Guest guest Posted October 27, 2012 Report Share Posted October 27, 2012 (((((Ash))))) Your nada was horrifically abusive. I'm truly surprised that you and your older sister were not removed from her care permanently. Apparently some arrangement was made for your care while your mother was hospitalized, but if I understand correctly it was not permanent. No child should be left alone with a parent who is dysfunctional enough to bash her preschool child's head against the wall hard enough to make blood spurt out, and no child should be left alone with a parent who makes a serious suicide attempt, in my opinion. What astonishes me the most is that even though your mother was dysfunctional enough to require hospitalization so that her mental illness was documented (she was " in the system " ) that you and your sister were not rescued. I can't get over that, it just defies all logic and reason. The system failed you; your dad (if he was in the picture at all) failed you, your grandparents/extended family failed you, and society failed to provide the proper intervention and care for you and your sister. You are both lucky to even be alive. I agree with you: I think its the mentally ill and/or substance-abusing mothers who are just functional enough to " skim under the radar " in public, but who are actually violent with their kids and self-destructive/suicidal in private (when they are alone with just their children).... THESE are the people who create the tragic headlines about the murder or maiming their own children and often themselves at the same time. My own opinion is that our culture/society has a genuine " blind spot " about the nature of motherhood, and views motherhood with an almost religious reverence. Society seems to view all mothers as " all good. " It has taken a very, very long time for our society/culture to (sadly, regretfully) accept the notion that fathers and other male authority figures can and do harm children, mostly sexually. Society in general was in deep denial that incest is so prevalent: the idea that a father could sexually prey on his own children (including the notion that brothers or uncles or grandfathers or cousins could be sexual predators within their own families, or that priests could be sexual predators within their own flock or parish)...that was a shocking, forbidden topic not too long ago. But that myth that fatherhood is somehow sacred and fathers can do no wrong to their own children, has been shattered. Repeatedly. The Penn State scandal was the most recent example of the shattering of the myth that a beloved adult male authority figure / coach/ father would NEVER misuse his authority to sexually exploit the children in his care. The myth that mothers are all somehow above reproach, that motherhood is a virtually sacred state of being, and that there is a " maternal instinct " that prevents a mother from harming her own child even if the mother is obviously severely mentally ill.... that is going to be the next myth that gets " busted. " At least, I hope so. -Annie > > I was thinking this morning about how we respond to our bpd nadas/fadas as young children and how this affects our development later. I thought my blog might be of interest to some. > > http://ashanam.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/growing-up-with-borderline/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2012 Report Share Posted October 27, 2012 Annie, Thanks for reading. The 70s were not good years for child protection. My social worker, I'm sure, did her best, but some judges are just assholes, and I imagine that's what happened in my case. I was removed for a time, but then returned. I wasn't removed after the suicide attempt, because my mother wasn't there--she was hospitalized, and so therefore not a threat. My aunt, I think, came for a while. What they didn't put together is that my dad was worse. I think people have a blind spot generally for how evil ordinary human people can be. Thanks again, Ashana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2012 Report Share Posted October 27, 2012 I should add to that that social services depends to a large extent on the public to make reports. Social workers do follow up once you are in the system for a while, but not indefinitely. If no further reports are made, then you fall off the radar pretty quickly, as there are always new, more urgent cases going on. But so much of the time people are too afraid or too discouraged about what will happen after a report is made that they never make one in the first place. And since there were no mandated reporting laws in those days, no one may have made a report again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2012 Report Share Posted October 27, 2012 AMEN to that!! Both Annie and Ash, It just amazes me that people (family members) neighbors etc...just looked the other way and convinced themselves... " oh I am sure she/he will be just fine, or none of my business, I am sure it is not that bad! " BS! I grew up in the 60's and 70's and to my knowledge I did not know of any hotline or number to call to plead " Please get me out of her care " ! This cannot possibly be normal or healthy I was just a young girl. I did not feel safe or nurtured nor wanted let a lone valued or loved. The hate and rage was oozing out of her every pore every time she spoke to me or raged or berated me daily! I am very quick to come to someones defense when I see that they are being talked down to or abused in anyway. The Sandusky scandal had my blood boiling and still does, along with all the Catholic priests! I am sorry that all of us had to be subjected to this and try to form healthy relationships and have high self esteem and confidence through out the rest of our lives. My Nada got away with it all and will never acknowledge any of it, she has subsided quite a bit, but she is now 75 and I am 52!! The first thought on my mind the second I start to wake up is thinking and mourning how the last 52 yrs could have gone had I had the upbringing like most of my peers! I just wanted to commend you Annie on your outstanding depth and understanding every time you write to anyone. Ash, my heart aches for what you endured. I subscribed to your Blog....thank you for writing it, I am listening and care! > > > > I was thinking this morning about how we respond to our bpd nadas/fadas as young children and how this affects our development later. I thought my blog might be of interest to some. > > > > http://ashanam.