Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

The Ischemic Preconditioning Paradox in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation-Evidence from a Prospective Randomized Single Blind Clinical Trial

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

The Ischemic Preconditioning Paradox in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation—Evidence from a Prospective Randomized Single Blind Clinical Trial

Authors: Koneru, B.; Shareef, A1; Dikdan, G.1; Desai, K.1; Klein, K. M.1; Peng, B.1; Wachsberg, R. H.1; de la Torre, A. N.1; Debroy, M.1; Fisher, A.1; , D. J.1; Samanta, A. K.1

Source: American Journal of Transplantation, Volume 7, Number 12, December 2007 , pp. 2788-2796(9)

Abstract:While animal studies show that ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is beneficial in liver transplantation (LT), evidence from few smaller clinical trials is conflicting. From October 2003 to July 2006, 101 deceased donors (DD) were randomized to 10 min IPC (n = 50) or No IPC (n = 51). Primary objective was efficacy of IPC to decrease reperfusion (RP) injury. Both groups had similar donor risk index (DRI) (1.54 vs. 1.57). Aminotransferases on days 1 and 2 were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in IPC recipients. In multivariate analyses, IPC had an independent effect only on day 2 aspartate transferase. Prothrombin time, bilirubin and histological injury were similar in both groups. IPC had no significant effect on plasma TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 in the donor and TNF-α and IL-6 in the recipient. In contrast, IPC recipients had a significant rise in systemic IL-10 levels after RP (p < 0.05) and had fewer moderate/severe rejections within 30 days (p = 0.09). Hospital stay was similar in both groups. One-year patient and graft survival in IPC versus No IPC were 88% versus 78% (p = 0.1) and 86 versus 76% (p = 0.25), respectively. IPC increases RP injury after DDLT, an `IPC paradox'. Other potential benefits of IPC are limited. IPC may be more effective in combination with other preconditioning regimens.

Keywords: Deceased donor; ischemia/reperfusion injury; ischemic preconditioning; liver transplantation

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02009.x

Affiliations: 1: Departments of Surgery, Pathology, Biostatistics and Radiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...