Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I cannot seem to get an answer on this, and can't find anyting in Andys' books. Once you have begun chelation and done another hair test..are the result indicative of what's being excreted as a result of the chelation? My son's hair test after 18 rounds was still pretty toxic and finally clearly met counting rules instead of almost. All his metals were lower than the original test except antimony which was higher. We are trying to figure out if the metals represented in this second hair test are what is being excreted due to chelation. I appreciate anyone that knows someting on this..easing our minds..that this increase in antimony is likely because we are pulling it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 When mineral transport is deranged, it is hard to interpret the level. More can come out in hair because there is more stirred up and available to come out. Also, mercury can be doing its usual thing of messing up mineral transport and thus pushing more into hair. I think your main concern is whether it is current exposure. If it is somewhat higher, it is nothing to worry about. If it is vastly higher (went from green to red), it is worth thinking about, but it would require a lot of exposure to cause a significant elevation of a toxic in hair. You'd probably be looking for a frequent or daily source. Stay aware of aources, and avoid them. You're probably fine. -- > > I cannot seem to get an answer on this, and can't find anyting in > Andys' books. > Once you have begun chelation and done another hair test..are the > result indicative of what's being excreted as a result of the > chelation? > > My son's hair test after 18 rounds was still pretty toxic and finally > clearly met counting rules instead of almost. All his metals were > lower than the original test except antimony which was higher. We are > trying to figure out if the metals represented in this second hair > test are what is being excreted due to chelation. > > I appreciate anyone that knows someting on this..easing our > minds..that this increase in antimony is likely because we are pulling > it out. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 > > I cannot seem to get an answer on this, and can't find anyting in > Andys' books. > Once you have begun chelation and done another hair test..are the > result indicative of what's being excreted as a result of the > chelation? No. They are irrelevant. > My son's hair test after 18 rounds was still pretty toxic and finally > clearly met counting rules instead of almost. All his metals were > lower than the original test except antimony which was higher. We are > trying to figure out if the metals represented in this second hair > test are what is being excreted due to chelation. > > I appreciate anyone that knows someting on this..easing our > minds..that this increase in antimony is likely because we are pulling > it out. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 Whew! Thanks Andy and . It is only a bit higher, Antimony was already in the high red originally, and it just a bit higher than that now. Deranged minerals transport is clearly evident now, so we will just continue to avoid exposures and chelate. > > > > I cannot seem to get an answer on this, and can't find anyting in > > Andys' books. > > Once you have begun chelation and done another hair test..are the > > result indicative of what's being excreted as a result of the > > chelation? > > > > My son's hair test after 18 rounds was still pretty toxic and finally > > clearly met counting rules instead of almost. All his metals were > > lower than the original test except antimony which was higher. We are > > trying to figure out if the metals represented in this second hair > > test are what is being excreted due to chelation. > > > > I appreciate anyone that knows someting on this..easing our > > minds..that this increase in antimony is likely because we are pulling > > it out. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.