Guest guest Posted March 29, 2007 Report Share Posted March 29, 2007 I'm trying to learn from your interpretation too, because I also get copies of my records (and then puzzle over them). As I recall, had his CT because of somewhat elevated CA19-9; I believe it was well under 100. Does that change anything in the type or frequency of tests you recommend? The contrast is administered IV, so does it primarily show blood perfusion of the liver? Does the attenuated response to contrast indicate that smaller blood vessels are blocked in the abnormal areas? I also wonder when they say in a report " there were no focal masses in the liver " , because isn't cholangiocarcinoma usually extrahepatic, and it follows the ducts? So would it really form a focal mass? I sort of think of it as some kind of pernicious lichen on a tree trunk, but I have no idea if that's at all accurate. Thanks for your expert help. Martha (MA) > > The last report suggests that only two areas of the liver appear to be > functioning and looking fairly normal; the lateral part of the left > lobe and the posterior section of the right lobe. No definitive area of > ductal enlargement is seen and therefore dilation of the ducts would > probably not be of benefit. However, a contrast MRI might provide a > better picture of what is going on with the liver and the ducts. No > mass is seen and this is a good thing because it means that there is no > cancer to cause the picture of the poorly functioning areas of the > liver. On the positive side the liver doesn't appear enlarged or > shrunken and neither does the spleen. An enlarged spleen and a fibrotic > looking liver mean that portal hypertension and varices are far more > likely to be present. Since your son has been diagnosed with PSC > further imaging studies should probably be ERCPs and MRIs, because what > you want to know is what is going on with the ducts which tend to be > better seen on MRI and more obviously using ERCPs. The timing and > repetition of these studies depends on symptoms and other signs. The > other test that may be necessary down the road is an endoscopy to look > for varices. Early on none of these tests needs to be done on a regular > basis. > > Aubrey, MD > PSC '81, UC '90, LTX '98, Recurrence '05 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2007 Report Share Posted March 29, 2007 Martha You really do have a good memory. I am impressed! The elevated CA19-9 was the reason for this CT scan. Thank you for taking the time to write. I am glad that we have this board. My sister has ALS and while they have a great clinic and an ALS Associataion that is very helpful and they have monthly in-person ALS support group meeting that we can attend - they don't seem to have an active online support group although they do have online support groups they do not have multiple daily posts (unless there is one that I have not yet found). Kind Regards, Nichole Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2007 Report Share Posted March 30, 2007 , this disease can go in fits and starts. You can be reasonably good for a long while and then feel awful. Get a bit better again, sometimes, and then go on for a while as if nothing is happening. Or it can be quite progressive and you can get really unwell quite rapidly. It's quite variable, as noted by all our members. The most common pattern is a long slow decline with periods of exacerbation during this decline. I had liver problems for 18 years before tx. Initially it was quite bad with fatigue being the main symptom. I found that really devastating. But that improved a bit or I got used to it. Then came bouts of itchiness on and off that drove me crazy. That added to the insomnia I was experiencing. Which made the fatigue worse. I'm a bit concerned by your saying that the colon growth has returned and the surgeons or doctors don't want to remove it. Has he had regular colonoscopies and biopsies of this area? Growths in the colon can turn malignant. And if he has UC this increases the risk of malignancy. One of the sad aspects of this disease is that you don't know how bad you'll feel until you experience it as the disease gets worse. For example, I thought the fatigue and inability to do much was really terrible when it started. But in the months leading up to my tx this got much, much worse. It was indescribable how the simplest activity wore me out. The bouts of cholangitis was horrible as well. But I never experienced any that didn't go away in a day. I'm sure others who had ascending cholangitis experienced much worse agony. I encourage you to get that new colon lesion biopsied soon if it hasn't been. I had a tough day yesterday because I had to tell one of my patients that she has metastases in her liver and lungs from a cancer removed from her colon 2 years ago. Martha, you are correct in thinking that something is blocking the activity in that part of the liver with lower attenuation. But it may be on the output side of things. In other words the flow of bile may be reduced due to shrinking of the small bile ducts, so called small duct PSC. Or scarring from chronic inflammation of the liver tissue. Because of the concern about cancer they were looking for a mass such as a liver metastases from the colon. This would appear as a sort of ball or roundish lesion in the tissue of the liver. Your interpretation of cholangiocarcinoma is probably correct as well. It would be like a moss on the common bile duct but growing inwards (and outwards) choking off the flow of bile. I'm not sure what layer of the duct it starts in and because it may start in one of the outer layers, brushings of the duct may not get any cancer cells until too late. This is one reason why suspicion of development of this cancer is required in interpreting scans (MRIs) and why doing a tx before it develops is so important. My tx hepatologist told me on my first visit (I had liver disease for 16 years by then) that he wanted me on the list ASAP so that I could possibly get a new liver before I developed CC. His statement was something to the effect that by 20 years of having liver disease (PSC) the risks of having CC at the time of tx were unacceptable. Almost forget, CC is extrahepatic. Aubrey, MD PSC '81, UC '90, LTX '98, Recurrence '05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.