Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 It's all about the money!! For what it's worth the list of doctors who are changing things is growing. I used to use a lot of Nutrasweet. At one point I started getting small tremors in my left foot. This was about the same time that I had had it with my other doctors and the thyroid problems and other symptoms I was having and switched to the doctor I am using now. She told me to immediately stop using Nutrasweet and gave me info on the problems associated with it, including a lot of people coming down with MS symptoms from it's use. I became very concerned after doing research on the subject as my daughter's endo was pushing sugar free substitutes for my daughter's use across the board for her Type 1 diabetes. They even hand out tons of samples of sugar free goodies at their office to the kids. We found that her BG is affected even worse with Nutrasweet than it is with regular sugar. It whacks it out for long periods. I think it is a war and we as consumers need to educate ourselves, and start or continue to speak out. One of the problems, though, is that it usually takes losing one's health to figure out what's going on. Or spend a few months in a hospital setting and you'll quickly figure out that our medical system is in deep trouble. I'm not sure how one can watch TV anymore, with all the big pharma commercials trolling for patients and not figure out what's going on. It's this blind trust that the majority seems to have. We need to speak out just as many have done with their thyroid issues. Here's an excerpt with some good info on Nutrasweet, again from Dr. O'Shea with lots of good references. There is a ton of info and evidence out there, that has been purposely kept from the public. The full chapter can be found at: http://thedoctorwithin.com/index_fr.php?page=articles/sugar_theif_life.php Linn When the FDA approved [aspartame] for human consumption in 1974, it went against a body of evidence so enormous as to stagger the credulity of virtually any thinking person. " What most consumers don't know, " says Mike Wallace of CBS's " 60 Minutes, " " is that aspartame's approval was one of the most contested in FDA history. Consumers have reported more than 7,000 adverse reactions to the FDA, ranging from dizziness to headaches to seizures. " How could such a toxin get approved for mass consumption? Consider this: aspartame was OK'd during the Reagan Era. Ronnie's appointee as FDA Commissioner was Arthur Hull Hays. A few months after approving aspartame, Hays left the FDA. Take a wild guess what his next job was. A top position as consultant for Monsanto's PR office! Ain't that America/ for you and me From the very beginning, researchers had problems with aspartame's effects on the body, especially on the nervous system. A more complete list of aspartame's side effects is found in a Feb. 1994 report from the Department of Health and Human Services: nausea numbness muscle spasms weight gain {!} rashes depression fatigue excitability rapid heartbeat insomnia vision problems hearing loss anxiety attacks slurred speech loss of taste ringing in the ears vertigo memory loss arthritis Other researchers found that aspartame could cause brain tumors multiple sclerosis epilepsy chronic fatigue Parkinson's disease Alzheimer's mental retardation lymphoma birth defects fibromyalgia diabetes {!} -------- Blaylock Read these two lists again. This is what people really get when they think they're getting what? A " diet " drink that will let them lose weight and still enjoy soft drinks? And it still causes diabetes and weight gain? Looks like some more masterful marketing, the type that sells vaccines and heart medication and fake insulin and pain killers. And the beauty of it is that the drug companies will get money both ways - -when people drink the diet soft drinks -when people then get all these diseases, which require more drugs. Aspartame is a triple molecule composed of aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol (wood alcohol). Blaylock, a professor of neurophysiology, is the real expert on aspartic acid. In his book, Excitotoxins: The Taste that Kills, Dr. Blaylock reminds us that MSG is 99% aspartic acid. Aspartic acid is a major neurotoxin which can cause virtually any neurological disorder you can think of. (See above list) It does this by producing free radicals that kill nerve cells. Blaylock has over 500 scientific references to back up this notion of nerve damage from aspartic acid. A