Guest guest Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 -----Original Message----- the specialist she sees diagnosed her PSC by blood tests and an MRCP is asymptomatic, the specialist refuses to do an ERCP to absolutely confirm the PSC diagnoses as he feels that ERCPS speed up the course of the disease. Any comments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 Hi ; I think it depends a lot on the expertise of the endoscopist doing the ERCPs. The expert German group (Adolph Stiehl and colleagues) believes that ERCPs, to open dominant bile duct strictures, can help alleviate symptoms and prolong survival free of transplantation: Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2007 Mar;10(2):111-9. Treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Rost D, Kulaksiz H, Stiehl A. Adolf Stiehl, MD Department of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Medizinische Universitatsklinik, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. adolf_stiehl@.... Aims of treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis are as follows: prevention of progression of hepatobiliary disease, reduction of symptoms and consequences of cholestasis (pruritus, osteoporosis), and prevention of complications (colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary cancer). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves biliary secretion and laboratory parameters of cholestasis, but its effects on liver histology and survival are not clear. It reduces the incidence of dysplasias and carcinomas of the colon in patients with colitis and possibly has a beneficial effect on the incidence of bile duct carcinomas. At present, UDCA represents the most promising therapeutic option. Immunosuppressive treatment has not been proven to be effective; it appears to be indicated in the overlap syndrome with autoimmune hepatitis but may be harmful in bacterial cholangitis. Bacterial cholangitis is common in patients with dominant stenoses and requires antibiotic treatment. Endoscopic treatment of dominant stenoses improves cholestasis and prolongs survival in comparison to predicted survival. Pruritus represents a problem in some patients, and cholestyramine represents the first-line treatment. If ineffective, opioid antagonists, rifampin, or ondansetron may be tried. For treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia, calcium and vitamin D supplementation are recommended, and in selected cases, bisphosphonates may be indicated. In patients with severe cholestasis and coagulation defects, parenteral supplementation of vitamin K may be indicated. During treatment, all patients should be regularly screened for colonic and bile duct carcinomas. Patients with cirrhosis of the liver and its complications are treated accordingly, and in end-stage disease, liver transplantation is indicated. PMID: 17391626. But for an asymptomatic patient who has already had an MRCP I can't see any obvious benefit of doing an ERCP .... this probably would not change the treatment, and might run the risk of pancreatitis and/or cholangitis. Best regards, Dave (father of (21); PSC 07/03; UC 08/83) level..LOL.. so what is considered professional level ? > I am in contact with another New Zealander with PSC, the specialsit she sees diagnosed her PSC by blood tests and an MRCP. At the moment she is asymptomatic, the specialsit refuses to do an ERCP to absolutely confirm the PSC diagnoses as he feels that ERCPS speed up the course of the disease. Any comments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.