Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Intro

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Welcome, Bev. Too bad you had to find us, good that you did.

--- bhelent rex_bevthoman@...> wrote:

> Anyways my hubby was recently

> diagnosed with diabetes and we're trying to get it under control, and

> we have 2 teenage kids that I'm concerned about them getting it (they

> eat far too much sugar).

OK, but eating sugar isn't the whole problem, eating carbs (which includes all

sugars) is more to

the point. Besides which it's the build up of belly fat in a person that has the

inherited

predisposition to develop Type 2 diabetes that's the REAL problem. Of course too

much food,

particularly carbs may push your kids over the edge sometime.

The changes we're making for my husband has

> to be good for the whole family though.

Very true.

Ted Quick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, Bev...your original intro didn't come up on my computer but from

what I read of it tacked onto this response by Ted, I'm making some

assumptions about what you know of diabetes control so I'm going to

append my " standard newby letter " here. You'll find lots of helpful

information there - enough to keep you busy for a while. Please also

follow the links - there's a wealth of info there, too.

First of all, let me refer you to two of the best books about diabetes.

Read 'em and you'll learn a lot:

The first one is called

" The First Year, Type Two Diabetes, An Essential Guide for the Newly

Diagnosed " by Gretchen Becker. Gretchen is a list member and her book

is an excellent guide. It's in paperback and available online from

Amazon if your local bookstore doesn't have it.

The second book is called

" Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solutions " by K. Bernstein, M.D. You

can get it from the library but it's such a good reference that you

really should have it in your home library. Dr. Bernstein is a longtime

type 1 who controls his diabetes using a lowcarb diet as well as

insulin.. Many of us - both type 1 and 2 -- on this list have found

great success using his plan or a modified version thereof.

.

And here's the URL to Dr. Bernstein's website, where there's lots of

good stuff:

http://www.diabetes-normalsugars.com/index.shtml

These two books will give you good basic information on the ins and

outs of diabetes management.

I would further refer you to an excellent informational website titled "

" What They Don't Tell You About Diabetes "

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/

If it isn't there for some reason, let me know and I can email you the

contents -- I have it in my archives now.

I would also refer you to Mendosa's website, where

there's a wealth of diabetic information and good links. He also has

an online diabetes newsletter which is very good. It's also an

excellent source for information about the GI index (glycemic index).

www.mendosa.com

There's one thing that's sure to make BGs rise and that's carbohydrates.

Cutting out high GI carbs is an excellent way to control your BGs and

the more you cut, the better. Most of us find that the " whites " --

breads, cereals and pastas, in fact anything made with grain - will

raise our BGs. Also, rice and potatoes will do the same. And of course,

cakes and cookies and sweets of all kinds, including fruits and fruit

juices.

Watch out for " low calorie " foods; often they're higher in carbs. Learn

to read food labels.

Dr. Bernstein recommends about 40 carbs a day total. This is really only

for the dedictated low carber and IMHO hard to maintain over the long

run. However, I've read that the average American eats about 300 carbs a

day, so the truth is somewhere in between. The best thing you can do

for yourself (if you haven't already) is buy a meter and use it

FREQUENTLY. At the beginning you want to learn how different foods

affect your BG and to do this you need to eat one food at a time,

testing first...then test one and two hours afterwards. Weigh out the

amounts and keep good notes. You'll use up a lot of strips in the

beginning but the rewards are definitely worth the expense and bother

because in the end, you'll know what foods to avoid and which are okay.

Diabetes is a very individual disease and we often say YMMV - " your

mileage may vary " -- what works for one may not work for another.

You want to aim for postprandial (two hours after meal) BG of 120.

Keeping your BGs between 70 and 140 are your goals. If you can do this

longterm, you can probably avoid the dreaded consequences of longterm

poor BG control...and I'm sure I don't have to list those for you. (I

will if you want, though).

Here's my own list of pretty lowcarb veggies:

Spinach

Cauliflower

Broccoli

Summer squash (zucchini, crookneck)

Spaghetti squash

Mushrooms

Asparagus

Greenbeans

Cabbage

Sauerkraut

And of course lettuce and avocados which aren't a veggie but a

fruit .but they're definitely lowcarb. I have a large mixed lettuce

salad with avocado every night with dinner.

You can eat a reasonable portion (4-6 ounces) of meat, chicken, fish

without problem; it's all protein, no carbs.

