Guest guest Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 Sorry, this is a little long winded... about labeling I've been through the same problem with my son. He has been finally diagnosed (at 4 years) as having sensory processing disorder with oral and verbal apraxia. When we saw a neurologist at 2.5 years he said " PDDNOS " . But he also suggested something to my husband and I that ended up working out great for my son. He suggested that we allow him to put a diagnosis of " autism " . He said that he believed that he was on the spectrum and that the only way to guarantee that we got all of the services through the school district that he needed was to go this way. We didn't really care what he called " it " , we just wanted Bobby to get everything that was needed, so we said sure. He went to the township preschool disabled program when he turned 3 and didn't make that much progress. I wanted to see how or if he would progress, so I didn't push the " autism " diagnosis although I had informed them verbally of it. After a year in the program, his teacher told me that she could not give him what he needed, that he needed special attention (basically, all of the techniques used to teach kids diagnosed with autism). I then wrote a letter to the school district and informed them that my child needed to be in a full day program for autism and occupational therapy to address sensory issues. I also forwarded a copy of the report from the neurologist. He started the program in the summer and what an incredible difference! He started speaking (words) within a week and is now saying phrases. Some speech is still not very clear, but he's improving on a daily basis. He is finally in the learning environment where he needs to be. His confidence in social situations has changed dramatically. He used to isolate himself at school - now he approaches kids in the playground to play. His appetite has improved and he seems so much happier (as are his parents!). When I took him to the developmental pediatrician in August, she told me I had done the best thing possible for my son. She said she gets sooo many parents in her office complaining about a lack of services for their children but they won't allow their child to be " labeled " . She made the updated diagnosis of SPD but warned me NOT to share this diagnosis with the school district because they could take away those services without that disgnosis. She also told me NOT to move - that my school district was the place to be right now for Bobby. I know when I told others that we had allowed a diagnosis of autism, some were appalled. They said that it may hurt him in the future being labeled " autistic " . One woman even said that her son's college application asked this question and that I was dooming him in the future. Our thoughts were, he can't even speak - we don't even know if he'll be able to go to college or ever be independent, who cares about 14 years from now? Just my 2 cents... > > > > > > I don't understand how they can diagnos a child that young > unless > > the symtpms are evident. PDD-NOS means they are unsure.... > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on globally dev. delay? > > > > > > I am getting my endorsement / masters in autism...any info > would > > be helpful for me to research. > > > > > > Thank you!!!! > > > Tonya > > > > > Hi Tonya....they can and do diagnos kids at around age two. Our > > first pdd dx came when my son was about 20 months old....he had > > stopped babbling, became extremely picky with foods, and was > self- > > stimming. > > He also seemed social, lovable and warm. They gave him dx of > pddnos. > > (later when he was around 4 he got dx of apraxia.) He is not > global > > dev delayed but when he was 2 they thought he may possably > > be...which some people think is the same as MR. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 This is an interesting story. I've heard so many warnings about not allowing one's child to be mislabeled just to get services and how children have languished when placed in programs intended for autistic children and yet clearly (from your example) it is beneficial in some cases. It's just so hard to know what the right thing to do is. I personally wish everyone could just move away from the labels when children are this young and just address the weaknesses regardless of what causes them. Every child who needs treatment deserves it and parents shouldn't have to agree to a diagnosis that isn't correct just to get it (and certainly shouldn't have to worry about how it will affect things 14 years down the road). Congratulations on your son's progress. It sounds like he's doing great. > > > > > > > > I don't understand how they can diagnos a child that young > > unless > > > the symtpms are evident. PDD-NOS means they are unsure.... > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on globally dev. delay? > > > > > > > > I am getting my endorsement / masters in autism...any info > > would > > > be helpful for me to research. > > > > > > > > Thank you!!!! > > > > Tonya > > > > > > > Hi Tonya....they can and do diagnos kids at around age two. Our > > > first pdd dx came when my son was about 20 months old....he had > > > stopped babbling, became extremely picky with foods, and was > > self- > > > stimming. > > > He also seemed social, lovable and warm. They gave him dx of > > pddnos. > > > (later when he was around 4 he got dx of apraxia.) He is not > > global > > > dev delayed but when he was 2 they thought he may possably > > > be...which some people think is the same as MR. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 great point! ----------------------------------------- This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JP Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 Good point. I think the difference is this: If a child IS autistic, or PDD, or anywhere on the spectrum, a placement that is gearerd towards ABA is absolutely the right thing, and in many cases if early intervention is provided a child CAN make significant gains and sometimes even lose the diagnosis in favor of another one as was the case for Bobby. Clearly, then, the emphasis should be on getting an accurate diagnosis as early as possible from a reputable, informed developmental ped who has lots of experience diagnosing many different kinds of conditions. In my son's case, the diagnosis was always dyspraxia, and that was because his deficits were in the area of oral, verbal, and motor dyspraxia. The dev ped that diagnosed him at Kaiser was the former head of a regional center and otherwise well-versed in autism given her ties to the MIND Institute. Dr. Agin's credentials are even more impressive. My son did not stand out from his peers other than in the areas of oral/motor/verbal apraxia. He very much wanted (and still very much wants) to speak/write/play sports just like everyone else. After the Kaiser dev ped suggested in a follow-up appt. that 5 hours per week of handwriting utilizing an ABA approach might be helpful in getting him to write, his OT said something along the lines of this: " It is not that he does not want to write, it is that he is neurologically incapable of performing. " Under the circumstances, what he needed was sensory integration based OT and not ABA. When I asked Dr. Agin about the other dev ped's suggestion, she said that it would be fine to offer up an occasional M & M as a reward if he wrote something well, but she did not suggest I track down an ABA therapist for 5 hours per week of ABA-based handwriting training - instead, she endorsed what we were already doing: Handwriting Without Tears. Again, I think the issue becomes getting an accurate diagnosis because the therapy that will go along with that diagnosis and the classroom setting will likely be different based on the dx. It was good for my son to be in a typical preschool with typical kids getting lots of therapy on the side, and it is good for him now to be in a mainstream K with typical kids while continuing to get therapy on the side. He is performing well: following directions, getting along with others, singing loudly & confidently, loving school. I think for most kids who are dyspraxic/apraxic and not autistic (including PDD) the same kind of exposure to typical kids in a typical setting would be ideal - but that's just my opinion and I respect the fact that others may disagree. It wasn't easy on him or me when he was the only kid still struggling to write his name, or draw a picture, or put on his jacket. But he has many other strengths and those strengths blossomed and continue to blossom. Another thing I've learned from this process is that while it is incredibly helpful to share stories and gain insight & courage from one another, it is important to keep in mind that without actually meeting another parent or another child in person it is very difficult to accurately compare child 1 and child 2 and condition 1 and condition 2 - hence, again, the need for help and feedback from a diagnosing professional who is well-respected & well-versed in a wide variety of neurological conditions. > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand how they can diagnos a child that young > > > unless > > > > the symtpms are evident. PDD-NOS means they are unsure.... > > > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on globally dev. delay? > > > > > > > > > > I am getting my endorsement / masters in autism...any info > > > would > > > > be helpful for me to research. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you!!!! > > > > > Tonya > > > > > > > > > Hi Tonya....they can and do diagnos kids at around age two. > Our > > > > first pdd dx came when my son was about 20 months old....he > had > > > > stopped babbling, became extremely picky with foods, and was > > > self- > > > > stimming. > > > > He also seemed social, lovable and warm. They gave him dx of > > > pddnos. > > > > (later when he was around 4 he got dx of apraxia.) He is not > > > global > > > > dev delayed but when he was 2 they thought he may possably > > > > be...which some people think is the same as MR. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 It's important for kids to get the ASD diagnosis as early as possible. If the dx is delayed, they may get speech and OT therapy, but they don't get the intensive intervention that may allow them to improve dramatically (and possibly to the point of losing the diagnosis eventually). I've seen many sad situations where a child's parents took a " wait and see " approach on a neurologist's advice, and now have older children who can't speak at all, aren't potty-trained, etc. Maybe that would have been the outcome any way, but intensive, early intervention gives a child with ASD their best chance for improvement. I also think that the reason my daughter has now recovered from apraxia and ASD is exactly because her neurologist diagnosed her right as she turned 2. If he had waited, we might not have started ABA at such a young age, and I do not think she would have recovered. It scares me to think how much we owe to her doctor for diagnosing her early, when many docs in my area are reluctant to diagnose at that age. Early diagnosis is crucial. I just hope that I have to worry about the affect of my son's ASD diagnosis on college applications. And I think he's doing great and he probably will go to college, but I am confident that he would be doing much better now if he had been diagnosed at a younger age (he was 4). > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand how they can diagnos a child that young > > > unless > > > > the symtpms are evident. PDD-NOS means they are unsure.... > > > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on globally dev. delay? > > > > > > > > > > I am getting my endorsement / masters in autism...any info > > > would > > > > be helpful for me to research. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you!!!! > > > > > Tonya > > > > > > > > > Hi Tonya....they can and do diagnos kids at around age two. > Our > > > > first pdd dx came when my son was about 20 months old....he > had > > > > stopped babbling, became extremely picky with foods, and was > > > self- > > > > stimming. > > > > He also seemed social, lovable and warm. They gave him dx of > > > pddnos. > > > > (later when he was around 4 he got dx of apraxia.) He is not > > > global > > > > dev delayed but when he was 2 they thought he may possably > > > > be...which some people think is the same as MR. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 This is an interesting story. I've heard so many warnings about not allowing one's child to be mislabeled just to get services and how children have languished when placed in programs intended for autistic children and yet clearly (from your example) it is beneficial in some cases. It's just so hard to know what the right thing to do is. I personally wish everyone could just move away from the labels when children are this young and just address the weaknesses regardless of what causes them. Every child who needs treatment deserves it and parents shouldn't have to agree to a diagnosis that isn't correct just to get it (and certainly shouldn't have to worry about how it will affect things 14 years down the road). Congratulations on your son's progress. It sounds like he's doing great. > > > > > > > > I don't understand how they can diagnos a child that young > > unless > > > the symtpms are evident. PDD-NOS means they are unsure.... > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on globally dev. delay? > > > > > > > > I am getting my endorsement / masters in autism...any info > > would > > > be helpful for me to research. > > > > > > > > Thank you!!!! > > > > Tonya > > > > > > > Hi Tonya....they can and do diagnos kids at around age two. Our > > > first pdd dx came when my son was about 20 months old....he had > > > stopped babbling, became extremely picky with foods, and was > > self- > > > stimming. > > > He also seemed social, lovable and warm. They gave him dx of > > pddnos. > > > (later when he was around 4 he got dx of apraxia.) He is not > > global > > > dev delayed but when he was 2 they thought he may possably > > > be...which some people think is the same as MR. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Good point. I think the difference is this: If a child IS autistic, or PDD, or anywhere on the spectrum, a placement that is gearerd towards ABA is absolutely the right thing, and in many cases if early intervention is provided a child CAN make significant gains and sometimes even lose the diagnosis in favor of another one as was the case for Bobby. Clearly, then, the emphasis should be on getting an accurate diagnosis as early as possible from a reputable, informed developmental ped who has lots of experience diagnosing many different kinds of conditions. In my son's case, the diagnosis was always dyspraxia, and that was because his deficits were in the area of oral, verbal, and motor dyspraxia. The dev ped that diagnosed him at Kaiser was the former head of a regional center and otherwise well-versed in autism given her ties to the MIND Institute. Dr. Agin's credentials are even more impressive. My son did not stand out from his peers other than in the areas of oral/motor/verbal apraxia. He very much wanted (and still very much wants) to speak/write/play sports just like everyone else. After the Kaiser dev ped suggested in a follow-up appt. that 5 hours per week of handwriting utilizing an ABA approach might be helpful in getting him to write, his OT said something along the lines of this: " It is not that he does not want to write, it is that he is neurologically incapable of performing. " Under the circumstances, what he needed was sensory integration based OT and not