Guest guest Posted April 28, 2007 Report Share Posted April 28, 2007 For those who haven't seen this yet, it is a must-read! The role of thiols, dithiols, nutritional factors and interacting ligands in the toxicology of mercury. J.P.K. Rooney, Toxicology 2007 Mar 1. A copy of the paper is available in the autism-mercury files (search for Rooney): http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Autism-Mercury/files/ A few teasers: " Further research is needed into the actions of ALA as a chelator - in particular investigation of frequent low dose chelation as suggested by Cutler (1999). ...Cutler makes a plausible argument regarding the frequency of chelator dosing which merits the attention of the scientific community. ...it is also clear...that the effect of ALA on mercury toxicity is dependent on dosage size and on the spacing of dosages in time. " " ...NAC and GSH would appear to be poor treatment choices for mercury toxicity due to the high risk for redistribution of mercury... " " ...chelation challenge tests...do not accurately reflect mercury levels in the brain. Given that the brain is one of the main target organs for both elemental and organic mercury, and that the brain retains mercury for many years...this is a fairly serious flaw. " " Current chelation challenge tests are inaccurate as used clinically, and owing to the large doses often used, carry risks to the patient of redistribution of mercury... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.