Berries are the lowest carb fruit but even so, you should eat them very

sparingly. Here's the website of the USDA, which you'll find very

helpful. It has carbs, calories, protein, etc.

http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/cgi-bin/nut_search.pl

It's helpful to have a food scale. A cup measure isn't nearly so

accurate. I use a Salter scale. It weighs in both grams and ounces and

cost me somewhere around $35. I got mine at a local gourmet shop but

they're available online too. Just do a Google search for " Salter food

scales " .

The A1C is a test that measures your average BG for a three-month period

with slightly more weight given to the latest month. All diabetics

should have this test every three months. And you should ask for, and

keep, copies of all your lab reports.

Oh, here's a link to a site that explains some definitions of

diabetic terminology:

http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/P/Pancreas.html

Good luck. And keep those questions coming. There's a really steep

learning curve at the beginning of your diabetes education but hang in

there -- it will all make sense eventually. And remember -- the only

stupid question is the one you didn't ask.

Vicki, diabetic since 1997, A1Cs consistently under 6 for a long time,

no complications, planning on forever no complications,

smile.

Re: Intro

> Welcome, Bev. Too bad you had to find us, good that you did.

>

> --- bhelent rex_bevthoman@...> wrote:

>> Anyways my hubby was recently

>> diagnosed with diabetes and we're trying to get it under control, and

>> we have 2 teenage kids that I'm concerned about them getting it (they

>> eat far too much sugar).

>

> OK, but eating sugar isn't the whole problem, eating carbs (which

> includes all sugars) is more to

> the point. Besides which it's the build up of belly fat in a person

> that has the inherited

> predisposition to develop Type 2 diabetes that's the REAL problem. Of

> course too much food,

> particularly carbs may push your kids over the edge sometime.

>

> The changes we're making for my husband has

>> to be good for the whole family though.

>

> Very true.

>

>

> Ted Quick

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bev,

Did your husband take any steroidal drugs after the accident? They can

really elevate blood glucose levels.

Just a thought...

~a

In a message dated 12/12/2005 5:41:38 PM US Eastern Standard Time,

rex_bevthoman@... writes:

Thanks for the welcome Vicki and Ted,

Some of your comments bring up some of my concerns. My husband has

no family history of type 2, only a cousin with type 1, and he's

less that 0.1 % overweight according to BMI. He had a car accident

in June that his body just wasn't healing from that prompted his Dr

to run test " to see what's going on " . I've read a little about

LADA, and I wonder if that might be his case. Is that the same

thing as Type 1.5? Right now he's on Metformin and Avandia and the

BG's are still averaging 200. We have talked with his Dr. about

trying insulin, but for now we're sticking with the oral meds

because he's active duty Navy and if he goes on insulin it will

probably mean a medical discharge from the Navy, but once he reaches

the 18 year mark in his career (which is coming up in March) they

will let him finish his Navy career (even if he goes on insulin) at

20, which is a better career move. My concern is that if we don't

get these #'s down, is he going to have irreversible damage to some

internal organs? Personally I don't care a whole lot about his

career if that meens sacrificing his health, he can always get

another job, and even if he can't what good is it to retire from the

Navy and be on dialysis, a double amputee or dead?

Also in response to meters, my hubby has been using the Precision

Xtra since he was diagnosed, I guess it's an ok meter (of course we

haven't used any other), but we went to a Diabetes self management

class last week and the Diabetes Educator is helping us get through

some red tape to get a Onetouch Ultrasmart, with a cable to download

to the computer. She said that this thing is kind of like a palm

pilot and has software that you download that makes graphs and

charts. She said for a technically minded person like him it would

be a great tool to help him get control of his BG's (I hope it's as

great as she says). Bev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the welcome Vicki and Ted,

Some of your comments bring up some of my concerns. My husband has

no family history of type 2, only a cousin with type 1, and he's

less that 0.1 % overweight according to BMI. He had a car accident

in June that his body just wasn't healing from that prompted his Dr

to run test " to see what's going on " . I've read a little about

LADA, and I wonder if that might be his case. Is that the same

thing as Type 1.5? Right now he's on Metformin and Avandia and the

BG's are still averaging 200. We have talked with his Dr. about

trying insulin, but for now we're sticking with the oral meds

because he's active duty Navy and if he goes on insulin it will

probably mean a medical discharge from the Navy, but once he reaches

the 18 year mark in his career (which is coming up in March) they

will let him finish his Navy career (even if he goes on insulin) at

20, which is a better career move. My concern is that if we don't

get these #'s down, is he going to have irreversible damage to some

internal organs? Personally I don't care a whole lot about his

career if that meens sacrificing his health, he can always get

another job, and even if he can't what good is it to retire from the

Navy and be on dialysis, a double amputee or dead?

