Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

RE: Teeth (O/T)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Gold is a bit controversial because it isn't just gold -- pure gold is too

soft to use as a dental material, so it's an alloy of several metals.

Some holistic dentists (including mine) use Belleglass, and a cement called

Holistore. These are completely metal-free, but of course are not as strong

as materials containing metal. Like virtually all dental cements and

composites, Holistore also contains a plasticizer called bisphenol A, which

I'm not too crazy about. But you've got to put something in there, so no

point going crazy about it. You won't find a perfect material -- believe

me, I've tried.

Dean

Teeth (O/T)

I got my amalgams removed a year ago and had two root canals pulled.

Wouldn't you know I had to have another root canal. The dentist can

put on a porcelin crown or a layer of gold and then porcelin, which is

stronger. I understand gold can be OK. What should I do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I can attest to Belleglass. I have been having all my replacements done with

it and so far it is great. My teeth feel better and even long-standing tooth

sensitivities are fading. I can bite down on semi-hard things again without

pain! I also had ozone treatments on each tooth worked on and that may be

helping also. Bio-dentists rock.

NJ

> Teeth (O/T)

>

>

> I got my amalgams removed a year ago and had two root canals pulled.

> Wouldn't you know I had to have another root canal. The dentist can

> put on a porcelin crown or a layer of gold and then

> porcelin, which is

> stronger. I understand gold can be OK. What should I do?

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

also to note that root canals themselves are toxic to the body/immune

system. A dead tooth gives off toxins that get into your body. And

gold is never 100 precent gold in tooth revisions. It's usually mixed

with a host of other metals otherwise it would be too soft. Metals

generally are a problem. My Huggins dentist doesn't do root canals at

all or use any metals. In that case your option would be a metal free

partial or a bridge.

>

> I got my amalgams removed a year ago and had two root canals

pulled.

> Wouldn't you know I had to have another root canal. The dentist can

> put on a porcelin crown or a layer of gold and then porcelin, which

is

> stronger. I understand gold can be OK. What should I do?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

also to note that root canals themselves are toxic to the body/immune

system. A dead tooth gives off toxins that get into your body. And

gold is never 100 precent gold in tooth revisions. It's usually mixed

with a host of other metals otherwise it would be too soft. Metals

generally are a problem. My Huggins dentist doesn't do root canals at

all or use any metals. In that case your option would be a metal free

partial or a bridge.

>

> I got my amalgams removed a year ago and had two root canals

pulled.

> Wouldn't you know I had to have another root canal. The dentist can

> put on a porcelin crown or a layer of gold and then porcelin, which

is

> stronger. I understand gold can be OK. What should I do?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

also to note that root canals themselves are toxic to the body/immune

system. A dead tooth gives off toxins that get into your body. And

gold is never 100 precent gold in tooth revisions. It's usually mixed

with a host of other metals otherwise it would be too soft. Metals

generally are a problem. My Huggins dentist doesn't do root canals at

all or use any metals. In that case your option would be a metal free

partial or a bridge.

>

> I got my amalgams removed a year ago and had two root canals

pulled.

> Wouldn't you know I had to have another root canal. The dentist can

> put on a porcelin crown or a layer of gold and then porcelin, which

is

> stronger. I understand gold can be OK. What should I do?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It's been a while since I looked into this stuff but if I recall correctly,

porcelain is very bio-compatible, but somewhat fragile. That's basically

the trade-off. So if you're willing to be a bit more careful, I believe

pure porcelain is quite safe.

Dean

Teeth

Thanks for the information. I found bio-identical dentists to be

extremely expensive. I have had some success in arming myself with

information to non bio-identical dentists and seeing if they will work

with me. I will take your information and see if he is willing to use

Belleglass and Holistore instead of pure porcelin. However, if that is

not possible, is plain porcelin a second-best alternative? I am just

trying to go in with plan A and plan B. Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It's been a while since I looked into this stuff but if I recall correctly,

porcelain is very bio-compatible, but somewhat fragile. That's basically

the trade-off. So if you're willing to be a bit more careful, I believe

pure porcelain is quite safe.

Dean

Teeth

Thanks for the information. I found bio-identical dentists to be

extremely expensive. I have had some success in arming myself with

information to non bio-identical dentists and seeing if they will work

with me. I will take your information and see if he is willing to use

Belleglass and Holistore instead of pure porcelin. However, if that is

not possible, is plain porcelin a second-best alternative? I am just

trying to go in with plan A and plan B. Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It's been a while since I looked into this stuff but if I recall correctly,

porcelain is very bio-compatible, but somewhat fragile. That's basically

the trade-off. So if you're willing to be a bit more careful, I believe

pure porcelain is quite safe.