chemical that kills nerve cells may mimic several neurological diseases. One is Multiple Sclerosis. With true MS, the insulation around nerves - the myelin - is being slowly destroyed, for some unknown reason. This shorts out the affected parts of the nervous system. The result is a wide range of possible symptoms - numbness, pain, confusion, headache, blindness, organ breakdown, etc. But aspartame may cause the identical presentation, and be misdiagnosed as MS. This would render any treatment for the MS useless, obviously. The point is, if someone has been diagnosed with MS, or with any other incurable nerve disorder, and they're drinking diet soft drinks on a daily basis, the physicians may be barking up the wrong tree. And the patient will continue to poison himself, maybe to death. (http://www.cybernaute.com/earthconcert2000/Aspartame.htm) Aspartic acid is very dangerous to infants, whose nervous systems are still forming and have not developed a defense system as yet. Very similar to what we saw with DPT shots (Sanctity of Human Blood) It may not be wise to give your infant diet anything. Phenylalanine is an amino acid necessary for brain function. In excess, phenylalanine lowers serotonin levels, causing depression. (Elsas) Methanol is wood alcohol. In the 1920s when liquor was illegal, people would sometimes resort to wood alcohol, even though the dangers of blindness from doing so were well known. Methanol is a by-product of aspartame after aspartame breaks down in the small intestine, from the action of our enzyme chymotrypsin. An additional problem with methanol is that it is then changed into formaldehyde in the body. As we saw in Sanctity of Human Blood, formaldehyde is a well-known neurotoxin and carcinogen, documented in every toxicology and pathology text ever written. Researchers found out that digestion is not even necessary to break aspartame down into these three toxins. If the diet soda sits around in a room where temperature goes above 86 degrees F, formaldehyde is produced. (Moser, p 42) Other researchers have correlated the neurotoxic components of Gulf War Syndrome with the boatloads of diet soda that sat around in the desert sun for weeks, at temperatures above 100 degrees F. But such a thing happens every day in America in warmer climates. Soda delivery trucks aren't refrigerated. Toxicity levels? The EPA has giving methanol as consumption limit of 7.8 mg per day. Problem is, a one liter bottle of diet soda contains 56 mg of potential methanol! (Monte) How could something this toxic be approved by the FDA? That's simple. The demand. By 1986, Americans were drinking 20 billion cans of diet soda per year, all of it with aspartame. (Metzenbaum) In 1987, Monsanto sold 8,500 TONS of aspartame, according to USDA figures. After that year, they refused to release production figures. But it's unlikely that production has gone down since then, considering all the foods that now feature aspartame. A partial list: diet soft drinks breakfast cereals puddings malt beverages pie fillings candy tea fruit juice concentrates baked goods frostings breath mints chewing gum coffee wine coolers yogurt ------- Gold, p 9, 10 Then Monsanto found the real motherlode - chewable vitamins. Here is a partial list of the drugs and vitamins which now are flavored by the proven neurotoxin aspartame: - Mylanta Natural Fiber Supplement, Sugar Free. - Centrum,Jr vitamins - Childrens TYLENOL acetaminophen Fruit Flavored Chewable Tablets - Childrens TYLENOL acetaminophen Grape Flavored Chewable Tablets - Childrens TYLENOL acetaminophen Cold Multi-Symptom Chewable Tablets - Junior Strength TYLENOL acetaminophen Fruit Flavored Chewable Tablets - PEDIACARE Cold-Allergy Tablets for Ages 6 to 12 - PEDIACARE Cough-Cold Tablets for Ages 6 to 12 - PEDICARE Childrens Cold Relief Tablets - TYLENOL Cold and Flu Hot Medication - TYLENOL Cold and Flu No Drowsiness Formula Hot Medication - Childrens Chewable CO-TYLENOLv - ALKA-SELTZER PLUS Night-time Cold Medicine - ALKA-SELTZER PLUS Cold and Cough Medicine - ALKA-SELTZER PLUS Sinus Allergy Medicine - BUGS BUNNY Vitamin Products (ALL) - FLINTSTONES Plus Calcium Multivitamin Supplement - FLINTSTONES Complete Multivitamin Supplement - FLINTSTONES Childrens Chewable Multivitamin - DIMETAPP Cold and Allergy Chewable Tablets - TEMPRA 3 Chewable Tablets, 80mg acetaminophen tablet - TEMPRA 3 Double Strength Chewable Tablets, 160mg acetominophen - Zantac Efferdose - SKAGGS ALPHA BETA Childrens Pain Reliever - SHOP'N SAVE Childrens Non-Aspirin