Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 She didn't say that being on disability was a luxury. She said that BEING on disability allowed her the luxury of being able to take her time in the mornings to take her medication, do a lot of stretching and waking/getting up slowly to whatever her own rhythm was that day. The actual quote is below: " " ...That sounds like what I do. Never just jump ou tof bed and start doing things. Takes a lot of stretching and wriggling around to loosen things up. then I take my med's and fix my Chi tea. Least bit of real pain and back to bed I go.I know I'm one of the very lucky ones on disability and can afford that luxury..... " N. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 I consider it a much deserved payment to those who need it. Especially people with this disease. It is not a luxury. And I am sure that disability does not pay most people even close to the amount they use to work for. I wish I could apply, but I cannot because I still work. If I did not work, I guess I would wind up on the streets and lose my kids or something......then I could apply. But, as long as I am forcing my body to go to work and suffering from it, they will never give me disability because they will say " you are working now.... so why do you think you are disabled " ? A catch 22 I guess. I need it but cannot get it because NOT working is not an option for me because of the length of time it would take to get any disability with this invisible disease. hugs, Debra V. Sherry wrote: Just want those who have not and I hope never need to apply for Social Security Disability...it is NOT a luzury. The process of getting Social Security benefits can be lengthy and exhausting as they have been and continue to be for me. I am trying to attain benefits that are rightfully mine. I have worked since the age of 16 and stopped working when I was 44. I think I paid into it!? I did not choose to become disabled, but I choose to fight for what I believe I deserve. And I find no luxury in that, or the fact that if Social Security approves me, whenever that might be, I will never receive as much money as I did when I worked. Again it is No Luxury! I know the person who said it was a luxury did not mean it, they were only fustrated, but to think someone else might consider it a luxury, angers me. --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 > > Just want those who have not and I hope never need to apply for Social > Security Disability...it is NOT a luzury. The process of getting Social > Security benefits can be lengthy and exhausting as they have been and > continue to be for me. I am trying to attain benefits that are > rightfully mine. I have worked since the age of 16 and stopped working > when I was 44. I think I paid into it!? I did not choose to become > disabled, but I choose to fight for what I believe I deserve. And I > find no luxury in that, or the fact that if Social Security approves > me, whenever that might be, I will never receive as much money as I did > when I worked. Again it is No Luxury! > I know the person who said it was a luxury did not mean it, they were > only fustrated, but to think someone else might consider it a luxury, > angers me. > Sherry, I did not see the post about SS benefits being a luxury but if the size of these checks I get each month anyone thinks are " luxrious " , then I think they can eat their hat!!! It helps supplement what my husband is earning now but it IS NOT close to what I earned at my last job! Of course, we did work overtime at the end of each month which meant time and a half and we got quarterly bonuses based on a variety of aspects; so this check is possibly 1/3 of what I was earning while working! And for some reason, it was one job where I seldom ever missed a day of work --- but many of my co- workers could tell from just looking at me that I was in pain! I, was however, very fortunate in that I had a manager and a director who treated those of us who actually did our jobs with some respect. I did feel really bad when the one poor lady, who was in constant pained, worked more overtime than many others in her area but they did not have a decent boss! He was merely a supervisor and after a meeting with another employee and the section's manager, the two guys asked her to stay as the supervisor had something to say!!! I don't remember all of the conversation but he finally just flat out said " I don't even like to look at your face!!! " I happened to be off the floor when this all took place so I didn't know until later what had happened. But I did get her phone number and she was so upset --- unfortunately, since the manager kept his blank blank mouth shut during that tirade, she really had no way to prove what he said so she couldn't easily file a descrimination suit against the company and the supervisor and it took her well over a year to finally get her disability. I don't know how she would have managed to live had she not moved in with her daughter and helped with babysitting her grandchild. So, no, it is definitely NOT A LUXURY!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 Just want those who have not and I hope never need to apply for Social > Security Disability...it is NOT a luzury. The process of getting Social > Security benefits can be lengthy and exhausting as they have been and > continue to be for me. I am trying to attain benefits that are > rightfully mine. I have worked since the age of 16 and stopped working > when I was 44. I think I paid into it!? I did not choose to become > disabled, but I choose to fight for what I believe I deserve. And I > find no luxury in that, or the fact that if Social Security approves > me, whenever that might be, I will never receive as much money as I did > when I worked. Again it is No Luxury! > I know the person who said it was a luxury did not mean it, they were > only fustrated, but to think someone else might consider it a luxury, > angers me. > > I have another beef about people who receive other kinds money from the govenerment, and I apolize before hand if I offend anyone here; but my husband waited very patiently in a Super Walmart for me while I used the photo system to copy some old photos. Because of where he was sitting, he watched a number of people check out and was really very angry as he watched people using their food cards to check out. Between us, we can live pretty comfortably, but what angered him was watching what all so many people were purchasing. Since he does most of our grocery shopping these days, he knows how easy it is to spend $50 dollars or so perhaps once or twice a week on just the basics it is for the two of us and what he wondered just what those government cards are worth that those individuals were using. And I won't say that it is more prevalent in this state than others, > > > > > --------------------------------- > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.