Dean

Teeth

Thanks for the information. I found bio-identical dentists to be

extremely expensive. I have had some success in arming myself with

information to non bio-identical dentists and seeing if they will work

with me. I will take your information and see if he is willing to use

Belleglass and Holistore instead of pure porcelin. However, if that is

not possible, is plain porcelin a second-best alternative? I am just

trying to go in with plan A and plan B. Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

When my bio-dentist was considering pure porcelain, without a metal base, I

asked him, because I'd heard it was weak for molars. He said the 'porcelain'

he uses is more properly called a 'ceramic', and has held up very well in

his practice. But, it would be best to give up things like hard pretzels,

chewing on ice, etc, which could break even regular teeth, as a precaution.

Makes sense.

I went with Belleglass because it doesn't contain aluminum, and even 'pure'

porcelain contains some aluminum, and I am toxic for aluminum. For a

lab-baked crown, it probably doesn't leak much aluminum, but I wanted to be

careful, as I am replacing a lot of fillings. Also, my biocompatibility came

back good for belleglass. FYI, it did not cost me any more to get the

Belleglass than the porcelain.

If you get porcelain, you may want to make sure it is not porcelain over

metal, and stay away from biting hazards.

NJ

> Teeth

>

>

> Thanks for the information. I found bio-identical dentists to be

> extremely expensive. I have had some success in arming myself with

> information to non bio-identical dentists and seeing if

> they will work

> with me. I will take your information and see if he is

> willing to use

> Belleglass and Holistore instead of pure porcelin. However,

> if that is

> not possible, is plain porcelin a second-best alternative? I am just

> trying to go in with plan A and plan B. Thanks again

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

When my bio-dentist was considering pure porcelain, without a metal base, I

asked him, because I'd heard it was weak for molars. He said the 'porcelain'

he uses is more properly called a 'ceramic', and has held up very well in

his practice. But, it would be best to give up things like hard pretzels,

chewing on ice, etc, which could break even regular teeth, as a precaution.

Makes sense.

I went with Belleglass because it doesn't contain aluminum, and even 'pure'

porcelain contains some aluminum, and I am toxic for aluminum. For a

lab-baked crown, it probably doesn't leak much aluminum, but I wanted to be

careful, as I am replacing a lot of fillings. Also, my biocompatibility came

back good for belleglass. FYI, it did not cost me any more to get the

Belleglass than the porcelain.

If you get porcelain, you may want to make sure it is not porcelain over

metal, and stay away from biting hazards.

NJ

> Teeth

>

>

> Thanks for the information. I found bio-identical dentists to be

> extremely expensive. I have had some success in arming myself with

> information to non bio-identical dentists and seeing if

> they will work

> with me. I will take your information and see if he is

> willing to use

> Belleglass and Holistore instead of pure porcelin. However,

> if that is

> not possible, is plain porcelin a second-best alternative? I am just

> trying to go in with plan A and plan B. Thanks again

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

When my bio-dentist was considering pure porcelain, without a metal base, I

asked him, because I'd heard it was weak for molars. He said the 'porcelain'

he uses is more properly called a 'ceramic', and has held up very well in

his practice. But, it would be best to give up things like hard pretzels,

chewing on ice, etc, which could break even regular teeth, as a precaution.

Makes sense.

I went with Belleglass because it doesn't contain aluminum, and even 'pure'

porcelain contains some aluminum, and I am toxic for aluminum. For a

lab-baked crown, it probably doesn't leak much aluminum, but I wanted to be

careful, as I am replacing a lot of fillings. Also, my biocompatibility came

back good for belleglass. FYI, it did not cost me any more to get the

Belleglass than the porcelain.

If you get porcelain, you may want to make sure it is not porcelain over

metal, and stay away from biting hazards.

NJ

> Teeth

>

>

> Thanks for the information. I found bio-identical dentists to be

> extremely expensive. I have had some success in arming myself with

> information to non bio-identical dentists and seeing if

> they will work

> with me. I will take your information and see if he is

> willing to use

> Belleglass and Holistore instead of pure porcelin. However,

> if that is

> not possible, is plain porcelin a second-best alternative? I am just

> trying to go in with plan A and plan B. Thanks again

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Again, it's been a while since I was studying this stuff but if I remember

correctly, porcelain and ceramic are quite different. Ceramic can be

extremely hard and durable, but can contain metals. Porcelain, if I recall

correctly, does not contain metals and is more likely biocompatible, but is

not as tough.