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/growing-up-with-borderline/ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2012 Report Share Posted October 27, 2012 In the 70s, at least in California, there was someone you could call. Whether it was a hotline, or just the Department of Child and Family Services, I don't know. But I remember ads. Unfortunately, I continue to hear reasons for not calling, including from people who have lived very close to mentally unstable people and should know better. On the one hand, one myth is that social services won't do anything anyway and the parent will just take it out on the kid. Not generally true: when the cops come out to your house, you generally behave at least for a while. If there is an uptick in abuse, the parent usually will tell the child that it is because the child told. Nonsense. The parent was going to abuse the child in any case. They always have. If it hadn't been for telling, it would have been for something else. On the other, I hear that people are afraid of what will happen if the child is removed--whether they will separated from the child, or if they will be able to live with the guilt, or if they will be taken seriously, or if being removed will just be more traumatic for the child. It's shameful how much we think of ourselves when the welfare of children is at stake. It's not about us. Period. I was removed for a while. It helped. The abuse when I got back was horrendous. But I don't wish I had never been taken away. Six months of love and care and stable family life was worth it. That was the best part of my childhood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2012 Report Share Posted October 27, 2012 , Thanks for reading! Ashana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2012 Report Share Posted October 31, 2012 Ash, I too was raised for a time in a loving household. My nada was in a psych ward for at least six months when I was about six months til I was just over a year old. What astounds me, is that nada and my dad came and got me with NO warning within DAYS of nadas release from the hospital. I went to bed the doted on baby with four older siblings and woke up alone with a woman they just let out of the psych ward. I would hope that would never happen again in this day and age. (this occurred in the late sixties) C > > In the 70s, at least in California, there was someone you could call. Whether it was a hotline, or just the Department of Child and Family Services, I don't know. But I remember ads. > > Unfortunately, I continue to hear reasons for not calling, including from people who have lived very close to mentally unstable people and should know better. On the one hand, one myth is that social services won't do anything anyway and the parent will just take it out on the kid. Not generally true: when the cops come out to your house, you generally behave at least for a while. If there is an uptick in abuse, the parent usually will tell the child that it is because the child told. Nonsense. The parent was going to abuse the child in any case. They always have. If it hadn't been for telling, it would have been for something else. > > On the other, I hear that people are afraid of what will happen if the child is removed--whether they will separated from the child, or if they will be able to live with the guilt, or if they will be taken seriously, or if being removed will just be more traumatic for the child. > > It's shameful how much we think of ourselves when the welfare of children is at stake. It's not about us. Period. > > I was removed for a while. It helped. The abuse when I got back was horrendous. But I don't wish I had never been taken away. Six months of love and care and stable family life was worth it. That was the best part of my childhood. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2012 Report Share Posted October 31, 2012 C, I think that's pretty much what happened to me. I think there was a certain amount of explaining that the social worker tried to do. I'm not sure. People talked to me, but it's very difficult to remember what they said. I mainly remember everyone seemed very upset about my return, which made me think I had done something wrong. I think it really doesn't occur to anyone that abused children do bond with their foster parents and being separated from them can be more traumatic than being separated from birth parents. Much is made of the importance of maintaining a bond with birth parents, but none with foster parents who are sometimes the only source of nurturing a child has ever known. That was in about 1985. Take care, Ashana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2012 Report Share Posted November 1, 2012 wow, that was the year I was finishing high school. you are a younun :-) I sometimes say that brief time was where I pulled my strength from to be myself and do what I needed to survive. My dad was supportive and he was someone I could have differing opinions with and not be excommunicated from his love and affection, unlike nada. I can still remember as a pre-schooler being so excited to go to my aunt and uncles house and I would run all over making sure everything was the same. I never realized that it was because I had spent so much time there. I also never noticed that my dad would take me there, but nada never came with us. It was only as an adult, that I put those things together. C > > C, > > I think that's pretty much what happened to me. I think there was a certain amount of explaining that the social worker tried to do. I'm not sure. People talked to me, but it's very difficult to remember what they said. I mainly remember everyone seemed very upset about my return, which made me think I had done something wrong. I think it really doesn't occur to anyone that abused children do bond with their foster parents and being separated from them can be more traumatic than being separated from birth parents. Much is made of the importance of maintaining a bond with birth parents, but none with foster parents who are sometimes the only source of nurturing a child has ever known. > > That was in about 1985. > > Take care, > Ashana > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2012 Report Share Posted November 1, 2012 C, I just can't type. It was 1975. I'm not as young as I might like to be. I absolutely know that those few months in a family that cared for me was important to my ability to make it through the rest of my growing up years. I'm glad for you that you were with relatives you were able to see again. I was placed outside of the family, and when I was removed from their care, it meant the end of that relationship--I never saw them again. That loss left an enormous hole for me. I still remember how badly I missed even the dog. I'm not saying I wish I had been placed with family--they were all crazy. Take care, Ashana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.