Also in response to meters, my hubby has been using the Precision

Xtra since he was diagnosed, I guess it's an ok meter (of course we

haven't used any other), but we went to a Diabetes self management

class last week and the Diabetes Educator is helping us get through

some red tape to get a Onetouch Ultrasmart, with a cable to download

to the computer. She said that this thing is kind of like a palm

pilot and has software that you download that makes graphs and

charts. She said for a technically minded person like him it would

be a great tool to help him get control of his BG's (I hope it's as

great as she says). Bev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 02:51 PM 12/12/05, bhelent wrote:

>thing as Type 1.5? Right now he's on Metformin and Avandia and the

>BG's are still averaging 200. We have talked with his Dr. about

>trying insulin, but for now we're sticking with the oral meds

>because he's active duty Navy and if he goes on insulin it will

>probably mean a medical discharge from the Navy, but once he reaches

>the 18 year mark in his career (which is coming up in March) they

>will let him finish his Navy career (even if he goes on insulin) at

>20, which is a better career move.

Odd thinking, that the better control of his diabetes he has the more

likely they are to discharge him. But of course we're talking military, and

they're as far if not further behind on their thinking about diabetes (as

well as other things...this spoken as a former Air Force wife) as most doctors.

You may have seen Vicki's " newby " letter already. It has loads of good

information. You will also learn about controlling BG by controlling how

many carbs you eat. The oral meds are fine, but not magical. Cutting back

on foods that are heavy in carbohydrates is, in my opinion, the key to

controlling Blood Glucose. This includes so-called " white carbs " such as

bread and potatoes (all types) and just about any grain or things made with

grain. Fruit is also high in carbs, as are corn, peas and winter squash. I

think it's a good idea to cut back on such things totally and then, when

BG's are where you want them, you can try adding small amounts of some of

them back (like a small serving of fruit) and check to see if they're

raising BG's too high.

>My concern is that if we don't

>get these #'s down, is he going to have irreversible damage to some

>internal organs?

Often there is some damage even before we're diagnosed. I understand,

however, that gaining good control can s-l-o-w-l-y cause reversal of some

of that. He should have had (or should have) a check of kidney function,

diabetic eye exam, test for PN, etc. to see where he is right now. You

didn't give us any information about what he eats (but if he's seen a

" diabetes educator " I'd be willing to bet that you've been told about the

ADA (American Diabetes Association) diet which most here feel is too high

in carbs) what his HbA1C blood test is (he should have had one done by now

and again every 3 months) and you should always get a copy of the results

of any lab work he has done), if he's exercising, etc. I'm sure some of

that info would help the experts here offer some meaningful suggestions.

>(snip)... She said for a technically minded person like him it would

>be a great tool to help him get control of his BG's (I hope it's as

>great as she says). Bev

But don't forget the glucometer is just what she said...a tool. IT doesn't

help you lower or control BG's but lets you know what your own efforts

produce in the way of BG results.

sky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> He had a car accident in June that his body just

> wasn't healing from that prompted his Dr

> to run test " to see what's going on " . ... Right

> now he's on Metformin and Avandia and the

> BG's are still averaging 200.

Metformin does not work very quickly, Bev. It took

me about a year to get down from HbA1c 13% to 5%

on metformin. The original safety report for metformin

gave 2 years as the design period for getting down to

below 7% so your husband has time.

> My concern is that if we don't get these #'s down,

> is he going to have irreversible damage to some

> internal organs? Personally I don't care a whole

> lot about his career if that meens sacrificing his

> health, he can always get another job, and even

> if he can't what good is it to retire from the Navy

> and be on dialysis, a double amputee or dead?

That does not happen very quickly, either. It could

take 20-30 years of total neglect to get into that

condition. He is getting treatment and is being

examined regularly so there is little chance that he

will get to the state of " irreversible damage " unnoticed.

His doctor should have established a baseline for his

eyes, kidneys, lower extremity nerves and heart by now.

If they are all still in good shape then you can reduce

your alert status from " red " to " orange " !

Anxiety is not a good basis for making diabetes

decisions, solid information is always a better bet!

I wish you a worry-free Christmas!

T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome, Bev.

Many people have found that ignoring the ADA diet(s) and cutting way

back on carbs is the best way to reduce BG numbers. My husband was

diagnosed in April of this year with an A1c of over 10. He is now on

only 500mg of Metformin (which I'm not sure has any effect). Because

we switched medicine I'm not sure what his A1c is now (it was 5.3 on

5mg Glyburide BID) but his 30-day average on his meter is 111 (and I

do test after meals as well as fasting and before meals).

