Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 also has facial palsy on left side. Her face is asymetrical. She has no vision in the left eye, and the whole eye is smaller. She can close the eye, but she'll rub it too much/too hard. Presumably she can't feel what she's doing. She also has left vocal cord paralysis (called a true paralysis-as it is not the result of any intervention.) I don't believe it's any worse, but the appearance of it is moreso now that she is grown. I'm really surprised to hear of a true palsy changing, and particularly manifesting from one side and then the other. What might be the explanation for that? in Ma. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Hi Yuka, My understanding is that the facial nerve and the palsy are variable and can change over time. I had emailed Meg asking about this, because I had always read that the palsy should either stay stable or improve. She wrote back and said yes, that's what they are supposed to do, but since when has anything with CHARGE ever been the way it was supposed to be. This is our experience with it: Evan went from not appearing to have a palsy at all at birth, to at 2 weeks a unilateral palsy on the right side that affected his eye (blinking, closing all the way), his midface (no tone around the nostril), and his mouth (no smile or frown on that side). When he would get angry and cry, the left side of his face would make an expression and he would squint his eye--the right was expressionless with an open eye. We used to call that look " the eye " ...as in, " Oh, Evan's upset and giving us " the eye " again. " As he got older (around 4 months, I think), the palsy changed. He now has a bilateral incomplete palsy--he can blink and close both his eyes reasonably well (sometimes they remain a bit open if he's in a deep sleep). He smiles with the right side of his mouth, and now the left doesn't move (the opposite of when he was a young infant). He had a CT of the temporal bone done at 1 year of age. The facial nerve was only commented on on one side, and it was smaller than normal. I'm sure he has one on both sides, since he has some function on both sides of his face. They just weren't able to see it. Evan also had an MRI done at 4 months, and it was unremarkable. (mom to Evan, 23 months) Yuka Persico yuka@...> wrote: Dear list- does not seem to have any facial palsy, and when he was a neonate MRIs were not the norm, so he does not have the extensive kind of diagnostic testing infants do today. I would greatly appreciate information to help fill in my gaps of understanding from what I have heard the doctor say versus what I have experienced in a five week old darling baby boy. I heard the doctor say that on the first MRI the facial nerve was not present. The second MRI either confirmed or disaffirmed that finding, so they will default to the findings of the first MRI with regard to the facial nerve. The doctor went on to explain that the nerves all on one side of the face would not innervate - which is to mean the forehead, the eyebrow, the eyelid, the cheek and the jaw. The face would be asymmetrical. It really sounded as though there should be no movement at all. Yet to watch this precious baby, certainly there is some asymmetry of expression when yawning, and the darling smiles that one lives for are stronger on one side or the other, but the eye on the affected side does close more often than not, and there does not feel as though there is a complete absence of innervations to one side of the infant's face. Is this a case of the diagnostic and clinical do not paint the whole picture? I would love to be able to provide a greater breadth and nuance of information to the family on this. Thank you so much in advance - in love, yuka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 , 's facial palsy is on the left and when he was little would do the same thing.. we called him Popeye the Sailorman.. I used to threaten to dress him up in a sailor outfit put a corncob pipe in his mouth and piss him off and take his picture. The only thing that ahs improved with his palsy is his ability to close his eye. Casey ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 I never knew the operation for facial palsy wasnt so good. Ive wished it was easier to smile. I can smile but smiling makes my face hurt alot and its hard to smile for a camera (dispite what some ppl think i guess). I dont think I will look into the mild facial palsy stuff. I have mild bilateral facial palsy and thats fine. Chantelle > > Dear - > > Thank you so much for your reply. Though your reply doesn't indicate I > may have confused you, reading my post I found myself confusing. The baby > boy in question is not but a darling boy at > -- I have 4 eyes, 4 ears, a guide cat and a cat that speaks mouse! - me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Hi Yuka, I know which family you are talking about (I've been corresponding off-list with them), so I wasn't confused that it was ! , I have no idea why the palsy would change--I just know that we have pictures of him with his " Pop-eye " look and no movement of the mouth on the right, and the right side is the " smile " side now. Most doctors I talk to don't have an explanation for why it changed from strongly unilateral to bilateral and affecting different branches of the facial nerve. (mom to Evan, 23 months) Yuka Persico yuka@...