Dean

RE: RE: Teeth (O/T)

When my bio-dentist was considering pure porcelain, without a metal base,

I

asked him, because I'd heard it was weak for molars. He said the

'porcelain'

he uses is more properly called a 'ceramic', and has held up very well in

his practice. But, it would be best to give up things like hard pretzels,

chewing on ice, etc, which could break even regular teeth, as a

precaution.

Makes sense.

I went with Belleglass because it doesn't contain aluminum, and even

'pure'

porcelain contains some aluminum, and I am toxic for aluminum. For a

lab-baked crown, it probably doesn't leak much aluminum, but I wanted to

be

careful, as I am replacing a lot of fillings. Also, my biocompatibility

came

back good for belleglass. FYI, it did not cost me any more to get the

Belleglass than the porcelain.

If you get porcelain, you may want to make sure it is not porcelain over

metal, and stay away from biting hazards.

NJ

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I have 3 front porcelain caps which have lasted 35 years - slight fillings done

to the backs of them near the gum line a couple of years ago to prolong their

life - I was told that they should last 10 years when I had them done. I also

have a back tooth done about 6 years ago. I have always treated my caps as any

other teeth & my dentist says I have a strong bite, and have had no problems

with them at all. They are not metal lined.

Val

....just for the record.....my porcelain crowns lasted me one week and

two weeks, respectively.

~Inga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This is good to hear.

I wonder why mine did not last, as the composites that that same

dentist did are doing well 17 years later, so it is not like he was a

slouch dentist. Still, he told me they would not be as strong as

other materials, but it was worth a go, as I tested negatively to

most other materials.

Mine were on my molars and they cracked on chewing and biting dow on

them. I have since lost those teeth to the crowns failing and not

having the funds to have them redone in time.

however, I will likley be in need of more corwns coming up. Do you

know anythng more that you can add about the procedure, or mateirl

that made theese so effective? It would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Inga

> I have 3 front porcelain caps which have lasted 35 years - slight

> fillings done to the backs of them near the gum line a couple of

> years ago to prolong their life - I was told that they should last

> 10 years when I had them done. I also have a back tooth done about

> 6 years ago. I have always treated my caps as any other teeth & my

> dentist says I have a strong bite, and have had no problems with

> them at all. They are not metal lined.

>

> Val

>

> ....just for the record.....my porcelain crowns lasted me one week and

> two weeks, respectively.

> ~Inga

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Just wondering what type of testing for dental materials compatibility you are

all using. I had electro-dermal testing but since there is no scientific basis

for that I wonder if I should let my dentist proceed using this. What about the

Huggins blood test for bio compatible materials, I read that this test is

questionable also. As it is very important to do everything possible to avoid

auto-immune reactions with new materials, I would appreciate any feedback on

this.

Donna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Just wondering what type of testing for dental materials compatibility you are

all using. I had electro-dermal testing but since there is no scientific basis

for that I wonder if I should let my dentist proceed using this. What about the

Huggins blood test for bio compatible materials, I read that this test is

questionable also. As it is very important to do everything possible to avoid

auto-immune reactions with new materials, I would appreciate any feedback on

this.

Donna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Just wondering what type of testing for dental materials compatibility

> you are all using. I had electro-dermal testing but since there is no

> scientific basis for that I wonder if I should let my dentist proceed

> using this. What about the Huggins blood test for bio compatible

> materials, I read that this test is questionable also. As it is very

> important to do everything possible to avoid auto-immune reactions with

> new materials, I would appreciate any feedback on this.

>

> Donna

The Clifford Test that Dr Huggins uses is very comprehensive and I don't

think you get better.

http://www.ccrlab.com/

Dean-SA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Just wondering what type of testing for dental materials compatibility

> you are all using. I had electro-dermal testing but since there is no

> scientific basis for that I wonder if I should let my dentist proceed

> using this. What about the Huggins blood test for bio compatible

> materials, I read that this test is questionable also. As it is very

> important to do everything possible to avoid auto-immune reactions with

> new materials, I would appreciate any feedback on this.

>

> Donna

The Clifford Test that Dr Huggins uses is very comprehensive and I don't

think you get better.

http://www.ccrlab.com/

Dean-SA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Just wondering what type of testing for dental materials compatibility

> you are all using. I had electro-dermal testing but since there is no

> scientific basis for that I wonder if I should let my dentist proceed

> using this. What about the Huggins blood test for bio compatible

> materials, I read that this test is questionable also. As it is very

> important to do everything possible to avoid auto-immune reactions with

> new materials, I would appreciate any feedback on this.

>

> Donna

The Clifford Test that Dr Huggins uses is very comprehensive and I don't

think you get better.

http://www.ccrlab.com/

Dean-SA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...