Guest guest Posted March 15, 2007 Report Share Posted March 15, 2007 J. Clin. Invest. 117: 514-521 (2007). The fundamental basis of inflammatory bowel disease Warren Strober, Ivan Fuss and Mannon http://www.jci.org/cgi/content/full/117/3/514 This paper argues that mutations like the NOD2/CARD15 gene mutation found in Crohn's disease leads to " increased activation of NF-kB " , which then triggers proinflammatory cytokine production ... increased levels of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 in particular ... leading eventually to the differentiation of T cells producing interferon-gamma and interleukin-17, the proinflammatory cytokines responsible for Crohn's disease. How can this scheme be reconciled with the inhibition of activation of NF-kB causing inflammatory bowel disease? Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2007 Report Share Posted March 16, 2007 , I noticed in the Nenci paper that they also discussed a knockout of IKK2alpha that reduced but didn't block NFkB function. This partial downregulation of NFkB did not lead to spontaneous colitis. Only when NFkB was completely blocked by either NEMO (aka IKKgamma) or a combination of IKK1alpha and IKK2alpha knockouts did they see the colitis.I think all of their knockouts were conditional, under the villin promoter so they are only knocked out in the colon epithelium, not the immune system. It seems like some low level of NFkB signal is required to prevent the colonic epithelial cells from being killed by TNFalpha signaling that is elicited by bacterial growth. It seems like a total lack of NFkB activity is probably not what most with colitis have (because we wouldn't be able to keep our colons for years and years), so I wonder how relevant a model this really is? The BMJ paper you referred to distinguished between NFkB activation in the colonic mucosa and in the macrophages. So maybe you need NFkB in the colonic epithelia for them to survive, but if it is overly active in the macrophages you get colitis? The papers you mention use biopsy materials and mash them up to do Western blots. If macrophages are infiltrating the biopsy, you would see higher NF-kB activity. In the NEMO knockout, they isolate the epithelial cells and activate them with LPS to see the response. So would there be any macrophages in those samples in the Nenci paper? Maybe that's the answer to the paradox? Martha UC, 1979, PSC, 1992 > How can this scheme be reconciled with the inhibition of activation of > NF-kB causing inflammatory bowel disease? > > Dave > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2007 Report Share Posted March 16, 2007 Thank you Martha! Excellent suggestions! Best regards, Dave R. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.