ABA. When I asked Dr. Agin about the other dev ped's suggestion, she said that it would be fine to offer up an occasional M & M as a reward if he wrote something well, but she did not suggest I track down an ABA therapist for 5 hours per week of ABA-based handwriting training - instead, she endorsed what we were already doing: Handwriting Without Tears. Again, I think the issue becomes getting an accurate diagnosis because the therapy that will go along with that diagnosis and the classroom setting will likely be different based on the dx. It was good for my son to be in a typical preschool with typical kids getting lots of therapy on the side, and it is good for him now to be in a mainstream K with typical kids while continuing to get therapy on the side. He is performing well: following directions, getting along with others, singing loudly & confidently, loving school. I think for most kids who are dyspraxic/apraxic and not autistic (including PDD) the same kind of exposure to typical kids in a typical setting would be ideal - but that's just my opinion and I respect the fact that others may disagree. It wasn't easy on him or me when he was the only kid still struggling to write his name, or draw a picture, or put on his jacket. But he has many other strengths and those strengths blossomed and continue to blossom. Another thing I've learned from this process is that while it is incredibly helpful to share stories and gain insight & courage from one another, it is important to keep in mind that without actually meeting another parent or another child in person it is very difficult to accurately compare child 1 and child 2 and condition 1 and condition 2 - hence, again, the need for help and feedback from a diagnosing professional who is well-respected & well-versed in a wide variety of neurological conditions. > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand how they can diagnos a child that young > > > unless > > > > the symtpms are evident. PDD-NOS means they are unsure.... > > > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on globally dev. delay? > > > > > > > > > > I am getting my endorsement / masters in autism...any info > > > would > > > > be helpful for me to research. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you!!!! > > > > > Tonya > > > > > > > > > Hi Tonya....they can and do diagnos kids at around age two. > Our > > > > first pdd dx came when my son was about 20 months old....he > had > > > > stopped babbling, became extremely picky with foods, and was > > > self- > > > > stimming. > > > > He also seemed social, lovable and warm. They gave him dx of > > > pddnos. > > > > (later when he was around 4 he got dx of apraxia.) He is not > > > global > > > > dev delayed but when he was 2 they thought he may possably > > > > be...which some people think is the same as MR. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 It's important for kids to get the ASD diagnosis as early as possible. If the dx is delayed, they may get speech and OT therapy, but they don't get the intensive intervention that may allow them to improve dramatically (and possibly to the point of losing the diagnosis eventually). I've seen many sad situations where a child's parents took a " wait and see " approach on a neurologist's advice, and now have older children who can't speak at all, aren't potty-trained, etc. Maybe that would have been the outcome any way, but intensive, early intervention gives a child with ASD their best chance for improvement. I also think that the reason my daughter has now recovered from apraxia and ASD is exactly because her neurologist diagnosed her right as she turned 2. If he had waited, we might not have started ABA at such a young age, and I do not think she would have recovered. It scares me to think how much we owe to her doctor for diagnosing her early, when many docs in my area are reluctant to diagnose at that age. Early diagnosis is crucial. I just hope that I have to worry about the affect of my son's ASD diagnosis on college applications. And I think he's doing great and he probably will go to college, but I am confident that he would be doing much better now if he had been diagnosed at a younger age (he was 4). > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand how they can diagnos a child that young > > > unless > > > > the symtpms are evident. PDD-NOS means they are unsure.... > > > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on globally dev. delay? > > > > > > > > > > I am getting my endorsement / masters in autism...any info > > > would > > > > be helpful for me to research. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you!!!! > > > > > Tonya > > > > > > > > > Hi Tonya....they can and do diagnos kids at around age two. > Our > > > > first pdd dx came when my son was about 20 months old....he > had > > > > stopped babbling, became extremely picky with foods, and was > > > self- > > > > stimming. > > > > He also seemed social, lovable and warm. They gave him dx of > > > pddnos. > > > > (later when he was around 4 he got dx of apraxia.) He is not > > > global > > > > dev delayed but when he was 2 they thought he may possably > > > > be...which some people think is the same as MR. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.