Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Andy Culters Diagnotic checklist. Accurate?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I have just re-read Andy Cutlers book " amalgam illness " for the

second time in a month, and now I have some questions. The first of

which is:

The section " diagnostic checklist " page 56-57. After re-reading

again and again its now mostly clear whats what and how to tot up

the totals.

Q: How accurate is this method of diagnosing mercury poisoning? I'm

not talking about the LAB tests, just the stuff I can do/see on my

own at home? i.e all my symptoms? Allergy, bleeding gum, tremors,

constipation, CFS, MCS, etc….

I was able to answer 21 of the 58 questions (without any lab tests

done) and of the 21 questions I could answer 16 where positive.

According to his table for 97.5 pct certainty 7 positive out of 18-

24 questions answered (m) is enough.

And for 99.9pct certainty 8 positives out of 18-21 questions (m) is

enough.

I scored 16. If I read up Fibromyalgia for an hour or two I would

probably be 17 positive.

All the history, symptoms, troubles all come together nicely in his

book and I am now 99.99pct sure I have mercury poisoning. I have

also been confirmed mercury toxic and highly mercury sensitive by

two different muscle testing people. I am 99.99pct sure because of

this book he wrote, but are these diagnostic checklist accurate?

Are there any other checklists i can cross-check with?

It's all pretty humbling finding this stuff out. Amalgams start

coming out Wednesday with correct protocol.

Sunshine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

> I have just re-read Andy Cutlers book " amalgam illness " for the

> second time in a month, and now I have some questions. The first of

> which is:

>

> The section " diagnostic checklist " page 56-57. After re-reading

> again and again its now mostly clear whats what and how to tot up

> the totals.

>

> Q: How accurate is this method of diagnosing mercury poisoning?

It was very accurate for me. I just redid the test from memory of

where I was at before amalgam removal. For me, m = 27, n = 19. To

have 99.9% certainty n would have to be 9 or higher. No doubt.

In all the time I have been following groups I have suggested that

people take this test but I haven't read reports from many people.

I'm

> not talking about the LAB tests, just the stuff I can do/see on my

> own at home? i.e all my symptoms? Allergy, bleeding gum, tremors,

> constipation, CFS, MCS, etc….

>

> I was able to answer 21 of the 58 questions (without any lab tests

> done) and of the 21 questions I could answer 16 where positive.

>

> According to his table for 97.5 pct certainty 7 positive out of 18-

> 24 questions answered (m) is enough.

>

> And for 99.9pct certainty 8 positives out of 18-21 questions (m) is

> enough.

>

> I scored 16. If I read up Fibromyalgia for an hour or two I would

> probably be 17 positive.

>

That's enough to convince me.

> All the history, symptoms, troubles all come together nicely in his

> book and I am now 99.99pct sure I have mercury poisoning. I have

> also been confirmed mercury toxic and highly mercury sensitive by

> two different muscle testing people. I am 99.99pct sure because of

> this book he wrote, but are these diagnostic checklist accurate?

>

> Are there any other checklists i can cross-check with?

>

Not that I am aware of.

The other thing to do is have a hair test (DDI essential elements).

Once you have your amalgams out and start to chelate, symptoms with

chelation will confirm toxicity.

> It's all pretty humbling finding this stuff out. Amalgams start

> coming out Wednesday with correct protocol.

>

Good luck.

J

> Sunshine

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi . i have been thinking about yr post the other day. you said:-

> Once you have your amalgams out and start to chelate, symptoms with

> chelation will confirm toxicity.

thats very interesting. so does that mean if i have no mercury in me

that i will get NO symptoms when i chelate after all amalgams out?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think my husband's a good example of not having toxicity. Despite 8-

9 amalgams and a gold crown, he can take a once per day supplement

with 20mg ALA and not be 'phased' at all by it. On the other hand,

even though my amalgams came out 2 1/2 years ago, I can't tolerate the

symptoms of that much ALA spread out over a day with frequent dosing &

have to use DMSA with it. Hope that helps.

Joanne

>

> Hi . i have been thinking about yr post the other day. you

said:-

>

> > Once you have your amalgams out and start to chelate, symptoms with

> > chelation will confirm toxicity.

>

> thats very interesting. so does that mean if i have no mercury in me

> that i will get NO symptoms when i chelate after all amalgams out?

>

> Thanks

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

> Hi . i have been thinking about yr post the other day. you said:-

>

> > Once you have your amalgams out and start to chelate, symptoms with

> > chelation will confirm toxicity.

>

> thats very interesting. so does that mean if i have no mercury in me

> that i will get NO symptoms when i chelate after all amalgams out?

>

Theoretically, yes. There aren't very many people in this world who

have zero mercury in them.

You would need to test with increasing amounts of chelator - like if

there was no reaction at 12.5 mg, try 25 mg, if no reaction try 50 mg

and so on. I don't know what dose you would use to decide the trial

was over - whether it would be 1/2 mg/lb, 1 mg/lb or the insane 10

mg/kg that some DAN doctors use. ALA would have to be part of the

trial because it is the only chelator that goes after brain mercury.

> Thanks

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks, its all very interesting. whatever i do, i will start very

slowly and cautiously, starting with low dosages.

I took some cystine a couple of weeks ago, on advise, and that is not

something i will try again in a hurry.

it seems that the doctors, osteopaths, natropaths or whatever that i

see have very very limited first hand experience in mercury detoxing

but are very liberal in dishing out advise and things to take.

the knowledge and advise i recieve from this (and other) dedicated

mercury forums is much much more consistant with what i have read in

the mercury books.

thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

what a strange world we live in? what timing....i have just read the

chorella thread here & i have just received an email from my

Kinesiologist, to whom i trust very much, suggesting i take chorella. I

can guess what he did, he just googled mercury detox, read a couple of

links and then suggested i take it.....

note to self.....do my own RESEARCH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...