Guest guest Posted January 11, 2010 Report Share Posted January 11, 2010 http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/news/2010/01/cleveland_ems_rejects_minor_c\ alls_to_save_money.html > The days of Cleveland paramedics hauling people to the hospital for minor ailments > such as hemorrhoids and headaches are over. I guess that means the City of Cleveland found the money for CAT scans on their ambulances. Good for them. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2010 Report Share Posted January 11, 2010 There is mirth and rejoicing in the Plaintiff's bar today. And the insurance defense lawyers are celebrating as well. What a great New Year's gift! Porsche, Mercedes, BMW, Farrari, and Maserati salesmen are already planning their Dubai vacations. The ghost of Nurse Myrick LIVES! GG On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:50:24 PM, " rob.davis@... " rob.davis@...> wrote: Subject: RE: Cleveland (Ohio) EMS to start refusing calls? Date: January 11, 2010 2:50:24 PM MST To: texasems-l http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/news/2010/01/cleveland_ems_rejects_minor_c\ alls_to_save_money.html > The days of Cleveland paramedics hauling people to the hospital for minor ailments > such as hemorrhoids and headaches are over. I guess that means the City of Cleveland found the money for CAT scans on their ambulances. Good for them. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2010 Report Share Posted January 11, 2010 LOL! > There is mirth and rejoicing in the Plaintiff's bar today. And the > insurance defense lawyers are celebrating as well. What a great New Year's > gift! Porsche, Mercedes, BMW, Farrari, and Maserati salesmen are already > planning their Dubai vacations. The ghost of Nurse Myrick LIVES! > > GG > On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:50:24 PM, " rob.davis@... " < > rob.davis@...> wrote: > > > Subject: RE: Cleveland (Ohio) EMS to start refusing calls? > Date: January 11, 2010 2:50:24 PM MST > To: texasems-l > > http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/news/2010/01/cleveland_ems_rejects_minor_c\ alls_to_save_money.html > > > The days of Cleveland paramedics hauling people to the hospital for minor > ailments > > such as hemorrhoids and headaches are over. > > I guess that means the City of Cleveland found the money for CAT scans on > their ambulances. Good for them. > > Rob > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2010 Report Share Posted January 11, 2010 There may or may not be a place for paramedic initiated refusals once the EMS person is at the patient's side...that is a protocol and medical direction issue. But, the likelihood of not sending anyone at all being viable, is very low. I have sat through a couple of presentations by folks who are using paramedic and nursing telephonic triage to advise rather or not to send an ambulance, and by their own admission, the call volume reduction was not near as large as they anticipated. In contrast, they achieved significant call reduction by interacting with frequent callers outside of an acute event with psychological, social and public health services that solved these peoples issues so that they didn't call so they didn't have to NOT send someone (how is that for a bad sentence). In other words, by preventing the call by addressing social and health issues we don't have to worry about the liabilty of not sending anyone or not transporting someone who wants transported. Dudley Cleveland (Ohio) EMS to start refusing calls? http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/news/2010/01/cleveland_ems_rejects_minor_c\ alls_to_save_money.html Thoughts? -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, Lic.P./NREMT-P -Austin, Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2010 Report Share Posted January 11, 2010 On Monday, January 11, 2010 21:41, THEDUDMAN@... said: > > There may or may not be a place for paramedic initiated refusals once the EMS > person is at the patient's side...that is a protocol and medical direction issue. > But, the likelihood of not sending anyone at all being viable, is very low. Most physicians won't even practise " phone medicine " for this very reason. What makes someone so delusional as to believe that an EMS calltaker can competently do it is beyond me. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 I have not followed this thread very much so if I am repeating what was said before forgive me please. But I can see the reason behind the cities move.. Money, as we all can. However, i do have to question the wisdom of it. I do not kow any medics from there but I do like to think that they are well trained and know what they are doing. But we all know that when we are tired and simply want to go home our decision making skills can be deminished and the wrong choice made. I hope this nevr happens but give time it will. They are, after all human. none of us are in Clevland and we were not part of the decision making process, so let us take a wait and see look and see how the new system works. I think that if the medics make sound logical choices then the new system will work, but once agian there is the human factor and that, in the end, will be the desiding factor here as in everywhere. Lawrence Verrett EMT-P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.