Guest guest Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 michelle a shout out to our sarah dr on here lol as for me well ive had many disagree way to many with different stuff but weve stuck at it and they belie ve me ive even had people disagree bout wat im doing but i still am lol ellen kinda bored its only girls at northcot so no normal prorams three people one does nothing so wat u expect me to to do emails right now an ip goal is to puncuate better in emails so mark me on this one pls lol > > We had an eye exam and growth check with endocrinology today. Aubrie is > doing well in both areas. > > The resident ophthalmologist mentioned the droopiness of her right eye lid > - > which is her good eye. This is a guy who has never seen her so I don't > know > if this has always been the same and just never been mentioned or if it's > actually gotten worse. No one's ever said anything before. Basically, the > lid is drooping enough to get in the way of her vision a bit. She is > compensating by raising her eyebrows or tilting her head up. She's always > tilted her head, but I don't know if it's increased lately or not. It > could > be one of those things that creeps up over time without our awareness. So > no big deal - just a new thing to know about, I guess. Surgery is an > option > but only if it gets so bad that she can't compensate adequately on her own > - > since surgery brings its own set of consequences like a lid that can't > close > well for sleep (not a current problem). > > The " real " eye dr asked about the support she's getting at school. I > mentioned the long white cane and he was adamant that it was unnecessary > because she has such good acuity in her good eye. I didn't continue the > conversation. I plan to confirm with her O&M and vision specialists that > they think it's appropriate. When I told Aubrie that the dr didn't think > it > was needed, she said, " But it's really not his decision. I think it's > helpful. " So there. > > It's always uncomfortable when a specialist disagrees with us. We had a > similar experience with the ENT who did her middle ear and BAHA surgeries. > I adore him. But he doesn't think ISD is an appropriate placement because > her hearing isn't bad enough. Well, from a medical point of view, based > solely on her audiogram, maybe it's not an obvious choice. But my guess is > he's never visited a deaf school and doesn't really understand the > complexities of educating a child with mulitsensory impairments. I'm > thinking this comment by the eye dr is similar. Based solely on the acuity > of her best eye, she wouldn't need a cane. In fact, she might be able to > drive if that were her only problem. Again, I don't think he understands > the implications of all her vision issues combined with her hearing, > balance, etc. > > Another eye thing that's got me wondering - how do they really check > distance vision??? The eye chart is only so far away. Aubrie can see to a > certain distance. But she loses it after that. When we are at an event, we > need to be right up front or she can't get what's going on. She can't > usually see well out of the car window. Maybe it's a problem with focus or > something. It may have nothing to do with acuity, but she's definitely got > issues with distance. And, of course, there are issues with depth > perception since she's only got one eye doing a good job. > > Ok - so - enough of the eye ponderings. > > Moving on to growth - she's following the curve between 5-10%ile. Very > awesome considering it took her years to get on the curve! She's outgrown > clothes like crazy this year, is starting to have a bit of a belly, and > even > has some muscles in her thighs! The dr said she very well could be growth > hormone deficient but is doing well enough because she has tall parents. > Even though she is always the smallest one in her age group, Aubrie > doesn't > mind her size at all. In fact, it's a good thing right now since it sort > of > fits with her motor skill maturity. So the dr doesn't think it's time to > consider GHT. But I know there are benefits to GHT besides the actual > growth. There are also disadvantages and side-effects. I'm fine with not > pursuing it now. But I'm interested in any opinions from those of you with > experience just to be sure we're doing the right thing by not doing > anything. I also plan to run it by Kirk at the conference. Any > thoughts? > > Thanks! > > Michele W > Aubrie's mom 9 yrs > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 Michele, this is another one of those nights when I probably shouldn't be writing (haven't recovered from rushing Andy to the e.r. on Sunday [he's fine - apparently wasn't drinking enough water in the heat] and today, at rehab, one of my co-captives collapsed --- and I have been a wreck). Enough about me. I am 5'9 1/2 " tall, and decidedly takes after my side of the family. Several years ago, I said to Sandy Davenport that couldn't have CHARGE because she'd gotten so tall; Dr. D. had to remind me about my family's height. Genes matter in so many ways! Anyway, it's hard to believe it now when I look at , but she was small for many years. We didn't use ght probably because no one mentioned it way back when. I don't know when she took off growing, but she must be at least 5'6 " now (Pam might have a better idea; I'm too close). In her case, ignorant