Pain Reliever - KINNEY " S Childrens Chewable Non-Aspirin Pain Reliever - PAY'N SAVE Childrens Chewable Non-Aspirin Pain Reliever - PEOPLES Childrens Chewable Non-Aspirin Pain Reliever - PIGGLY WIGGLY Childrens Chewable Non-Aspirin P.R. - RITE AID Childrens Aceteminophen Non-Aspirin Pain Reliever - Childrens Anacin-3 Chewable Tablets - SUGAR FREE METAMUCIL - ECKERD Sugar Free Natural Fiber Laxative - LONGS Sugar Free Natural Vegetable Powder Laxative - PAYLESS Sugar Free Natural Vegetable Powder Laxative - RALEY'S Sugar Free Natural Vegetable Powder - RITE AID Sugar Free Regular Flavor Nat.Veg.Bulk Powder - SQUIBBCARE Sugar Free Natural Fiber Laxative - THRIFTY Sugar Free Natural Vegetable Laxative - HEALTH BALANCE Childrens Chewable Multivitamin - ZOO CHEWS Animal-Shaped Chewable Multivitamin - MEDIGUARD Childens Multivitamin Supplement (Cherry,Orange and Grape) - EQUATE Chewable Vitamins Animal-Shaped (with Iron) - MEIJER CIRCUS SHAPES (Complete with Calcium,Iron and Minerals) - MIEJER CIRCUS SHAPES (with Iron) - ANIMAL SHAPES Chewable Vitamins Plus Extra C - ANIMAL SHAPES Chewable Vitamins Complete - ANIMAL SHAPES Chewable Vitamins With Iron - REVCO Childrens Chewable Multivitamins - LONGS Children's Chewable Multivitamin - GRAY DRUG FAIR Childrens Chewable Multivitamin source: Use of Aspartame By Pharmaceutical Companies Copyright 1996 Leading Edge Research The above list can be verified by a trip to your local drugstore. The lowest example of bold-faced pandering that can be imagined is palming off known poisons to children by disguising them with cutesy names. Anybody see a correlation with the epidemic asthma levels cited above? What are we doing to our children? This section is getting too long. The story of the politics and deceit behind the FDA approval of aspartame during the past 25 years is a classic in the usual format: poisons legislated into public use through sweetheart arrangements among manufacturers, legislators, and regulators, complete with the usual fraudulent research, hired-gun medical 'experts' proclaiming the safety of a proven toxin, etc. For the whole slimy tale, start with: - Deadly Deception: The Story of Aspartame by Nash Stoddard, Odenwald Press, Dallas, Texas. ISBN 1-884363-14-8. - Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills L. Blaylock, MD, Health Press, 1997. Don't miss the part about the Magic Rat. There was a famous investigation of all the research submitted to the FDA for aspartame's approval. The investigators wrote their findings in a document called the Bressler Report. The Magic Rat was a representation of the type of fraud uncovered by the Bressler Report. It seems there was one rat whose name was A23 LM. According to the Report: " that animal A23LM was alive at week 88, dead from week 92 through week 104, alive at week 108, and dead at week 112. " Even Elvis couldn't do that. Want to know how lame the FDA really is? After the Commissioner and several key lawyers and researchers who were investigating aspartame had accepted lucrative positions with Searle and Monsanto, the FDA had the temerity to come out with a statement like this in 1995: " FDA has no further plans to continue to collect adverse reaction reports or monitor research periodically done on aspartame. " ( Wilcox, FDA branch chief, Food Chemical News 1995) So who's going to monitor it then? The FBI? Here's the bottom line with aspartame: it's too big to get rid of. Just because it's sweet doesn't mean it's a food. Aspartame is not a food; it's a manmade synthetic. Food additives aren't necessarily foods. Aspartame is the #1 food additive on the market. It is also a component of thousands of prescription and non-prescription drugs. We're talking billions and billions of dollars every year. It would take a boatload of Ralph Naders to stop this kind of trade. > > This may be too off topic, or otherwise.. unwanted.. If so, I'll > keep my rants about the allopathic/alternative(many flavors) " war " to > myself Is there another list that talks about stuff like this - > not just (or even so much) about what's good and bad, but how to try > (I know, tilting windmills..) to change the prevailing attitudes, > among doctors, researchers, politicians, and the public - on both > sides of the allopathic/alternative " war " ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 > > This may be too off topic, or otherwise.. unwanted.. If so, I'll > keep my rants about the allopathic/alternative(many flavors) " war " to > myself Is there another list that