Guest guest Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Hi athan; These are really interesting questions! I would suspect that the further inhibition of CFTR would not be good for PSCers, but I don't want to be responsible for banning chocolate from the diet! I've been reading a lot about CFTR lately, and one thing I have noticed is that in the gut CFTR is responsible for secreting bicarbonate (HCO3-) to make the pH sufficiently alkaline (i.e. less acidic) for the enzyme intestinal alkaline phosphatase to function properly. CFTR patients have a low activity of intestinal alkaline phosphatase. It has recently been shown that intestinal alkaline phosphatase is responsible for removing phosphate groups from the nasty compound lipopolysaccharide (LPS) produced by many bacteria. This removal of phosphate groups from LPS makes the copound much less toxic. Bottom line ... low intestinal alkaline phosphtase activity = high levels of LPS. LPS can be detoxified further by being bound to bacterial/permeability increasing protein (BPI). But in cystic fibrosis patients this system also becomes overwhelmed; increased levels of circulating BPI-LPS complexes lead to production of anti- BPI antibodies which further exacerbate the problem of LPS detoxification. Interestingly, the other disease with a high percentage of patients with anti-BPI antibodies is PSC! High levels of LPS can cause gut inflammation, and a leaky gut. This can lead to LPS transport to the liver via the portal vein causing further inflammation and cholestasis. One study shows that LPS is subtantially elevated in livers of PSC patients. So, inhibition of CFTR ---> acid pH ---> low intestinal alkaline phosphatase activity ---> high LPS ---> BPI-LPS complexes --> anti- BPI antibodies ---> high LPS ---> liver inflammation & cholestasis Best regards, Dave R. > > Link to full text: > http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/135/10/2320 > > *ABSTRACT > Cocoa beans have historically been used as a treatment for diarrhea, > leading us to hypothesize that polyphenols contained in cocoa inhibit > intestinal Cl†" secretion. In this study, the dose-dependent effects of > flavonoid compounds present in cocoa, or molecularly closely related > compounds, were tested on forskolin-stimulated cystic fibrosis > transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-mediated Cl†" secretion across > T84 colonic epithelia in Ussing chambers. Addition of cocoa extract or > cocoa flavanols to the mucosal side of tissues caused partial inhibition > following is-Menten kinetics and resulted in a rank order of > maximum blocker effects as follows: epicatechin > catechin ≥ > standardized cocoa preparation ≥ procyanidin B2. Half-maximal blocker > concentrations (Ki) were not substantially different between the tested > preparations and were in the range of 100 µmol/L. For comparison, the > structurally related flavonoids, quercetin and luteolin, caused a total > block of Cl†" currents with Ki values similar to the cocoa flavanols > tested. Morin and baicalein were less effective blockers. Effects of > test compounds on mucosal redox potential did not correlate with blocker > activity. These data indicate that cocoa flavanols target intestinal > CFTR Cl†" transport and may serve as mild inhibitors of cAMP- stimulated > Cl†" secretion in the intestine.* > > > I noticed this article, and the fact that it involves CTFR raised some > questions in my mind. First, if the research linking PSC to CFTR > deficiency is correct, does this mean that chocolate which seems to > further inhibit CFTR might cause additional problems for us? Or does it > mean that since many of us suffer from diarrhea we should eat more > chocolate (since inhibiting CFTR may help with diarrhea)? Or is there > another conclusion, or no conclusion to be drawn from this? > > Just curious! > > athan > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 wrote: > So, inhibition of CFTR ---> acid pH ---> low intestinal alkaline > phosphatase activity ---> high LPS ---> BPI-LPS complexes --> anti- > BPI antibodies ---> high LPS ---> liver inflammation & cholestasis Very interesting! Maybe I shouldn't go binge on dark chocolate after all! Thanks for your insight! athan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.