parents were a good thing. Mind you, hormonal therapy for development was another issue. I know you've had experience with St. Louis Childrens. That's where all of 's early opth. work was done. The purely objective work-ups showed her sight was just awful. A neuro-ophth finally did a test when she was still tiny; as another dr. said after the test, " I see what Mitch means when he says he sees the macula " . In other words, was doing things others didn't think possible. Also at Childrens, we had NO help at all with educational issues with regard to deafness. Someone should have mentioned sign languag to us from the beginning, but that waited many years. It was as though even the audiologists did not recognize the overpowering need for a trusty communication mode. The specialists definitely aren't always thinking in real life terms. Enough of my soap box. Hugs --- Martha ---------------------- Original Message: --------------------- To: CHARGE > Subject: Eye and Endocrinology appt results Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:13:47 +0000 > We had an eye exam and growth check with endocrinology today. Aubrie is > doing well in both areas. > > > > The resident ophthalmologist mentioned the droopiness of her right eye lid - > which is her good eye. This is a guy who has never seen her so I don't know > if this has always been the same and just never been mentioned or if it's > actually gotten worse. No one's ever said anything before. Basically, the > lid is drooping enough to get in the way of her vision a bit. She is > compensating by raising her eyebrows or tilting her head up. She's always > tilted her head, but I don't know if it's increased lately or not. It could > be one of those things that creeps up over time without our awareness. So > no big deal - just a new thing to know about, I guess. Surgery is an option > but only if it gets so bad that she can't compensate adequately on her own - > since surgery brings its own set of consequences like a lid that can't close > well for sleep (not a current problem). > > > > The " real " eye dr asked about the support she's getting at school. I > mentioned the long white cane and he was adamant that it was unnecessary > because she has such good acuity in her good eye. I didn't continue the > conversation. I plan to confirm with her O & M and vision specialists that > they think it's appropriate. When I told Aubrie that the dr didn't think it > was needed, she said, " But it's really not his decision. I think it's > helpful. " So there. > > It's always uncomfortable when a specialist disagrees with us. We had a > similar experience with the ENT who did her middle ear and BAHA surgeries. > I adore him. But he doesn't think ISD is an appropriate placement because > her hearing isn't bad enough. Well, from a medical point of view, based > solely on her audiogram, maybe it's not an obvious choice. But my guess is > he's never visited a deaf school and doesn't really understand the > complexities of educating a child with mulitsensory impairments. I'm > thinking this comment by the eye dr is similar. Based solely on the acuity > of her best eye, she wouldn't need a cane. In fact, she might be able to > drive if that were her only problem. Again, I don't think he understands > the implications of all her vision issues combined with her hearing, > balance, etc. > > > > Another eye thing that's got me wondering - how do they really check > distance vision??? The eye chart is only so far away. Aubrie can see to a > certain distance. But she loses it after that. When we are at an event, we > need to be right up front or she can't get what's going on. She can't > usually see well out of the car window. Maybe it's a problem with focus or > something. It may have nothing to do with acuity, but she's definitely got > issues with distance. And, of course, there are issues with depth > perception since she's only got one eye doing a good job. > > > > Ok - so - enough of the eye ponderings. > > > > Moving on to growth - she's following the curve between 5-10%ile. Very > awesome considering it took her years to get on the curve! She's outgrown > clothes like crazy this year, is starting to have a bit of a belly, and even > has some muscles in her thighs! The dr said she very well could be growth > hormone deficient but is doing well enough because she has tall parents. > Even though she is always the smallest one in her age group, Aubrie doesn't > mind her size at all. In fact, it's a good thing right now since it sort of > fits with her motor skill maturity. So the dr doesn't think it's time to > consider GHT. But I know there are benefits to GHT besides the actual > growth. There are also disadvantages and side-effects. I'm fine with not > pursuing it now. But I'm interested in any opinions from those of you with > experience just to be sure we're doing the right thing by not doing > anything. I also plan to run it by Kirk at the conference. Any > thoughts? > > > > Thanks! > > Michele W > Aubrie's mom 9 yrs > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 Michele, In regard to wondering if the drooping eyelid was something new or not, I'm wondering if you might get an answer by looking back over old photos. What might not have seemed apparent day to day might have actually shown up in a photo. It may have always been that way. Or, it's