Re: OT: root-canal problems

[Guest guest]

>Well, after a whole book talking about the dangers of root

> canals, there was one option, Biocalex, or Endocalex, which is the

>new name.

> It is used extensively in Europe and has been for a long time. It

>expands, filling the tubules and hardens. __

This is a misconception and frank untruth that some dentists use to market this

technique. The dentine tubules can never be filled by ANY material, only the

main branches can and not always properly leaving space for infection. The

dentine tubules can't even be sterilised properly. There is no way even if you

take the tooth out the mouth and soak it in bleach.

The dentine tubules are too small to fill, too small for your immune cells to

get into (White Blood Cells), but just large enough for bacteria to use as a

little fortress whilst they feed on your nutrients and release their toxins into

your system.

I'm not saying that Endocalex is necessarily bad and may have its applications,

but some of the claims are simply false.

I have never had a Endocalex root canal and can't talk from experience there.

But I have had a 'normal' root canal, and given the option I would chose amalgam

fillings rather in all seriousness. The root canal's effect on my was so

wide-ranging and so devastating I now consider them as pure evil. Granted they

don't affect everyone the same, but neither does mercury. Both are silent

torturers and often killers.

Dean