talks about stuff like this - > not just (or even so much) about what's good and bad, but how to try > (I know, tilting windmills..) to change the prevailing attitudes, > among doctors, researchers, politicians, and the public - on both > sides of the allopathic/alternative " war " ? Well, as long as the FDA caters to the pharmaceutical companies and the food producers, they are never going to be working for our best interests, so I don't trust anything just because it's FDA approved. Since we're all people who have been sick for years because we were failed by mainstream medicine, I don't see how this is such a difficult concept to accept, yk? Mainstream medicine is made up of people who were taught by people who accept goodies from pharmaceutical companies who have a financial interest in shaping their viewpoint. It's only natural that they are going to steer patients in the direction that benefits their benefactors. It really is all about the money, and we are just pawns. I don't think it's a question of why more people don't complain. I think it's more a question of how many people don't know what their symptoms are related to. The more research I do, the more possible causes I unearth for hypo, adrenal fatigue and migraines. Many people just blindly trust their doctor and have no idea that the food they eat or the drugs they take can make their symptoms worse. Choose your poison? No thanks. They can keep 'em. 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 > > This may be too off topic, or otherwise.. unwanted.. If so, I'll > keep my rants about the allopathic/alternative(many flavors) " war " to > myself Is there another list that talks about stuff like this - > not just (or even so much) about what's good and bad, but how to try > (I know, tilting windmills..) to change the prevailing attitudes, > among doctors, researchers, politicians, and the public - on both > sides of the allopathic/alternative " war " ? Well, as long as the FDA caters to the pharmaceutical companies and the food producers, they are never going to be working for our best interests, so I don't trust anything just because it's FDA approved. Since we're all people who have been sick for years because we were failed by mainstream medicine, I don't see how this is such a difficult concept to accept, yk? Mainstream medicine is made up of people who were taught by people who accept goodies from pharmaceutical companies who have a financial interest in shaping their viewpoint. It's only natural that they are going to steer patients in the direction that benefits their benefactors. It really is all about the money, and we are just pawns. I don't think it's a question of why more people don't complain. I think it's more a question of how many people don't know what their symptoms are related to. The more research I do, the more possible causes I unearth for hypo, adrenal fatigue and migraines. Many people just blindly trust their doctor and have no idea that the food they eat or the drugs they take can make their symptoms worse. Choose your poison? No thanks. They can keep 'em. 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 I dont have diabetes so this is not an issue for me. I will only eat real sugar. I believe that aspartame gave my father brain cancer. I wouldn't eat it if you paid me. I certainly empathize with you. English Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 I dont have diabetes so this is not an issue for me. I will only eat real sugar. I believe that aspartame gave my father brain cancer. I wouldn't eat it if you paid me. I certainly empathize with you. English Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 I would never touch aspartame either, but I do use saccharin just one or two packets a day in tea and coffee. I feel it's much safer. Re: OT - Pick Your Poison - aspertame or splenda? - rant on quality of internet I dont have diabetes so this is not an issue for me. I will only eat real sugar. I believe that aspartame gave my father brain cancer. I wouldn't eat it if you paid me. I certainly empathize with you. English Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 I would never touch aspartame either, but I do use saccharin just one or two packets a day in tea and coffee. I feel it's much safer. Re: OT - Pick Your Poison - aspertame or splenda? - rant on quality of internet I dont have diabetes so this is not an issue for me. I will only eat real sugar. I believe that aspartame gave my father brain cancer. I wouldn't eat it if you paid