Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: ALA before amalgam removal - non-excretor

Rate this topic

Guest guest

By Guest guest
in Health, Medicine and Natural Healing 07

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Guest guest

Posted
Posted

It is possible that ALA by itself would increase fecal

excretion but not urinary excretion. I might also be

a " non-excretor " for whatever reason. And I still had

amalgams in. All I know is that I didn't pass any

mercury with ALA and chlorella alone, but passed some

mercury the same day after an EDTA challenge (I didn't

know this was not advisable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Guest guest

Posted
Posted

It is possible that ALA by itself would increase fecal

excretion but not urinary excretion. I might also be

a " non-excretor " for whatever reason. And I still had

amalgams in. All I know is that I didn't pass any

mercury with ALA and chlorella alone, but passed some

mercury the same day after an EDTA challenge (I didn't

know this was not advisable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Guest guest

Posted
Posted

" It is possible that ALA by itself would increase fecal

excretion but not urinary excretion. "

I am pretty sure this is what AI says- ALA exits mercury through bowels, DMSA

through urine.

-Olif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...