Guest guest Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 >My understanding is that they can't refuse you one service (e.g. >speech, OT) because you refuse to accept another (e.g. free >schooling). However, I haven't found anyone with specific knowledge >on the law, and the district denies that they have to provide the >services regardless of school choice. Have you looked into this >issue in your state? (We're in NJ.) If you refuse public school they are not required to provide services sadly. Most districts will still provide something, but not all. These children are provided for under a service plan, not an IEP. You can search the IDEA for more information on this. One way many get around this is to argue and have the IEP team agree that the alternative placement is necessary to provide the child with his LRE. This is not to say the " best " or " most appropriate " environment, but the " least restrictive. " They are not the same. Some districts leap at the chance to only need to provide a few hours of therapies to a child who is homeschooled or placed in a private school, but others, like mine, fight it tooth and nail. Sadly it's about money and resources. Our district here doesn't seem too smart about finances. They are refusing to pay $174/mo for my son's private preschool, but they are happy to pay their teachers, therapists and attorneys to attend over 15 hours of IEPs to fight us on this! They want him in their special needs school because then they get the per student $ for him which they don't get if they provide a SLP to his private school. It's crazy! For us it was KEY to have it written into his IEP that the public schools placement was not his LRE and therefore they could not provide FAPE so he was placed out of district. They are providing the therapist (finally - well one of them they are refusing all but the speech therapy) but they are still not paying for the tuition. Miche Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Hi Miche! I agree that schools are not obligated to provide the " best " placement, and of course also agree that by Federal law children are entitled to be schooled in the " least restrictive environment, but perhaps I misunderstand your point about using the word appropriate. True you may not want to say " most appropriate " because that may sound to much like " best " but don't underestimate the word appropriate when used alone. Schools are obligated to provide " appropriate " placement and therapy for a child's needs. That would be the definition of LRE (least restrictive environment) but of course covers so much more. About school therapy being provided for a child who is homeschooled or in private school -I'd get that in writing from the school and ask them to explain why, and 'then' check out the IEP stuff online. First of all if you check the archives or join a local support group you'll find some who do have therapy through the school after pulling the child out of the rest of the program, and second because they won't put it in writing if it's not legal because it opens them up to a lawsuit. So the quick way to learn the truth (yes you can get therapy even if you refuse the rest of the program). You do by rule want to play the game of having the entire IEP team agree and not appear to be hostile about pulling a child out of a program. Never say never because you'd be shocked how many rabbits the public school can pull from the hat when push comes to shove. Not that you have to shove -but you get the point. You can be nice when you advocate most of the time, but you can also make it clear that you know your child's rights and won't allow for inappropriate placement or therapy..or statements from them! (see -can't use the word too much!) ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Hi again Miche! Hope some of the members who have secured this can jump in. The laws are not always black and white. This is why it's best to ask the school when you are not sure about something to put what they claim to be " fact " in writing and explain why. If it's not legal they won't put it in writing. And if they won't put it in writing, you can put it in writing to them what they said and ask if you " misunderstood " what they were trying to say. By law (again) if it's not legal -you just created part of the paper trail that would stand up in a court of law if it ever had to come to that. I myself as much as I did in advocating never had to go that far to secure appropriate (and in the case of the Summit Speech School appropriate 'and' best!) placement. Oh -and you'll get the real answer from either approach above. And if as below they say they will provide it but don't... let me know what state you are in and I'll tell you who to contact. It's a game -and two can play that game! Best! ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.