Guest guest Posted May 12, 2002 Report Share Posted May 12, 2002 If I am not mistaken, various factors (X, etc.) mentioned by WAPF are destroyed by during pasteurization. If so, is pasteurized grass-fed butter any better than non-grass-fed one? Roman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2002 Report Share Posted May 12, 2002 From what I've read, the X factor is not destroyed by pasteurization. There is still X factor in pasteurized milk. I think I remember reading that although vitamins A & D are not totally destroyed in pasteurization, the amounts of each are compromised. I'd bet a lot CLA is still in pasteurized milk. There's some other factor, maybe it's the Wulzen, I'm not sure, that is destroyed completely in pasteurization. It's also called the Anti-stiffness factor I think, and it keeps you from getting stiff (calcified) joints. Compare to grain fed milk which (from what I've read) has no X factor, very low amounts of vitamin A & D, and very little CLA. > If I am not mistaken, various factors (X, etc.) mentioned by WAPF are > destroyed by during pasteurization. If so, is pasteurized grass-fed > butter any better than non-grass-fed one? > > Roman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.