> wrote: Dear - Thank you so much for your reply. Though your reply doesn't indicate I may have confused you, reading my post I found myself confusing. The baby boy in question is not but a darling boy at Children's Hospital here in Los Angeles. I happened to be visiting when the Neurologist, in all her diagnostician and clinician charm imparted the information, peppered with " we'll have to follow this up.... we're in no hurry to get him out of here....of course we don't know if he'll ever (fill in the blank).... " The MRI's show this baby has absent facial nerves on one side. The doctor did not refer to them as cranial nerves, but rather " facial nerves on one side are absent. " Right now both sides of his face are equally relaxed and appear mostly to be symmetrical. Asymmetry in expression is noticed in large expressions - such as crying or yawning. The most wonderful thing is your re-imparting of Meg's wisdom. The parents have been hearing plenty of " we don't know if he'll ever walk " and stuff like that. Why must these things be said so dour and stern? As though not knowing was as good as it never happening? Really. In the NICU the logic of a new sense of wholeness, the wisdom that physical capacity has little to do with actual value and meaning, and the tenderness of exploring a world in which things happen a little differently but happen wonderfully all the same would be kind....and more honest (barring critical life sustaining issues of course). My heart is with them- thank you so much- yuka Re: facial palsy - facial nerve Hi Yuka, My understanding is that the facial nerve and the palsy are variable and can change over time. I had emailed Meg asking about this, because I had always read that the palsy should either stay stable or improve. She wrote back and said yes, that's what they are supposed to do, but since when has anything with CHARGE ever been the way it was supposed to be. This is our experience with it: Evan went from not appearing to have a palsy at all at birth, to at 2 weeks a unilateral palsy on the right side that affected his eye (blinking, closing all the way), his midface (no tone around the nostril), and his mouth (no smile or frown on that side). When he would get angry and cry, the left side of his face would make an expression and he would squint his eye--the right was expressionless with an open eye. We used to call that look " the eye " ...as in, " Oh, Evan's upset and giving us " the eye " again. " As he got older (around 4 months, I think), the palsy changed. He now has a bilateral incomplete palsy--he can blink and close both his eyes reasonably well (sometimes they remain a bit open if he's in a deep sleep). He smiles with the right side of his mouth, and now the left doesn't move (the opposite of when he was a young infant). He had a CT of the temporal bone done at 1 year of age. The facial nerve was only commented on on one side, and it was smaller than normal. I'm sure he has one on both sides, since he has some function on both sides of his face. They just weren't able to see it. Evan also had an MRI done at 4 months, and it was unremarkable. (mom to Evan, 23 months) Yuka Persico yuka@...> wrote: Dear list- does not seem to have any facial palsy, and when he was a neonate MRIs were not the norm, so he does not have the extensive kind of diagnostic testing infants do today. I would greatly appreciate information to help fill in my gaps of understanding from what I have heard the doctor say versus what I have experienced in a five week old darling baby boy. I heard the doctor say that on the first MRI the facial nerve was not present. The second MRI either confirmed or disaffirmed that finding, so they will default to the findings of the first MRI with regard to the facial nerve. The doctor went on to explain that the nerves all on one side of the face would not innervate - which is to mean the forehead, the eyebrow, the eyelid, the cheek and the jaw. The face would be asymmetrical. It really sounded as though there should be no movement at all. Yet to watch this precious baby, certainly there is some asymmetry of expression when yawning, and the darling smiles that one lives for are stronger on one side or the other, but the eye on the affected side does close more often than not, and there does not feel as though there is a complete absence of innervations to one side of the infant's face. Is this a case of the diagnostic and clinical do not paint the whole picture? I would love to be able to provide a greater breadth and nuance of information to the family on this. Thank you so much in advance - in love, yuka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Dear Yuka, I thought I would jump in and add a little bit to 's reply from our experience, which was somewhat similar in that the facial paralysis changed over time more than once. When Kendra