Guest guest Posted March 30, 2007 Report Share Posted March 30, 2007 i found a section in Amalgam Illness, page 83, that seems relevant to my earlier question and barb's post. how would you interpret andy's comments below? " some people (1 in 10?) need further attention to amalgam tattoos, amalgam chips, NICO, etc. the basic rule is to look for this stuff if you stop getting better and don't make the level of progress expected. it is normal to have progress slow down or even stop getting better for a few months starting about 3 or 4 months after amalgam removal. some opele have serious brain or liver intoxication and have to treat it properly to fix it--they won't get better if they treat a " cavitation " instead. people who clearly have an unresolved problem should look into cavitations and have them surgically clearned out if one is actually present. " (AI, page 83) is andy available to respond? " the basic rule is to look for this stuff if you stop getting better and don't make the level of progress expected. " so, should i carefully try chelation (without opening up the grey resin tooth) and if don't get better or get a lot worse(?), then risk losing the tooth to clean it out? gratefully, kendra --- barb43230@... wrote: > > I just had a couple amalgams replaced and the dentist offered the > options of drilling away " good tooth " with grey leakage in it (silver > &/or mercury I don't know which) mostly for cosmetic reasons (dentists > can't say mercury is toxic or can lose license) or leaving > structurally sound tooth that looks grey around the composite. I chose > the latter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2007 Report Share Posted March 30, 2007 i found a section in Amalgam Illness, page 83, that seems relevant to my earlier question and barb's post. how would you interpret andy's comments below? " some people (1 in 10?) need further attention to amalgam tattoos, amalgam chips, NICO, etc. the basic rule is to look for this stuff if you stop getting better and don't make the level of progress expected. it is normal to have progress slow down or even stop getting better for a few months starting about 3 or 4 months after amalgam removal. some opele have serious brain or liver intoxication and have to treat it properly to fix it--they won't get better if they treat a " cavitation " instead. people who clearly have an unresolved problem should look into cavitations and have them surgically clearned out if one is actually present. " (AI, page 83) is andy available to respond? " the basic rule is to look for this stuff if you stop getting better and don't make the level of progress expected. " so, should i carefully try chelation (without opening up the grey resin tooth) and if don't get better or get a lot worse(?), then risk losing the tooth to clean it out? gratefully, kendra --- barb43230@... wrote: > > I just had a couple amalgams replaced and the dentist offered the > options of drilling away " good tooth " with grey leakage in it (silver > &/or mercury I don't know which) mostly for cosmetic reasons (dentists > can't say mercury is toxic or can lose license) or leaving > structurally sound tooth that looks grey around the composite. I chose > the latter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2007 Report Share Posted March 30, 2007 I have read reports from people who thought that their mouths were totally amalgam free (according to the dentist). When they started chelation they had significant problems - much more than would be expected from normal rounds of chelation. When they went back and had a dentist look more amalgam was found hidden somewhere. If the person is in fragile health to begin with I would think that they couldn't afford to take risks involved with testing chelation if they know that there are bits of amalgam left. > > > > I just had a couple amalgams replaced and the dentist offered the > > options of drilling away " good tooth " with grey leakage in it > (silver > &/or mercury I don't know which) mostly for cosmetic > reasons (dentists > can't say mercury is toxic or can lose license) > or leaving > structurally sound tooth that looks grey around the > composite. I chose > the latter. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.