possible you would notice that all of a sudden, when she was --- years old, you could see a droopiness in the eyelid. It's just a thought. Also, I wanted to say how wonderful the ad with Aubrie was. WOW! What a sweet, sweet, little darling. Mom to Kendra Eye and Endocrinology appt results We had an eye exam and growth check with endocrinology today. Aubrie is doing well in both areas. The resident ophthalmologist mentioned the droopiness of her right eye lid - which is her good eye. This is a guy who has never seen her so I don't know if this has always been the same and just never been mentioned or if it's actually gotten worse. No one's ever said anything before. Basically, the lid is drooping enough to get in the way of her vision a bit. She is compensating by raising her eyebrows or tilting her head up. She's always tilted her head, but I don't know if it's increased lately or not. It could be one of those things that creeps up over time without our awareness. So no big deal - just a new thing to know about, I guess. Surgery is an option but only if it gets so bad that she can't compensate adequately on her own - since surgery brings its own set of consequences like a lid that can't close well for sleep (not a current problem). The " real " eye dr asked about the support she's getting at school. I mentioned the long white cane and he was adamant that it was unnecessary because she has such good acuity in her good eye. I didn't continue the conversation. I plan to confirm with her O&M and vision specialists that they think it's appropriate. When I told Aubrie that the dr didn't think it was needed, she said, " But it's really not his decision. I think it's helpful. " So there. It's always uncomfortable when a specialist disagrees with us. We had a similar experience with the ENT who did her middle ear and BAHA surgeries. I adore him. But he doesn't think ISD is an appropriate placement because her hearing isn't bad enough. Well, from a medical point of view, based solely on her audiogram, maybe it's not an obvious choice. But my guess is he's never visited a deaf school and doesn't really understand the complexities of educating a child with mulitsensory impairments. I'm thinking this comment by the eye dr is similar. Based solely on the acuity of her best eye, she wouldn't need a cane. In fact, she might be able to drive if that were her only problem. Again, I don't think he understands the implications of all her vision issues combined with her hearing, balance, etc. Another eye thing that's got me wondering - how do they really check distance vision??? The eye chart is only so far away. Aubrie can see to a certain distance. But she loses it after that. When we are at an event, we need to be right up front or she can't get what's going on. She can't usually see well out of the car window. Maybe it's a problem with focus or something. It may have nothing to do with acuity, but she's definitely got issues with distance. And, of course, there are issues with depth perception since she's only got one eye doing a good job. Ok - so - enough of the eye ponderings. Moving on to growth - she's following the curve between 5-10%ile. Very awesome considering it took her years to get on the curve! She's outgrown clothes like crazy this year, is starting to have a bit of a belly, and even has some muscles in her thighs! The dr said she very well could be growth hormone deficient but is doing well enough because she has tall parents. Even though she is always the smallest one in her age group, Aubrie doesn't mind her size at all. In fact, it's a good thing right now since it sort of fits with her motor skill maturity. So the dr doesn't think it's time to consider GHT. But I know there are benefits to GHT besides the actual growth. There are also disadvantages and side-effects. I'm fine with not pursuing it now. But I'm interested in any opinions from those of you with experience just to be sure we're doing the right thing by not doing anything. I also plan to run it by Kirk at the conference. Any thoughts? Thanks! Michele W Aubrie's mom 9 yrs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Michele, Just some random comments here. On the cane. He's missing the hearing, balance, strength complications, certainly. Besides that, as we've said before, the cane is as much to cue those around the kids, as for the kids themselves. Same with the deaf school. But, these experiences you've had point again to the fact that doctors become so specialized that they see the tree and still miss the forest. The advice you received is very inappropriate in terms of multisensory/physical complications, to the point that I wish they'd learn to stay quiet on subjects they do not understand. Imagine if you followed their advice. I like Aubrie's answer. (so there!, as she says) On growth hormone-we did not go that route. was full-term 7.0 lbs. dropped below 5 lbs at one point in hospital. she grew slowly, but was 5'1 " at 16, and 5'2 " by 19 years. GH can accelerate the scoliosis, I believe. is on HRT, and we were told that would halt the growing process, if there was to be any more, but we still got that one more inch. Re distance vision. Di really loses it at 3 ft. but says she can see airplanes in the sky. As far as I know, that info is all experiential. Seeing things from a moving car has come on a bit as she's aged. That's our little blurb of experience. linda in Ma. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Michele, it is uncomfortable when you disagree (been there, done that oh yeah) but I usually just say something like, " thank you for your input " - every decision is ultimately the family's in my opinion...good for you for considering Aubrie as a WHOLE child, not just this part or that part. We got into that with our GI surgery early on - they wanted to do what was best just looking at her gut and not the rest of her, I wanted to do what was best for the WHOLE person. Lis > > We had an eye exam and growth check with endocrinology today. Aubrie is > doing well in both areas. > > The resident ophthalmologist mentioned the droopiness of her right eye lid > - > which is her good eye. This is a guy who has never seen her so I don't > know > if this has always been the same and just never been mentioned or if it's > actually gotten worse. No one's ever said anything before. Basically, the > lid is drooping enough to get in the way of her vision a bit. She is > compensating by raising her eyebrows or tilting her head up. She's always > tilted her head, but I don't know if it's increased lately or not. It > could > be one of those things that creeps up over time without our awareness. So > no big deal - just a new thing to know about, I guess. Surgery is an > option > but only if it gets so bad that she can't compensate adequately on her own > - > since surgery brings its own set of consequences like a lid that can't > close > well for sleep (not a current problem). > > The " real " eye dr asked about the support she's getting at school. I > mentioned the long white cane and he was adamant that it was unnecessary > because she has such good acuity in her good eye. I didn't continue the > conversation. I plan to confirm with her O&M and vision specialists that > they think it's appropriate. When I told Aubrie that the dr didn't think > it > was needed, she said, " But it's really not his decision. I think it's > helpful. " So there. > > It's always uncomfortable when a specialist disagrees with us. We had a > similar experience with the ENT who did her middle ear and BAHA surgeries. > I adore him. But he doesn't think ISD is an appropriate placement because > her hearing isn't bad enough. Well, from a medical point of view, based > solely on her audiogram, maybe it's not an obvious choice. But my guess is > he's never visited a deaf school and doesn't really understand the > complexities of educating a child with mulitsensory impairments. I'm > thinking this comment by the eye dr is similar. Based solely on the acuity > of her best eye, she wouldn't need a cane. In fact, she might be able to > drive if that were her only problem. Again, I don't think he understands > the implications of all her vision issues combined with her hearing, > balance, etc. > > Another eye thing that's got me wondering - how do they really check > distance vision??? The eye chart is only so far away. Aubrie can see to a > certain distance. But she loses it after that. When we are at an event, we > need to be right up front or she can't get what's going on. She can't > usually see well out of the car window. Maybe it's a problem with focus or > something. It may have nothing to do with acuity, but she's definitely got > issues with distance. And, of course, there are issues with depth > perception since she's only got one eye doing a good job. > > Ok - so - enough of the eye ponderings. > > Moving on to growth - she's following the curve between 5-10%ile. Very > awesome considering it took her years to get on the curve! She's outgrown > clothes like crazy this year, is starting to have a bit of a belly, and > even > has some muscles in her thighs! The dr said she very well could be growth > hormone deficient but is doing well enough because she has tall parents. > Even though she is always the smallest one in her age group, Aubrie > doesn't > mind her size at all. In fact, it's a good thing right now since it sort > of > fits with her motor skill maturity. So the dr doesn't think it's time to > consider GHT. But I know there are benefits to GHT besides the actual > growth. There are also disadvantages and side-effects. I'm fine with not > pursuing it now. But I'm interested in any opinions from those of you with > experience just to be sure we're doing the right thing by not doing > anything. I also plan to run it by Kirk at the conference. Any > thoughts? > > Thanks! > > Michele W > Aubrie's mom 9 yrs > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 , Amita is on the other side of the issues you mentioned but with the exact same problems i.e vision, hearing etc. She does not use a cane and she is fully mainstreamed. She is very small not even on the growth curve but then we are petite too. As to the cane, if Aubrie wants it and she is saying that it is helpful you should absolutely go with what she says. In fact for Amita, I am going to have the O and M come back for a session and teach her how to use it (At the next ARD). I want Amita to have the choice and make her own decision. Hey as an aside; when Amita was younger and could not communicate clearly we used sign language. Her ECI teacher said that she would drop it if and when she could communicate effectively through speaking orally and Amita did