My thought when he was diagnosed was you can't handle carbs, well,

DUH, don't eat them! So I wandered around on the web and found this

forum and the Bernstein forum for support and recipes. We had

support from his sister who remembered his mother on a low carb diet.

Because there is so much type 2 diabetes in their family she is on a

fairly low carb diet now herself, or at least a low glycemic diet, as

protection, even though tests show she is normal.

I find the ADA information totally unbelievable and most diabetic

cookbooks worthless. I understand they claim that heart disease is

the biggest problem of diabetics and hence they put diabetics on a low

fat and hence high carb diet. It just doesn't make sense to me (and

I'm a scientist and he's an engineer). Why don't they assume the

increased heart disease is due to the high blood glucose which

apparently most American diabetics suffer from due to this diet?

His mantra is " anything white " is poison, by which he means not only

sugar but also things like white flour and rice and potatoes. He is

not on an extremely low carb diet -- he eats about 90 to 100 grams of

carbs a day. His only grains are very carefully selected to be low

carb, very healthy and difficult to digest. Evening meals are meat,

low carb veggies, and a big vegetable salad. He does eat limited low

glycemic and low sugar fruits like apples. Snacks are often nuts or

half an apple and peanut butter. About half of his breakfasts are now

omelettes.

During the period your husband is getting under control he may need to

use a lot of test strips. Do the experiment and test his blood

glucose 1 hour after a meal. Then 2 hours. Learn what various foods

do to the blood sugar. It's easy to do.

We don't have a lot of trouble maintaining the diet and we have done

quite a bit of traveling and eating out as well. He's also lost

weight on this diet without trying.

Exercise is also supposed to be good and we were exercising, but

winter has arrived now so we need some new exercise program.

> Hi all, my name is Bev, I tried to introduce myself before, but it

> came back as undeliverable so forgive me if that one ends up going

> through and then this one also goes. Anyways my hubby was recently

> diagnosed with diabetes and we're trying to get it under control, and

> we have 2 teenage kids that I'm concerned about them getting it (they

> eat far too much sugar). The changes we're making for my husband has

> to be good for the whole family though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, now, I don't think it takes 30 or 40 years of poor control to

accumulate diabetic complications, . You can get them with as

little as 2 or 3 years of poor control. YMMV.

You'd be dead way before 30 or 40 years of poor control. Well, I guess

it can't make you dead if you're already there, smile.

But of course, it's not funny. And far too many people die of diabetes

related complications at an early age.

Vicki

Re: Intro

>

>

>> He had a car accident in June that his body just

>> wasn't healing from that prompted his Dr

>> to run test " to see what's going on " . ... Right

>> now he's on Metformin and Avandia and the

>> BG's are still averaging 200.

>

> Metformin does not work very quickly, Bev. It took

> me about a year to get down from HbA1c 13% to 5%

> on metformin. The original safety report for metformin

> gave 2 years as the design period for getting down to

> below 7% so your husband has time.

>

>> My concern is that if we don't get these #'s down,

>> is he going to have irreversible damage to some

>> internal organs? Personally I don't care a whole

>> lot about his career if that meens sacrificing his

>> health, he can always get another job, and even

>> if he can't what good is it to retire from the Navy

>> and be on dialysis, a double amputee or dead?

>

> That does not happen very quickly, either. It could

> take 20-30 years of total neglect to get into that

> condition. He is getting treatment and is being

> examined regularly so there is little chance that he

> will get to the state of " irreversible damage " unnoticed.

> His doctor should have established a baseline for his

> eyes, kidneys, lower extremity nerves and heart by now.

> If they are all still in good shape then you can reduce

> your alert status from " red " to " orange " !

>

> Anxiety is not a good basis for making diabetes

> decisions, solid information is always a better bet!

>

> I wish you a worry-free Christmas!

