Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 I''ve read that the flouride content is *less* depending on how/when the tea leaves are prepared. I wonder, are there any *solid* animal cancer studies on sodoim fluoride/fluro-silicate/fluro-silic acid or whatever industrial wastes they use to poison the water supply (most of which never even gets INTO a human being, to do anything at all - most is used in industrial processes). There is apparently something in the FDA code that says (I think) that if something is shown to cause cancer in animals, it MUST be declared unsafe for humans (the " Delaney Ammendment " ) That argument is currently (??) being tried with the newer cancer studies with aspertaime in rats. Not that I expect anything to happen while Bush is in office, but perhaps after him. Of course, then the only thing they'll really have is Splenda and acefame-K (sp), given that they won't let Stevia into foods, and band cyclamate for some reason (dubious cancer study?) I wonder what kind of hullabaloo it would cause if some reasearch found that Splenda will " consort " with the estrogen receptor (and/or others..)? AFAIK, the FDA has no provisions (yet) to deal with such endocrine disrupting chemicals that don't cause cancer. The scary thing is, Splenda has only been on the market for what - about 3 or 4 years? And it's only starting to penetrate the soda market (Diet Rite uses it, and Coke seems to be doing " trial runs " - I can get Diet Splenda Coke in *cans* but not in bottles. Great! I get to trade a poisonous alcohol for the possibility of aluminum leaching into my coke.. Time to start drinking only sea salt (reverse osmosized) water with a bit of Stevia. Since Splenda hasn't been on the market for long, especially in soda (possibly the biggest " consuption sub-market " , we won't see the reproductive effects (on fetuses) for another 10 years *at the least*! Probably more like 20, and certainly 30 until there would be enough cases to " warrant attention " (unless people take these things seriously for a change) I think I also read that the fluoride content of green tea is inversely related to the EGCG content for some reason. Jim > I would not touch green tea. It s full of fluoride. All tea only grows > on fuoride rich soils and we certainly fdo not need an endocrine > disruptor liek fluoride to consume > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.