gradually stop signing. The point is that both Amita and Aubrie should have the choice so they can then make an informed decision. As to mainstreaming, Amita was mainstreamed completely last year. She has all the adaptations etc for her to learn effectively in her new school. I have to say, this move would not have been successful if not for support from everyone in the new school. Her class teacher was AWESOME!! Everyone welcomed her and tried to help me in every way they could. The workload is more, there are 17 children in her class.It is very hard because it takes more concentration more work just to keep up so she is somewhere in the middle of her class in terms of learning. There are frustrations like when the video streaming does not have captioning or she does not hear stuff and misses out. But we try to make it up at home and try to find a solution in the ARD like for e.g I asked for permission to access videostreaming content from home for the next year. If it gets too hard and she starts to struggle too much then we will reassess her placement.But so far she is keeping up. Amita's endo wants to wait also kind of for the same reasons your doc also gave. She is the head of endo here and is supposed to be very good. Super long email, hope it helped Deepta > > We had an eye exam and growth check with endocrinology today. Aubrie is > doing well in both areas. > > > > The resident ophthalmologist mentioned the droopiness of her right eye lid - > which is her good eye. This is a guy who has never seen her so I don't know > if this has always been the same and just never been mentioned or if it's > actually gotten worse. No one's ever said anything before. Basically, the > lid is drooping enough to get in the way of her vision a bit. She is > compensating by raising her eyebrows or tilting her head up. She's always > tilted her head, but I don't know if it's increased lately or not. It could > be one of those things that creeps up over time without our awareness. So > no big deal - just a new thing to know about, I guess. Surgery is an option > but only if it gets so bad that she can't compensate adequately on her own - > since surgery brings its own set of consequences like a lid that can't close > well for sleep (not a current problem). > > > > The " real " eye dr asked about the support she's getting at school. I > mentioned the long white cane and he was adamant that it was unnecessary > because she has such good acuity in her good eye. I didn't continue the > conversation. I plan to confirm with her O&M and vision specialists that > they think it's appropriate. When I told Aubrie that the dr didn't think it > was needed, she said, " But it's really not his decision. I think it's > helpful. " So there. > > It's always uncomfortable when a specialist disagrees with us. We had a > similar experience with the ENT who did her middle ear and BAHA surgeries. > I adore him. But he doesn't think ISD is an appropriate placement because > her hearing isn't bad enough. Well, from a medical point of view, based > solely on her audiogram, maybe it's not an obvious choice. But my guess is > he's never visited a deaf school and doesn't really understand the > complexities of educating a child with mulitsensory impairments. I'm > thinking this comment by the eye dr is similar. Based solely on the acuity > of her best eye, she wouldn't need a cane. In fact, she might be able to > drive if that were her only problem. Again, I don't think he understands > the implications of all her vision issues combined with her hearing, > balance, etc. > > > > Another eye thing that's got me wondering - how do they really check > distance vision??? The eye chart is only so far away. Aubrie can see to a > certain distance. But she loses it after that. When we are at an event, we > need to be right up front or she can't get what's going on. She can't > usually see well out of the car window. Maybe it's a problem with focus or > something. It may have nothing to do with acuity, but she's definitely got > issues with distance. And, of course, there are issues with depth > perception since she's only got one eye doing a good job. > > > > Ok - so - enough of the eye ponderings. > > > > Moving on to growth - she's following the curve between 5-10%ile. Very > awesome considering it took her years to get on the curve! She's outgrown > clothes like crazy this year, is starting to have a bit of a belly, and even > has some muscles in her thighs! The dr said she very well could be growth > hormone deficient but is doing well enough because she has tall parents. > Even though she is always the smallest one in her age group, Aubrie doesn't > mind her size at all. In fact, it's a good thing right now since it sort of > fits with her motor skill maturity. So the dr doesn't think it's time to > consider GHT. But I know there are benefits to GHT besides the actual > growth. There are also disadvantages and side-effects. I'm fine with not > pursuing it now. But I'm interested in any opinions from those of you with > experience just to be sure we're doing the right thing by not doing > anything. I also plan to run it by Kirk at the conference. Any > thoughts? > > > > Thanks! > > Michele W > Aubrie's mom 9 yrs > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Michele, Obviously your instincts are correct. Neither of these professionals