>

> T.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Metformin does not work very quickly, Bev. It took

> me about a year to get down from HbA1c 13% to 5%

> on metformin. The original safety report for metformin

> gave 2 years as the design period for getting down to

> below 7% so your husband has time

wow, is this true? If so, this is good to hear. I take 1000 mg

metformin twice a day, plus Actos. I have been feeling like I am

working so hard on keeping carbs to a minimum ala Bernstein and while I

have seen alot of improvement since I was diagnosed in July, I can't

seem to get my fasting under about 126 and between meals to about

105-115, with an occasional low of 100. Does your comment mean that

over time Metformin will kick in even more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> > Metformin does not work very quickly, Bev. It took

> > me about a year to get down from HbA1c 13% to 5%

> > on metformin. The original safety report for metformin

> > gave 2 years as the design period for getting down to

> > below 7% so your husband has time

>

> wow, is this true? If so, this is good to hear. I take 1000 mg

> metformin twice a day, plus Actos. I have been feeling like I am

> working so hard on keeping carbs to a minimum ala Bernstein and

while I

> have seen alot of improvement since I was diagnosed in July, I can't

> seem to get my fasting under about 126 and between meals to about

> 105-115, with an occasional low of 100. Does your comment mean that

> over time Metformin will kick in even more?

>

For what it is worth, I have been on 2000 mg metformin for about 15

years and to this day almost never have a fasting number less than

120.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, Hell. I guess as with everything else around Diabetes, YMMV.

Thanks for the reality check.(smile)

On Monday, December 12, 2005, at 09:07 PM, Rotramel wrote:

>

> For what it is worth, I have been on 2000 mg metformin for about 15

> years and to this day almost never have a fasting number less than

> 120.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Does your comment mean that

> over time Metformin will kick in even more?

I understand that it varies between individuals.

Some need to increase the dose as time goes by,

some are able to reduce it. Some whose kidneys

deteriorate have to go off it altogether. That is

one of the reasons why patients on metformin

should be monitored regularly for serum creatinine

clearance. The published figures are less

than 1.4 mg/dl for women and less than 1.5 mg/dl

for men to provide adequate kidney clearance of

metformin.

I am a long-term weight cycler and go up and down

from 165 lb to 205 lb in a 2-3 year period. At 165 lb

I manage on only 250 mg metformin/day, at 185 lb

I am on 500 mg/day and at 205 lb I have to increase

to 1000mg/day. Doing this, I have been able to hold

a pretty constant HbA1c of 5.5% for 6 years now.

I have different sets of pants for the different

weights and I can correlate my pants size with my

metformin dose: pants too tight, time to increase

the dose; pants too loose, time to cut back again!

My private explanation for this is that metformin

works on the liver and the more abdominal fat I

have, the less metformin actually gets to my liver

(the same principle as insulin resistance).

Regards

T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Well, now, I don't think it takes 30 or 40

> years of poor control to accumulate diabetic

> complications, . You can get them with as

> little as 2 or 3 years of poor control. YMMV.

> You'd be dead way before 30 or 40 years of poor

> control.

I didn't write anything about " 30 or 40 years of

poor control " , I wrote " 20-30 years of total

neglect " ! And we weren't discussing " getting "

complications but of progressing to the stage

at which dialysis, double amputation or death

results. Do you have any figures on how many

diabetics under regular treatment get to that

state in 2-3 years from onset, especially the

ones with an alert wife monitoring progress?

I don't believe in exaggerating the rate of

progression just to scare people, that gets them

into the condition at which they are frightened

to eat a slice of Christmas cake for fear that

their legs will get cut off. This thing is not

to be taken lightly, that's for sure, but from

Bev's description of the treatment her husband

is getting, I felt that she sounded much more

anxious than the circumstances warranted.

> And far too many people die of diabetes

> related complications at an early age.

Sure, any death at an early age from anything is

one too many, but do you have any statistics to

support that statement, Vicki? Didn't we discuss

this once before? You might remember that I did

look for some figures and found that there are

not very many available.

That appeared to me to be be because diabetes

is very seldom given as the cause of death on

death certificates. The physician might give

" hemorrhagic stroke as a consequence of breast

cancer " as the cause of death but very seldom

takes the trouble to decide whether the condition

was aggravated by diabetes or not, far less give

his opinion on the degree of BG control, any

more than he would write on the death certificate

that the condition had been aggravated by taking

3 hours to get the patient into a hospital, for

example. What other source could there be for

such statistics other than death certificates?

But I know that this is in your professional

area, Vicki, and I am wondering if you have come

across some solid data in the mean time?

Regards

T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Guest guest

Welcome Martha

I'm sorry you have to be here, but it's a great group.

/Mi

Intro

My name is Martha, I was recently diagnosed (last monday actually lol)

but have been more or less home bound since october when this flare

started. I was a 911 operator for the last 9 years but am currently in

the process of filing a disability claim.

I am a practicing Wiccan and mom to 4 dogs, 8 cats and 4 rats . I'm

also in the process of starting a business that I can work from home so

I don't have to stay on disability :) ... guess that's about it for now.

I look forward to getting to know y'all.

Martha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...