Guest guest Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 This is my son's second hair test following 19 rounds with dmsa/ala on Andy's protocol over the past year. This test was done one year to the month of his original test. His original was very toxic, the levels actually higher than this test. He had six to the right on his first test. Very elevated antimony, aluminum, arsenic, lead, silver, and tin. His zinc was low in the red. The only toxic metal that is higher than last year is antimony. All the others went down. We have no known new exposures. As I understand it, this would be a representation of what he is excreting. Probably due to chelation, not actual new exposures? What are your opinions, interpretations. I want to be sure I have not overlooked anything. You can email me. April 26, 2007 Toxic Elements: Result Ref range Color Aluminum 6.3 <8.0 green Antimony 0.46 <0.066 almost end of red Arsenic 0.20 <0.080 almost end of yellow Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no bar Bismuth 0.042 <2.0 tiny green bar Cadmium 0.093 <0.15 green Lead 3.0 <1.0 mid yellow, this was 5.0 last yr. Mercury <0.03 <0.40 no bar Platinum <0.003 <0.005 no bar thallium <0.001 <0.010 no bar Thorium <0.001 <0.005 no bar Uranium 0.009 <0.060 low green Nickel 0.14 <0.40 low green Silver 0.35 <0.20 low yellow Tin 0.68 <0.30 mid yellow Titanium 0.66 <1.0 mid green Total Toxic Rep: mid red(above 95th) Essential and Other Elements: Element REsult Ref Range Color Over/Under Calcium 140 125-370 green under Magnesium 6 12-30 touches red under Sodium 76 12-90 green over Potassium 54 12-40 yellow over Copper 7.2 8.0-16 yellow under zinc 58 100-190 red under Manganese 0.15 0.20-0.55 yellow under Chromium 0.35 0.26-0.50 white middle white band Vanadium 0.040 0.030-0.10 green under Molybdenum 0.12 0.050-0.13 green over Boron 5.5 0.60-4.0 yellow over Iodine 1.6 0.25-1.3 touches yellow over Lithium 0.010 0.007-0.023 white middle white band PHosphorus 200 160-250 white middle white band Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green under strontium 0.12 0.16-1.0 yellow under Sulfur 48900 45500-53000 green over Barium 0.19 0.16-0.80 green under Cobalt 0.007 0.013-0.035 ouches red under Iron 12 8.0-19 white middle white band Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow under Rubidium 0.072 0.016-0.18 green over Zirconium 0.50 0.040-1.0 green over Ratios: results range Ca/Mg 23.3 4-30 Ca/P 0.7 0.8-8 Na/K 1.41 0.5-10 Zn/Cu 8.06 4-20 Zn/Cd 624 >800 Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2007 Report Share Posted May 23, 2007 Is there anyone that could check this test for me? I would appreciate it. > > This is my son's second hair test following 19 rounds with dmsa/ala > on Andy's protocol over the past year. This test was done one year > to the month of his original test. His original was very toxic, the > levels actually higher than this test. He had six to the right on > his first test. Very elevated antimony, aluminum, arsenic, lead, > silver, and tin. His zinc was low in the red. The only toxic metal > that is higher than last year is antimony. All the others went down. > We have no known new exposures. As I understand it, this would be a > representation of what he is excreting. Probably due to chelation, > not actual new exposures? What are your opinions, interpretations. > I want to be sure I have not overlooked anything. You can email me. > > April 26, 2007 > > Toxic Elements: Result Ref range Color > Aluminum 6.3 <8.0 green > Antimony 0.46 <0.066 almost end of red > Arsenic 0.20 <0.080 almost end of yellow > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no bar > Bismuth 0.042 <2.0 tiny green bar > Cadmium 0.093 <0.15 green > Lead 3.0 <1.0 mid yellow, this was 5.0 last yr. > Mercury <0.03 <0.40 no bar > Platinum <0.003 <0.005 no bar > thallium <0.001 <0.010 no bar > Thorium <0.001 <0.005 no bar > Uranium 0.009 <0.060 low green > Nickel 0.14 <0.40 low green > Silver 0.35 <0.20 low yellow > Tin 0.68 <0.30 mid yellow > Titanium 0.66 <1.0 mid green > Total Toxic Rep: mid red(above 95th) > > Essential and Other Elements: > Element REsult Ref Range Color Over/Under > Calcium 140 125-370 green under > Magnesium 6 12-30 touches red under > Sodium 76 12-90 green over > Potassium 54 12-40 yellow over > Copper 7.2 8.0-16 yellow under > zinc 58 100-190 red under > Manganese 0.15 0.20-0.55 yellow under > Chromium 0.35 0.26-0.50 white middle white band > Vanadium 0.040 0.030-0.10 green under > Molybdenum 0.12 0.050-0.13 green over > Boron 5.5 0.60-4.0 yellow over > Iodine 1.6 0.25-1.3 touches yellow over > Lithium 0.010 0.007-0.023 white middle white band > PHosphorus 200 160-250 white middle white band > Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green under > strontium 0.12 0.16-1.0 yellow under > Sulfur 48900 45500-53000 green over > Barium 0.19 0.16-0.80 green under > Cobalt 0.007 0.013-0.035 ouches red under > Iron 12 8.0-19 white middle white band > Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow under > Rubidium 0.072 0.016-0.18 green over > Zirconium 0.50 0.040-1.0 green over > > Ratios: results range > Ca/Mg 23.3 4-30 > Ca/P 0.7 0.8-8 > Na/K 1.41 0.5-10 > Zn/Cu 8.06 4-20 > Zn/Cd 624 >800 > > Thanks! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2007 Report Share Posted May 23, 2007 Obviously not a normal test. If you can chelate more often, that seems like a good idea. (Or are you doing long rounds?) As Andy would say, you need to chelate, chelate, chelate, and chelate some more. Make sure you are giving enough zinc and magnesium. Taurine will help him retain the magnesium. Can be calming too. Don't give tyrosine or phenylalanine. Increase in antimony could be a normal variation in hair excretion as you chelate. Would be good to check for sources of exposure, just to be sure. PET plastic water bottles. Water pipe solder. Not a classic adrenal sign, but if symptoms indicate, I'd give adrenal cortex extract or try some licorice. -- > > > > This is my son's second hair test following 19 rounds with > dmsa/ala > > on Andy's protocol over the past year. This test was done one year > > to the month of his original test. His original was very toxic, > the > > levels actually higher than this test. He had six to the right on > > his first test. Very elevated antimony, aluminum, arsenic, lead, > > silver, and tin. His zinc was low in the red. The only toxic metal > > that is higher than last year is antimony. All the others went > down. > > We have no known new exposures. As I understand it, this would be > a > > representation of what he is excreting. Probably due to chelation, > > not actual new exposures? What are your opinions, > interpretations. > > I want to be sure I have not overlooked anything. You can email me. > > > > April 26, 2007 > > > > Toxic Elements: Result Ref range Color > > Aluminum 6.3 <8.0 green > > Antimony 0.46 <0.066 almost end of red > > Arsenic 0.20 <0.080 almost end of yellow > > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no bar > > Bismuth 0.042 <2.0 tiny green bar > > Cadmium 0.093 <0.15 green > > Lead 3.0 <1.0 mid yellow, this was 5.0 last > yr. > > Mercury <0.03 <0.40 no bar > > Platinum <0.003 <0.005 no bar > > thallium <0.001 <0.010 no bar > > Thorium <0.001 <0.005 no bar > > Uranium 0.009 <0.060 low green > > Nickel 0.14 <0.40 low green > > Silver 0.35 <0.20 low yellow > > Tin 0.68 <0.30 mid yellow > > Titanium 0.66 <1.0 mid green > > Total Toxic Rep: mid red(above 95th) > > > > Essential and Other Elements: > > Element REsult Ref Range Color Over/Under > > Calcium 140 125-370 green under > > Magnesium 6 12-30 touches red under > > Sodium 76 12-90 green over > > Potassium 54 12-40 yellow over > > Copper 7.2 8.0-16 yellow under > > zinc 58 100-190 red under > > Manganese 0.15 0.20-0.55 yellow under > > Chromium 0.35 0.26-0.50 white middle white band > > Vanadium 0.040 0.030-0.10 green under > > Molybdenum 0.12 0.050-0.13 green over > > Boron 5.5 0.60-4.0 yellow over > > Iodine 1.6 0.25-1.3 touches yellow over > > Lithium 0.010 0.007-0.023 white middle white band > > PHosphorus 200 160-250 white middle white band > > Selenium 0.94 0.95-1.7 green under > > strontium 0.12 0.16-1.0 yellow under > > Sulfur 48900 45500-53000 green over > > Barium 0.19 0.16-0.80 green under > > Cobalt 0.007 0.013-0.035 ouches red under > > Iron 12 8.0-19 white middle white band > > Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow under > > Rubidium 0.072 0.016-0.18 green over > > Zirconium 0.50 0.040-1.0 green over > > > > Ratios: results range > > Ca/Mg 23.3 4-30 > > Ca/P 0.7 0.8-8 > > Na/K 1.41 0.5-10 > > Zn/Cu 8.06 4-20 > > Zn/Cd 624 >800 > > > > Thanks! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2007 Report Share Posted May 26, 2007 Thank you . He does exhibit signs of adrenal issues. We found that out when he got sick and could not take his adrenal cortex for three days! We were chelating less frequently due to the Lead. To allow for bone leaching of Lead. At first we did every week, and then every other, and then every third. We are now once a month. But I think when school lets out we will do every week. He is on 50mg of zinc a day, and 200-300 mg of mag a day. Plus everything else Andy's lists. We have not done long rounds. It it too much on us, but if it will help more, I would try it. We will add taurine! We will try to find some kind of other water bottle. We do use the clear hard plastics but still....can't take chances. -- In frequent-dose-chelation , " " wrote: > > Obviously not a normal test. If you can chelate more often, that > seems like a good idea. (Or are you doing long rounds?) > > As Andy would say, you need to chelate, chelate, chelate, and > chelate some more. > > Make sure you are giving enough zinc and magnesium. Taurine will > help him retain the magnesium. Can be calming too. > > Don't give tyrosine or phenylalanine. > > Increase in antimony could be a normal variation in hair excretion > as you chelate. Would be good to check for sources of exposure, > just to be sure. PET plastic water bottles. Water pipe solder. > > Not a classic adrenal sign, but if symptoms indicate, I'd give > adrenal cortex extract or try some licorice. > > -- > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone that could check this test for me? I would > > appreciate it. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 > > > > > > Is there anyone that could check this test for me? I would > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 > > > > > > Is there anyone that could check this test for me? I would > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 > > > > > > Is there anyone that could check this test for me? I would > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 Oh yeah, I forgot to ask, since this test was done after the process of chelation began, the metals we see are excretion mainly from chelation. Not new exposures, is this correct?? When I posted this on MA I was told to look for new exposures. However, there aren't any. My deduction from Andy's readings and other research was that what is showing up is what is being excreted, likely from chelation. We are always cautious for new exposures anyway. And this child's exposures are no way near what they used to be. > > > > > > Is there anyone that could check this test for me? I would > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 Oh yeah, I forgot to ask, since this test was done after the process of chelation began, the metals we see are excretion mainly from chelation. Not new exposures, is this correct?? When I posted this on MA I was told to look for new exposures. However, there aren't any. My deduction from Andy's readings and other research was that what is showing up is what is being excreted, likely from chelation. We are always cautious for new exposures anyway. And this child's exposures are no way near what they used to be. > > > > > > Is there anyone that could check this test for me? I would > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.