are looking at the whole picture. Try not to second guess yourself. About the eyelid thing. MacKenzie has severe issues with her right eyelid, only the opposite of Aubrie, hers doesn't close well. We see an Occular Plastic surgeon, who keeps very detailed measurements and photos. I don't think this is a decision for an Ophthalmologist. Mac has had several procedures done and will need several more to preserve the sight in that eye. Jeanie Oh yeah, I've been divorced for almost 7 years now and it's been a saga worthy of a Dr.Phil show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Ellen- I used to be a teacher so asking me to mark you is a dangerous request! I am wicked with a red pencil! Michele W _____ From: CHARGE [mailto:CHARGE ] On Behalf Of ellen howe Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 10:59 PM To: CHARGE Subject: Re: Eye and Endocrinology appt results michelle a shout out to our sarah dr on here lol as for me well ive had many disagree way to many with different stuff but weve stuck at it and they belie ve me ive even had people disagree bout wat im doing but i still am lol ellen kinda bored its only girls at northcot so no normal prorams three people one does nothing so wat u expect me to to do emails right now an ip goal is to puncuate better in emails so mark me on this one pls lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Martha- First of all, I hope today brings better things your way! Thanks for confirming the thoughts about medical specialists not always understanding the real life implications of things. I've had the pleasure of meeting so I know how tall she is! I hadn't thought about Aubrie having a spurt and truly getting tall. Her paternal grandmother is petite so we just focus on the possibility that she'll be petite like Mimi and able to wear the wedding dress she's saved for the granddaughters. Take care and relax a bit! Michele W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 - Thanks for the suggestion. I had thought about that as well. When I just go back through my memory, she always tilted way back for photos. It was one of those situations where she tilted when given the " smile " command. I think because her " picture smile " was actually a goofy expression that pulled her eyebrows down. When told to relax and give a " happy smile " , she would put her head more level. Interesting. Michele W _____ From: CHARGE [mailto:CHARGE ] On Behalf Of Keedy Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 12:23 AM To: CHARGE Subject: Re: Eye and Endocrinology appt results Michele, In regard to wondering if the drooping eyelid was something new or not, I'm wondering if you might get an answer by looking back over old photos. What might not have seemed apparent day to day might have actually shown up in a photo. It may have always been that way. Or, it's possible you would notice that all of a sudden, when she was --- years old, you could see a droopiness in the eyelid. It's just a thought. Also, I wanted to say how wonderful the ad with Aubrie was. WOW! What a sweet, sweet, little darling. Mom to Kendra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 - At least your experience with Di mimics mine with Aubrie so I feel validated. I wasn't letting the dr comments get under my skin as I'm fairly confident in our current choices. But it is worrisome for other parents who would listen and get no further input. Argh. Michele W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 - This is a difficult lesson to learn as a parent - that it's ok, even necessary, to question dr opinions. Maybe another good column topic since it's so critical for our kids' success! Michele _____ From: CHARGE [mailto:CHARGE ] On Behalf Of Weir Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 7:05 AM To: CHARGE Subject: Re: Eye and Endocrinology appt results Michele, it is uncomfortable when you disagree (been there, done that oh yeah) but I usually just say something like, " thank you for your input " - every decision is ultimately the family's in my opinion...good for you for considering Aubrie as a WHOLE child, not just this part or that part. We got into that with our GI surgery early on - they wanted to do what was best just looking at her gut and not the rest of her, I wanted to do what was best for the WHOLE person. Lis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Deepta- Thanks for all your experiences. I'm especially interested in Amita's school experience. It's wonderful that you've found a team to support her in the regular classroom - and she's being so successful!!!!!!! Aubrie will be in the regular class for the afternoon's next year. Her team is fabulous, but I still worry about it. It's not that I think they don't want to do well, I just wonder if we've got all the knowledge, skills, and tools we need to do well for Aubrie. That's why we're doing half and half placement (ISD and regular school). It will give us a chance to see how she does in each setting. When and if one becomes apparently the " best " , we can switch to full-time there. We did sign in infancy also for the same reasons - to provide a way to communicate before she had speech and to give a choice. Same reason she's at ISD this year - she gets all the info in many formats so she can " get it " one way or another. She is thriving there academically. She seems