was born, there was no apparent facial assymetry or paralysis. At one month she experienced a catastrophic episode of not-breathing for several minutes due to a blocked trach tube. The neonatalogists noticed as she recovered from the experience that she had facial nerve paralysis. She required drops in her eyes to keep them lubricated at night as she could not close them fully. Sometime during her first year, the facial paralysis disappeared. She no longer required the night drops and there was no visual assymetry. Strangely, sometime around 14 or 15 months, it returned with vengeance. When she cried, there was an absolute difference between sides of her face. The doctor treated with prednisone briefly, but there was no relief. Interestingly, the last time I saw the assymetry was just prior to the repair of the double aoritc arch at 2 years of age. Amazingly, within days of the successful surgery, the assymetry and facial paralysis was gone. There has never been any concrete answer as to the reason for the surprising and helpful turn of events. I have hypothesized that perhaps the double aortic arch, while compressing the esophagus and the trachea, may have also affected the facial nerve and may have became more apparent as she grew. Otherwise I have wondered if the improved health she experienced as a result of the surgery contributed to the great lessening of the condition. Perhaps there was a viral or other illness component that aggraveated the appearance of the difficulty at 14 or 15 months. Ultimately, when Kendra became able to eat orally, she experienced another improvement to the facial nerves thought HANDLE Institute exercises. Following the facial exercises she became able to chew more effectively and safely. Kendra does not show remarkable facial assymetry or paralysis to this day at age 20. So, I send my best to you for working so beautifully and with such support with the family, and I send all best wishes and positive thoughts to them as well. Re: facial palsy - facial nerve Hi Yuka, My understanding is that the facial nerve and the palsy are variable and can change over time. I had emailed Meg asking about this, because I had always read that the palsy should either stay stable or improve. She wrote back and said yes, that's what they are supposed to do, but since when has anything with CHARGE ever been the way it was supposed to be. This is our experience with it: Evan went from not appearing to have a palsy at all at birth, to at 2 weeks a unilateral palsy on the right side that affected his eye (blinking, closing all the way), his midface (no tone around the nostril), and his mouth (no smile or frown on that side). When he would get angry and cry, the left side of his face would make an expression and he would squint his eye--the right was expressionless with an open eye. We used to call that look " the eye " ...as in, " Oh, Evan's upset and giving us " the eye " again. " As he got older (around 4 months, I think), the palsy changed. He now has a bilateral incomplete palsy--he can blink and close both his eyes reasonably well (sometimes they remain a bit open if he's in a deep sleep). He smiles with the right side of his mouth, and now the left doesn't move (the opposite of when he was a young infant). He had a CT of the temporal bone done at 1 year of age. The facial nerve was only commented on on one side, and it was smaller than normal. I'm sure he has one on both sides, since he has some function on both sides of his face. They just weren't able to see it. Evan also had an MRI done at 4 months, and it was unremarkable. (mom to Evan, 23 months) Yuka Persico yuka@...> wrote: Dear list- does not seem to have any facial palsy, and when he was a neonate MRIs were not the norm, so he does not have the extensive kind of diagnostic testing infants do today. I would greatly appreciate information to help fill in my gaps of understanding from what I have heard the doctor say versus what I have experienced in a five week old darling baby boy. I heard the doctor say that on the first MRI the facial nerve was not present. The second MRI either confirmed or disaffirmed that finding, so they will default to the findings of the first MRI with regard to the facial nerve. The doctor went on to explain that the nerves all on one side of the face would not innervate - which is to mean the forehead, the eyebrow, the eyelid, the cheek and the jaw. The face would be asymmetrical. It really sounded as though there should be no movement at all. Yet to watch this precious baby, certainly there is some asymmetry of expression when yawning, and the darling smiles that one lives for are stronger on one side or the other, but the eye on the affected side does close more often than not, and there does not feel as though there is a complete absence of innervations to one side of the infant's face. Is this a case of the diagnostic and clinical do not paint the whole picture? I would love to be able to provide a greater breadth and nuance of information to the family on this. Thank you so much in advance - in love, yuka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.