me. I certainly empathize with you. English Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 I would never touch aspartame either, but I do use saccharin just one or two packets a day in tea and coffee. I feel it's much safer. Re: OT - Pick Your Poison - aspertame or splenda? - rant on quality of internet I dont have diabetes so this is not an issue for me. I will only eat real sugar. I believe that aspartame gave my father brain cancer. I wouldn't eat it if you paid me. I certainly empathize with you. English Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 " bigeyes1962 " wrote: > > Well, as long as the FDA caters to the pharmaceutical companies and > the food producers, they are never going to be working for our best > interests, so I don't trust anything just because it's FDA approved. Kind of related (and my soapbox): Yellow 5 is an FDA approved food color, even though NUMEROUS complaints have been documented to the FDA about adverse reactions like hives, asthma, eczema, ADHD, etc. This food color is actually banned in some European countries, but is in numerous foods here, many that kids eat. > I don't think it's a question of why more people don't complain. I > think it's more a question of how many people don't know what their > symptoms are related to. The more research I do, the more possible > causes I unearth for hypo, adrenal fatigue and migraines. Many people > just blindly trust their doctor and have no idea that the food they > eat or the drugs they take can make their symptoms worse. I helped write a petition to the FDA to ban Yellow 5. It was submitted in 2001. I can see it was taken seriously. Most with hives, asthma, eczema, etc. have no idea that Yellow 5 could be the cause of their symptoms. So they just use HC cream, inhalers, antihistamines, Ritalin, etc. to control their symptoms. Keeping it in our food supply is a windfall for pharmaceuticals, but that would be a conspiracy. There's no such thing, right? Barb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 " bigeyes1962 " wrote: > > Well, as long as the FDA caters to the pharmaceutical companies and > the food producers, they are never going to be working for our best > interests, so I don't trust anything just because it's FDA approved. Kind of related (and my soapbox): Yellow 5 is an FDA approved food color, even though NUMEROUS complaints have been documented to the FDA about adverse reactions like hives, asthma, eczema, ADHD, etc. This food color is actually banned in some European countries, but is in numerous foods here, many that kids eat. > I don't think it's a question of why more people don't complain. I > think it's more a question of how many people don't know what their > symptoms are related to. The more research I do, the more possible > causes I unearth for hypo, adrenal fatigue and migraines. Many people > just blindly trust their doctor and have no idea that the food they > eat or the drugs they take can make their symptoms worse. I helped write a petition to the FDA to ban Yellow 5. It was submitted in 2001. I can see it was taken seriously. Most with hives, asthma, eczema, etc. have no idea that Yellow 5 could be the cause of their symptoms. So they just use HC cream, inhalers, antihistamines, Ritalin, etc. to control their symptoms. Keeping it in our food supply is a windfall for pharmaceuticals, but that would be a conspiracy. There's no such thing, right? Barb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 > Keeping it in our food supply > is a windfall for pharmaceuticals, but that would be a conspiracy. > There's no such thing, right? > > Barb > Of course not. We're just paranoid. <rolling eyes> They grow richer and people stay sick. 8( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 > Keeping it in our food supply > is a windfall for pharmaceuticals, but that would be a conspiracy. > There's no such thing, right? > > Barb > Of course not. We're just paranoid. <rolling eyes> They grow richer and people stay sick. 8( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2008 Report Share Posted January 22, 2008 i think it is much better to stop sugar alltogether. once you are able to stop using it you don;t crave any more. Nil Re: Re: OT - Pick Your Poison - aspertame or splenda? - rant on quality of internet Gikas wrote: > I would never touch aspartame either, but I do use saccharin just one or two packets a day in tea and coffee. > I feel it's much safer. > > I just got some erythritol to try. It isn't supposed to cause the