to learn so well in a smaller classroom and with multimodal teaching. However, I think their curriculum is slightly different so I worry about what she is missing. By going half and half, she'll be exposed to more. We'll see how it goes. The real point of all of that was to commend you on Amita's success in school. I remember from your posts through out the year how much time you have invested in working with her at home. Michele W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Jeanie- Thanks for the confirmation! I hope the saga has settled down to allow you a contented life on your own. Michele _____ From: CHARGE [mailto:CHARGE ] On Behalf Of Jeanie Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:21 AM To: CHARGE Subject: Re: Eye and Endocrinology appt results Michele, Obviously your instincts are correct. Neither of these professionals are looking at the whole picture. Try not to second guess yourself. About the eyelid thing. MacKenzie has severe issues with her right eyelid, only the opposite of Aubrie, hers doesn't close well. We see an Occular Plastic surgeon, who keeps very detailed measurements and photos. I don't think this is a decision for an Ophthalmologist. Mac has had several procedures done and will need several more to preserve the sight in that eye. Jeanie Oh yeah, I've been divorced for almost 7 years now and it's been a saga worthy of a Dr.Phil show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Jeanie, " a " Dr. Phil show? L > > Michele, > > Obviously your instincts are correct. Neither of these professionals are > looking at the whole picture. Try not to second guess yourself. > > About the eyelid thing. MacKenzie has severe issues with her right eyelid, > only the opposite of Aubrie, hers doesn't close well. We see an Occular > Plastic surgeon, who keeps very detailed measurements and photos. I don't > think this is a decision for an Ophthalmologist. > Mac has had several procedures done and will need several more to preserve > the sight in that eye. > > Jeanie > > Oh yeah, I've been divorced for almost 7 years now and it's been a saga > worthy of a Dr.Phil show. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Excellent column idea - we've grown up with the notion that doctors are " gods " and unfortunately I think sometimes parents go against their own instincts because they feel they aren't " allowed " to question doctors. L > > - > > This is a difficult lesson to learn as a parent - that it's ok, even > necessary, to question dr opinions. Maybe another good column topic since > it's so critical for our kids' success! > > Michele > > _____ > > From: CHARGE [mailto: > CHARGE ] On Behalf Of > Weir > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 7:05 AM > To: CHARGE > Subject: Re: Eye and Endocrinology appt results > > Michele, it is uncomfortable when you disagree (been there, done that oh > yeah) but I usually just say something like, " thank you for your input " - > every decision is ultimately the family's in my opinion...good for you for > considering Aubrie as a WHOLE child, not just this part or that part. We > got into that with our GI surgery early on - they wanted to do what was > best > just looking at her gut and not the rest of her, I wanted to do what was > best for the WHOLE person. > > Lis > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 I know what you mean. I have the exact same worry for Amita. If she has a " lesser " curriculum, I worry about what she is missing out on and how it may impact her later on. As it is we have some kind of student level based teaching going on. For e.g. kids are divided into groups based on their reading and math skills (which is tested 3 times/yr). The knowledge they are exposed to is based on their skill level. This helps the teacher to tailor her teaching to the students in each group. I worry about further limiting her knowledge if I impose further restrictions. FYI I swing back and forth in my opinion on this topic and drive my husband crazy. I guess there is no right answer. What works for our kids is what should be implemented by us!! However that doesn't stop me from worrying when I see that 2nd graders are supposed to do like 75!!! addition problems in 1 min and God know how many subtractions by the time they enter 3rd grade!!!!And don't get me started on the word problems!!!I find them hard and I have a Ph.D.)) Deepta > > Deepta- > > Thanks for all your experiences. I'm especially interested in Amita's > school experience. It's wonderful that you've found a team to support her > in the regular classroom - and she's being so successful!!!!!!! Aubrie will > be in the regular class for the afternoon's next year. Her team is > fabulous, but I still worry about it. It's not that I think they don't want > to do well, I just wonder if we've got all the knowledge, skills, and tools > we need to do well for Aubrie. That's why we're doing half and half > placement (ISD and regular school). It will give us a chance to see how she > does in each setting. When and if one becomes apparently the " best " , we can > switch to full-time there. > > > > We did sign in infancy also for the same reasons - to provide a way to > communicate before she had speech and to give a choice. Same reason she's > at ISD this year - she gets all the info in many formats so she can " get it " > one way or another. She