Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 This is very interesting to me also, though I am a little late in getting in on this, as I was dealing with the flu the past two weeks (in spite of having a flu shot this year). I typically run about 97.4 F when I am feeling well. I notice that many times I don't feel well with a temp reading of just over 99F, though they never have me come to ER unless my temp is over 101.5F. However, whenever I get a fever over 100F, it almost always continues to rise til it gets around 103F. I have been told that people who are immune suppressed (usually post transplant) often don't show fevers the same way as others would, even given an infection. So sometimes I wonder if I am getting more seriously infected in order to get to 103F than other people at that temp. Can anyone explain whether a fever is relative to what your 'normal' temp is, relative to an absolute temp number, or is it some mix of those two??? If a fever is relative to your personal normal, why don't they do more to take this into consideration in ER or the hospital? Is it because when people get badly infected their temps all go up to 102.5 or higher regardless of their normal temp? Or is that not true for others of you with lower normal temps? Darryl PSC/UC 96, Tx 02, rePSC 04 > > I find this very interesting. My own temp runs 96.7 and it is frustrating when you are sick as a dog and you are told that " well your temp is only 99 " . A temp of 99 for me high and it is sometimes hard to get medical personnel to listen to that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Good question - I've wondered the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.