Guest guest Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Hello Friends - I just saw a CA pulmonologist. From what I've read here and elsewhere, having an open lung biopsy is risky...and the value depends on your risk vs. info gain from having one. My primary care dr. said 'no, they aren't necessarily accurate, subject you to unnecessary risks'. When I told the pulmon. dr. that I didn't think that I wanted to do that...he asked why (and I told him), he asked me to do some research at the American Lung Assoc. and other sites and re-consider. He said that doing it would give him information about whether or not I have an active infection (I think that I do, as I often cough up colored stuff), and what kind of medical treatment to pursue. I'm 70 yrs. old, have coronary artery disease, diab. 2, chronic kidney diease in 1 remaining kidney, GERD, hiatal hernia, achalasia, two pre-Barrett's esophageal lesions, osteoporosis, arthritis, glaucoma...the list goes on... I was first dx'd. 4/08, put on O2 in Aug 08, no PF meds yet. Questions? Opinions? Personal experiences? Joan M. in Northern CA/San Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.