes that the serious risks for moms taking SSRI's may include an

inability to stop taking the drug, akathisia-induced suicidality and

rapid mood swings. " For the newborn, " he says, " the overwhelming

concern is the risk of major congenital malformations that can

require life-long medical care for the child. "

Dr Grace , a recognized authority on psychotropic drugs, also

warns that women often find they can never return to living without

the drugs – not because they develop a " craving, " she says, but

because the withdrawal effects they experience are intolerable and

are misinterpreted by physicians as " proof " of depressive relapse for

which " lifelong therapy " is mandated.

One of the world's best-known experts on SSRI's, Dr Breggin,

says, " the worst hazards of depression in pregnancy are those of

suicidality and, very rarely, infanticide. "

However, he points out that SSRI's are implicated in increasing the

risks of both suicide and violence and that the newest FDA labels

specifically warn about SSRI-induced suicidality in young adults, the

age group most likely to become pregnant. " Now we know, " he

says, " that the SSRI's not only threaten to cause the death of the

mother through suicide but also the death of the child through lethal

birth defects. "

The drug makers have known for years that SSRI's increase the risk of

suicide. Dr Arif Khan conducted an analysis of clinical trial data

for SSRI's approved by the FDA between 1985 and 2000 and reported a

finding of a higher rate of completed suicides during the trials, in

Clinical Psychiatric News, August 2002.

When compared to the rate of 11 per 100,000 suicides for the general

population, Dr Khan found there were 718 completed suicides per

100,000 in the clinical trials, and rates were higher among patients

receiving SSRI's than with patients taking a placebo. These findings

were particularly surprising, Dr Khan said, because most clinical

trials try to exclude patients who are actively suicidal.

On the benefits side of the equation, a review of 38 studies on

SSRI's including Zoloft, Prozac, Paxil, Serzone, Celexa and Effexor,

conducted during 1987-1999, showed an average 10-point improvement in

mood for patients who took the drugs, and an 8-point improvement in

patients on a placebo (Kirsch, , Scoboria & Nicholls, 2002).

Another leading expert on SSRI's, Dr Healy, author of, " The

Antidepressant Era, " says that the efficacy of SSRI's has been

greatly exaggerated, and a review of the actual clinical trials

reveal that only one in ten patients responds specifically to an SSRI

rather than a nonspecific factor or placebo.

Dr also notes that SSRI's barely out-performed sugar pills in

head-to-head trials. Dr Healy and Dr both say that the risks

of the neonatal withdrawal syndrome and serious birth defects far

outweigh any benefits of SSRI use by pregnant women.

Critics point out that, if SSRI's worked, suicide rates would be

declining, especially since patients are kept on the drugs

indefinitely. But suicide rates have not dropped at all, and in fact,

suicides have increased in some age groups.

The April 19, 2006, National Vital Statistic Report shows the overall

suicide rate in the US has remained basically unchanged since 1999

when the rate was 10.5 suicides per 100,000. In 2000, the rate was

10.4, and in 2001 it dipped to 10.1; but in 2002, the rate was back

up to 11.0. In 2003, the suicide rate was 10.8 per 100,000, and in

2004 it was back up to 11.0.

Going back to 1980, a year in the pre-SSRI era, in persons aged 25 to

44, death by suicide was ranked the 5th leading cause of death. In

2004, however, when SSRI's were close to being the most prescribed

class of drugs in the US, suicide rates were higher, and it became

the 4th leading cause of death for persons in this age group.

Yet the Centers for Disease Control recently reported that

antidepressants were the most prescribed drugs in the US in 2005,

with higher prescription rates than drugs used to treat high blood

pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes or headaches.

Experts say people are being misdiagnosed with depression as a result

of normal responses to stressful events or an important loss, or in

the case of pregnant women, worries that naturally occur with

becoming a new mother. According to Dr , author

of " America Fooled, " there is an abundance of research indicating

that depression can stem from many issues that are downplayed by drug-

industry-funded ads and literature.

" The fact that physicians rarely go over the many factors which we

know can move us away from joyfulness and toward depression, " he

says, " is a clear indication of the success of the industry's

marketing strategy. "

Dr says he is frustrated and angered by the industry's

essential disregard for the financial costs these ineffective drugs

impose on families and the physical harm they inflict on millions of

users who consume them year in and year out.

Families seeking legal advice regarding SSRI birth defects can

contact the Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Goldman & Menzies Law Firm at:

; http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/

Pringle

evelyn-pringle@...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...