Guest guest Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120835372/abstract?CRETRY=1 & SRETRY=0 MRCP vs ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: Review of current literature Koray HEKIMOGLU*, Yucel USTUNDAG † , Abdurrahim DUSAK*, Zuhal ERDEM*, Bulent KARADEMIR*, Selim AYDEMIR † and Sadi GUNDOGDU* *Department of Radiology, Karaelmas University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, and † Department of Gastroenterology, Karaelmas University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey Correspondence to: Koray HEKIMOGLU, Karaelmas University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, 67600, Zonguldak, Turkey. Email: korayhekim@... Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. KEYWORDS biliary pathology • endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography • magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography • heavily T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Recently developed magnetic resonance (MR) techniques permit fast and correct imaging of the entire biliary tree with a high spatial resolution. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic potential of one of these new MR sequences in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) procedure and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with review of current literatures. METHODS: A total of 295 patients were enrolled in this study prospectively. Of these, 11 were excluded from the study due to inadequate MRCP image quality and 15 more were excluded due to unsuccessful cannulation during ERCP. Thus, finally 269 patients (124 men and 145 women with a mean age of 57 years; range: 23–92 years) were included. The MRCP procedure was performed before the ERCP in all cases. All MRCP studies were performed with recently developed new MR technique using a heavily T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence. This TSE sequence is currently one of the most widely used multiplanar 3-D MR technique, having a high spatial resolution and fast imaging capacity. RESULTS: The study participants were classified into four main groups; normal into group I, stone disease into group II, tumor into group III and others into group IV. Group I consisted of 228 patients who had a normal pancreaticobiliary tree on both the MRCP and ERCP examinations. In group II there were 18 patients, for whom the MRCP had a 88.9% sensitivity and a 100% specificity for diagnosing biliary stone disease. Its positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy rates were 100%, 99.2% and 99.2%, respectively. The MRCP had a 100% sensitivity and a 100% specificity for 20 patients in group III. It also had 100% PPV, 100% NPV, and 100% total accuracy rates in this group. In three patients in group IV, the MRCP had a 100% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Its PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRCP is used with increasing frequency as a non-invasive alternative to ERCP and the diagnostic results of MRCP with a heavily T2-weighted TSE MR sequence and ERCP are comparable with high accuracy in various hepatobiliary pathologies. DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00339.x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.