GI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2008 Report Share Posted January 22, 2008 i think it is much better to stop sugar alltogether. once you are able to stop using it you don;t crave any more. Nil Re: Re: OT - Pick Your Poison - aspertame or splenda? - rant on quality of internet Gikas wrote: > I would never touch aspartame either, but I do use saccharin just one or two packets a day in tea and coffee. > I feel it's much safer. > > I just got some erythritol to try. It isn't supposed to cause the GI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2008 Report Share Posted January 22, 2008 This is a very powerful sweetener that I have used. http://sweetzfree.com/recipes.html Another that I have tried is : http://www24.netrition.com/nutragenics_fiberfit_page.html I like the erythritol for making candy during the holidays. Gale > > I would never touch aspartame either, but I do use saccharin just one or two packets a day in tea and coffee. > > I feel it's much safer. > > > > > I just got some erythritol to try. It isn't supposed to cause the GI > effects of Xylitol, maltitol and other sugar alcohols. It is too bad we > can't get cyclamate here. It has been proven it didn't cause cancer > after all. I'm told its legal in Canada, but not here. Some people who > live close enough stock up when they cross the border.As I recall, it > tasted far better than any other sweetener I've used in the past 40 > years, but maybe I mis-remember. I do remember I liked pop that had > cyclamate, and stopped using SF soda when it was withdrawn because > saccharin was, to me, nasty in aftertaste. > sol > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2008 Report Share Posted January 22, 2008 Val, I love the DaVinci syrups also. I use the rasberry on my low carb sf cheesecake & the pineapple in my stirfry. Yummy!!! Gale > > I love the Vanilla and Hazlenut flavors inthe Da Vinci SF syrups. Yes my > coffee comes also in decaf! It is from www.deansbeans.com > > -- > Artistic Grooming- Hurricane WV > > http://www.stopthethyroidmadness.com/ > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/NaturalThyroidHormonesADRENALS/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2008 Report Share Posted January 22, 2008 > Most with hives, asthma, eczema, etc. have no idea that Yellow 5 > could be the cause of their symptoms. So they just use HC cream, > inhalers, antihistamines, Ritalin, etc. to control their symptoms. > Keeping it in our food supply is a windfall for pharmaceuticals, > but that would be a conspiracy. There's no such thing, right? > I'm not sure I believe in *intentional* conspiracies like this. But I do certainly believe in *unintentional* conspiracies - where one company(ies) does one thing, that happens to benefit another - everyone " benefits " (except the general public), and so things just keep going as the status quo. I think even when most of the public *do* ask questions (or are pushed to consider such) about health effects of aspertame, alumnized salt, aluminum from cans leaching into coke, phthlates from plastic leaching into milk and then may cause all maner or hormone havoc in babies and maybe adults, fluorine, etc, they just say, " I'm not sick - I dont' see anyone else who is.. " But they compaire *their* health and the health of " other people " to the general public. And since all these things are ubiquitous - there is no control population to point to and say " Well, *they're* healthier. " , peoblems can creep in and nobody sees it - the populationas a whole just gets sicker. Maybe there's some tribe in Africa or somewhere that has less exposure (to persistent chemicals), and none to aspertame, table salt, Al cans (or Coke for that matter - who knows what it could be doing), etc. But their lifestyles are so different from ours that it's impossible to say definitively it's just becuase they have less exposure to such things. It's probably the same thing with hypoT and adrenal symptoms. And having our doctors (and friends? family?) say that " you're fine. Nothing is wrong. Don't be a hypochondriac (read: don't listen to your own body) " does not help at all. So this list is teeming with life as a results. I love the new soda that actualy advirtises that it is made with " 100% pure cane sugar " , and says on the box " Corn is for cows. Sugar is for soda. " LOL! I wonder how they ever got the message that some people really *don't* want to be drinking HFCS by the gallon-a-year (at least)? Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.