is thriving there academically. She seems to learn > so well in a smaller classroom and with multimodal teaching. However, I > think their curriculum is slightly different so I worry about what she is > missing. By going half and half, she'll be exposed to more. We'll see how > it goes. > > > > The real point of all of that was to commend you on Amita's success in > school. I remember from your posts through out the year how much time you > have invested in working with her at home. > > > > Michele W > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 , Maybe Jerry Springer would be more appropriate. Jeanie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Michele, I am so glad I caught this post. Aubrie's comment about it not really being the doctor's decision if she uses a cane or not is AWESOME! She is such a wise one. And you are wise too. Using the cane, her troubles with distance vision etc. are not reated to her acuity. There are so many more visual functions involved! From his perspective he is right, she doesn't need it. But from yours and Aubrie when you see the full impact of all of her sensory impairments, you know she does! Do not doubt yourself! Kim > > > > > > > We had an eye exam and growth check with endocrinology today. Aubrie is > doing well in both areas. > > The resident ophthalmologist mentioned the droopiness of her right eye lid > - > which is her good eye. This is a guy who has never seen her so I don't know > if this has always been the same and just never been mentioned or if it's > actually gotten worse. No one's ever said anything before. Basically, the > lid is drooping enough to get in the way of her vision a bit. She is > compensating by raising her eyebrows or tilting her head up. She's always > tilted her head, but I don't know if it's increased lately or not. It could > be one of those things that creeps up over time without our awareness. So > no big deal - just a new thing to know about, I guess. Surgery is an option > but only if it gets so bad that she can't compensate adequately on her own > - > since surgery brings its own set of consequences like a lid that can't > close > well for sleep (not a current problem). > > The " real " eye dr asked about the support she's getting at school. I > mentioned the long white cane and he was adamant that it was unnecessary > because she has such good acuity in her good eye. I didn't continue the > conversation. I plan to confirm with her O&M and vision specialists that > they think it's appropriate. When I told Aubrie that the dr didn't think it > was needed, she said, " But it's really not his decision. I think it's > helpful. " So there. > > It's always uncomfortable when a specialist disagrees with us. We had a > similar experience with the ENT who did her middle ear and BAHA surgeries. > I adore him. But he doesn't think ISD is an appropriate placement because > her hearing isn't bad enough. Well, from a medical point of view, based > solely on her audiogram, maybe it's not an obvious choice. But my guess is > he's never visited a deaf school and doesn't really understand the > complexities of educating a child with mulitsensory impairments. I'm > thinking this comment by the eye dr is similar. Based solely on the acuity > of her best eye, she wouldn't need a cane. In fact, she might be able to > drive if that were her only problem. Again, I don't think he understands > the implications of all her vision issues combined with her hearing, > balance, etc. > > Another eye thing that's got me wondering - how do they really check > distance vision??? The eye chart is only so far away. Aubrie can see to a > certain distance. But she loses it after that. When we are at an event, we > need to be right up front or she can't get what's going on. She can't > usually see well out of the car window. Maybe it's a problem with focus or > something. It may have nothing to do with acuity, but she's definitely got > issues with distance. And, of course, there are issues with depth > perception since she's only got one eye doing a good job. > > Ok - so - enough of the eye ponderings. > > Moving on to growth - she's following the curve between 5-10%ile. Very > awesome considering it took her years to get on the curve! She's outgrown > clothes like crazy this year, is starting to have a bit of a belly, and > even > has some muscles in her thighs! The dr said she very well could be growth > hormone deficient but is doing well enough because she has tall parents. > Even though she is always the smallest one in her age group, Aubrie doesn't > mind her size at all. In fact, it's a good thing right now since it sort of > fits with her motor skill maturity. So the dr doesn't think it's time to > consider GHT. But I know there are benefits to GHT besides the actual > growth. There are also disadvantages and side-effects. I'm fine with not > pursuing it now. But I'm interested in any opinions from those of you with > experience just to be sure we're doing the right thing by not doing > anything. I also plan to run it by Kirk at the conference. Any > thoughts? > > Thanks! > > Michele W > Aubrie's mom 9 yrs > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 Kim- I've been meaning to say how very glad I am that you are back online with us! You've been so missed!! Michele W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.