Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Local ORs are very reluctant to allow any EMT-P students into the operating rooms because of legal liability to the hospitals and doctors. When I was instructing for an EMT-P program at a community college, we had a difficult time finding hospitals that would allow our students to come in and intubate. B. mood Marketing and Business Development Manager AEMSTAR EMS 13003 Road Suite F-1 Stafford, Texas 77477 Office: Cell: Fax: E-mail: mlindamood@... From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of spenair Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:28 PM To: texasems-l Subject: JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by Bledsoe and Gandy Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and research cited. http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_en dotracheal_tube.html Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success rates thus improving patient outcomes. I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. Well congrats on a good article. Renny Spencer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Local ORs are very reluctant to allow any EMT-P students into the operating rooms because of legal liability to the hospitals and doctors. When I was instructing for an EMT-P program at a community college, we had a difficult time finding hospitals that would allow our students to come in and intubate. B. mood Marketing and Business Development Manager AEMSTAR EMS 13003 Road Suite F-1 Stafford, Texas 77477 Office: Cell: Fax: E-mail: mlindamood@... From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of spenair Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:28 PM To: texasems-l Subject: JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by Bledsoe and Gandy Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and research cited. http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_en dotracheal_tube.html Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success rates thus improving patient outcomes. I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. Well congrats on a good article. Renny Spencer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 And this isn't a new problem. Even back in the 1980s when I taught for a university program, we had a hard time getting students into ORs. mood wrote: > Local ORs are very reluctant to allow any EMT-P students into the operating > rooms because of legal liability to the hospitals and doctors. > > When I was instructing for an EMT-P program at a community college, we had a > difficult time finding hospitals that would allow our students to come in > and intubate. > > > > B. mood > > Marketing and Business Development Manager > > AEMSTAR EMS > > 13003 Road Suite F-1 > > Stafford, Texas 77477 > > Office: > > Cell: > > Fax: > > E-mail: mlindamood@... > > > > > From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On > Behalf Of spenair > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:28 PM > To: texasems-l > Subject: JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by > Bledsoe and Gandy > > > > Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and > research cited. > > http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_en > dotracheal_tube.html > > Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have > it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out > clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple > intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success > rates thus improving patient outcomes. > > I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. > > Well congrats on a good article. > > Renny Spencer > > > -- Steve LP RIT AlertCPR Emergency Training Center 1400 Moccassin Trl, Suite 12 ville, TX 75077 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 And this isn't a new problem. Even back in the 1980s when I taught for a university program, we had a hard time getting students into ORs. mood wrote: > Local ORs are very reluctant to allow any EMT-P students into the operating > rooms because of legal liability to the hospitals and doctors. > > When I was instructing for an EMT-P program at a community college, we had a > difficult time finding hospitals that would allow our students to come in > and intubate. > > > > B. mood > > Marketing and Business Development Manager > > AEMSTAR EMS > > 13003 Road Suite F-1 > > Stafford, Texas 77477 > > Office: > > Cell: > > Fax: > > E-mail: mlindamood@... > > > > > From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On > Behalf Of spenair > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:28 PM > To: texasems-l > Subject: JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by > Bledsoe and Gandy > > > > Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and > research cited. > > http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_en > dotracheal_tube.html > > Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have > it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out > clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple > intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success > rates thus improving patient outcomes. > > I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. > > Well congrats on a good article. > > Renny Spencer > > > -- Steve LP RIT AlertCPR Emergency Training Center 1400 Moccassin Trl, Suite 12 ville, TX 75077 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 On Tuesday, March 10, 2009 15:05, " Steve " paramedic1@...> said: > And this isn't a new problem. Even back in the 1980s when I taught for > a university program, we had a hard time getting students into ORs. The problem has compounded significantly with so many surgeries being done with only an LMA. Even if you have a cooperative hospital and staff, the opportunities for ETI have drastically decreased. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 On Tuesday, March 10, 2009 15:05, " Steve " paramedic1@...> said: > And this isn't a new problem. Even back in the 1980s when I taught for > a university program, we had a hard time getting students into ORs. The problem has compounded significantly with so many surgeries being done with only an LMA. Even if you have a cooperative hospital and staff, the opportunities for ETI have drastically decreased. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I find the research and the article both informative and probably correct. While there is no bandwagon of protest from this end, there is the fact that most of the numbers do not correspond with the numbers in my department. I feel that because of this and the positive outcomes of our patients, there is no reason for my department to quit doing it. My main concern is that it is somehow taken out of my hands by legislature or general consensus. I hope that is not the case anytime soon. I have a very responsible belief that there are many services that should not be attempting this procedure. Mine is not one of them. I see a growing number of missed ETI's in the field that are not even noticed prior to arriving at the hospital. This scares me greatly. Without having to rewrite the world of paramedics, I hope there is still some consideration for those that do save lives while using it. Andy Foote JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by Bledsoe and Gandy Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and research cited. http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_endotr\ acheal_tube.html Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success rates thus improving patient outcomes. I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. Well congrats on a good article. Renny Spencer ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I find the research and the article both informative and probably correct. While there is no bandwagon of protest from this end, there is the fact that most of the numbers do not correspond with the numbers in my department. I feel that because of this and the positive outcomes of our patients, there is no reason for my department to quit doing it. My main concern is that it is somehow taken out of my hands by legislature or general consensus. I hope that is not the case anytime soon. I have a very responsible belief that there are many services that should not be attempting this procedure. Mine is not one of them. I see a growing number of missed ETI's in the field that are not even noticed prior to arriving at the hospital. This scares me greatly. Without having to rewrite the world of paramedics, I hope there is still some consideration for those that do save lives while using it. Andy Foote JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by Bledsoe and Gandy Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and research cited. http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_endotr\ acheal_tube.html Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success rates thus improving patient outcomes. I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. Well congrats on a good article. Renny Spencer ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I find the research and the article both informative and probably correct. While there is no bandwagon of protest from this end, there is the fact that most of the numbers do not correspond with the numbers in my department. I feel that because of this and the positive outcomes of our patients, there is no reason for my department to quit doing it. My main concern is that it is somehow taken out of my hands by legislature or general consensus. I hope that is not the case anytime soon. I have a very responsible belief that there are many services that should not be attempting this procedure. Mine is not one of them. I see a growing number of missed ETI's in the field that are not even noticed prior to arriving at the hospital. This scares me greatly. Without having to rewrite the world of paramedics, I hope there is still some consideration for those that do save lives while using it. Andy Foote JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by Bledsoe and Gandy Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and research cited. http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_endotr\ acheal_tube.html Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success rates thus improving patient outcomes. I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. Well congrats on a good article. Renny Spencer ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 We are a fire based 911 provider running MICUs. We have been following the issues regarding intubation and RSI in the field and if paramedics should be the ones doing these skills. As with all EMS providers are our medics getting enough training and how are we able to insure their competency with airway management. It is not only if they can or cannot intubate but if they recognize when, how to manage the airway, manage the airway, and properly ventilate the patient and recognize when they are not, etc. We have established with our local hospital the ability to have all of our medics go thru a rotation with an anesthesiologist starting from basic airway management up to intubation and proper ventilation of the patient. Each medics is assigned to the anesthesiologist for two 4 hour rotations in the OR and the medics skills are checked off by the anesthesiologist. The medics are assigned the OR rotation at the start of their shift and report directly to the hospital. We also have our EMS skills and education other than the OR rotation. The OR rotations allows our medics to work with real patients in a controlled environment with a proper trained physician specializing in airway management. It is at least a good start and a great opportunity for our department. To: texasems-l > Date: 03/10/2009 15:04 Subject: RE: JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by Bledsoe and Gandy Sent by: texasems-l Local ORs are very reluctant to allow any EMT-P students into the operating rooms because of legal liability to the hospitals and doctors. When I was instructing for an EMT-P program at a community college, we had a difficult time finding hospitals that would allow our students to come in and intubate. B. mood Marketing and Business Development Manager AEMSTAR EMS 13003 Road Suite F-1 Stafford, Texas 77477 Office: Cell: Fax: E-mail: mlindamood@... From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of spenair Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:28 PM To: texasems-l Subject: JEMS -The Disappearing Endotracheal Tube article by Bledsoe and Gandy Very good article by members of this group. I enjoyed the information and research cited. http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/articles/jems/3403/the_disappearing_en dotracheal_tube.html Now I do disagree with removing this skill. I would say its better to have it available, but increase the education levels. A service could work out clinical opportunitys with the local OR to allow Paramedics to do multiple intubations each quarter. This should erase the problems with the success rates thus improving patient outcomes. I do agree though that more focus needs to be placed on proper ventilation. Well congrats on a good article. Renny Spencer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.